medigraphic.com
Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

2012, Number 43

<< Back Next >>

Oral 2012; 13 (43)

Shutter immediate surgical patient with undifferentiated carcinoma sinus tract

Fernández GM, Estrada EBE

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 931-934
PDF size: 114.39 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the maxillofacial prosthetics is a dental specialty that rehabilitates the function and aesthetics of those patients who have been treated by oncoquirurgics procedures. Objective: optimize the quality of life of the patient. Report of the case: male patient, 52 years old, arrive to the Stomatologic Sciences Mastery in Oral Rehabilitation Clinic at the BUAP, with the reason of making an immediate surgical obturator. In an intra-oral review observes a tumoral aspect injury in the area corresponding to the upper right quadrant. Realization of theobturator: study models were taken and a consultation was held with the surgical oncologist to determine the extent of surgical resection. In the surgery, once the injury was removed, adjustments were made to the obturator to have a good adaptation in the remaining structures and with the use of tissue conditioner achieved a better adjustment of the obturator. Three weeks later the patient was cited to make the change of the tissue conditioner, and instruct him in the removal, placement and cleaning care of the obturator. Conclusions: dental intervention is part of a multidisciplinary team to ensure the physical and emotional well-being of patients with oncological diseases.


REFERENCES

  1. 1.-Omondi y cols. Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis Rehabilitation Following Maxillectomy for Ameloblastoma: Case Series of Five Patients. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:464468.

  2. 2.-Troconis, Z. y cols. Importancia de la prótesis obturadora maxilar en la rehabilitación del paciente oncológico. Rev Venez Oncol 2003;15(2):92-99.

  3. 3.-Lethaus y cols. Surgical and prosthetic reconsiderations in patients with maxillectomy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2010 37; 138142.

  4. 4.-Robles, Vázquez. Manejo protésico en paciente con carcinoma adenoide quístico. Oral Año 9. Núm. 29. Verano 2008. 468-471.

  5. 5.-Sapp, Eversole, Wysocki. Patología Oral y Maxilofacial Contemporánea. Segunda edición, 2004. Editorial Elsevier. p. 184, 185.

  6. 6.- Edwards, Hess, Saini. Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Maxillary Sinus. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(2):1637.

  7. 7.-Neville, Damm, Allen, Bouquot. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Second edition, 2002. United States of America. Saunders Company. P. 371, 372.

  8. 8.-Tanzler y cols. Management of Sinonasal Undiferentiated Carcinoma. Head Neck 30: 595599, 2008.

  9. 9.-Fandiño, T.L.A. y cols. Elaboración de obturador quirúrgico en un paciente con hemimaxilectomía por carcinoma epidermoide. Revista ADM 2001; LVIII(6):220- 228.

  10. 10.-Keyf, F. Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2001 28; 821-829.

  11. 11.-B. Rilo y cols. A hollow-bulb interim obturator for maxillary resection. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2005 32; 234236.

  12. 12.-Oh, Roumanas. Optimization of Maxillary Obturator Thickness Using a Double-Processing Technique. Journal of Prosthodontics 17 (2008) 6063.

  13. 13.-Kanazawa y cols. Sectional prosthesis with hollow obturator portion made of thin silicone layer over resin frame. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2000 27; 760- 764. 14.-Oki y cols. The vibratory characteristics of obturators with different bulb height and form designs. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2006 33; 4351.

  14. 15.-Roesch y cols. Importancia Clínica de un Obturador Quirúrgico, Reporte de un caso. Oral Año 8. Núm. 24. Primavera 2007. 368-371.

  15. 16.-Matsuyama y cols. Clinical Assessment of Chewing Function of Obturator Prosthesis Wearers by Objective Measurement of Masticatory Performance and Maximum Occlusal Force. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:253257.

  16. 17.-Ono y cols. Masticatory Performance in Postmaxillectomy Patients with Edentulous Maxillae Fitted with Obturator Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:145150.

  17. 18.-Matsuyama y cols. Objective Clinical Assessment of Change in Swallowing Ability of Maxillectomy Patients when Wearing Obturator Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:475479.

  18. 19.-Rieger y cols. Speech Outcomes in Patients Rehabilitated with Maxillary Obturator Prostheses After Maxillectomy: A Prospective Study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:139144.

  19. 20.-Matsuyama y cols. Subjective Assessment of Chewing Function of Obturator Prosthesis Wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:4650.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com