Zurbano CA

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 110-116
PDF size: 73.65 Kb.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive observational research of transversal type was made in prosthesis service of “Arnaldo Milián Castro” University Hospital, between September, 2008 and April, 2010 in order to evaluate possible influence of biochemical aspects in the state of implant-supported rehabilitations of immediate charge. The universe was constituted by those patients with rehabilitations over implants of immediate charge of Trinon Q - Implants' System. The sample of 100 rehabilitations was randomly taken: 16 single-implant rehabilitations and 84 bridges. Significant relations between biochemical factors and state of implant-supported rehabilitations of immediate charge were identified; they were mainly favourable in most of the cases, as well as, between type and state of rehabilitations. The most influential factors were direction of incidental forces and relation between extension of rehabilitation and implant numbers.

REFERENCES

1. Vanegas A. JC, Landinez P. NS, Garzón-Alvarado DA. Generalidades de la interfase huesoimplante dental. Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd [internet]. 2009 jul.-sep. [citado 2 mayo 2013 ];28(3):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 03002009000300011&lng=es

2. Velasco Ortega E, Pato Mourelo J, García Méndez A, Segura Egea JJ, Jiménez Guerra A. Implantología oral guiada asistida por ordenador en el tratamiento del paciente edéntulo mandibular. Av Periodoncia [internet]. 2011 abr. [citado 2 mayo 2013];23(1):[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1699- 65852011000100002&lng=es

3. Romanos GE. Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants. Critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience. Implant Dent. 2009;18:203-9.

4. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:234-42.

5. RED Latinoamericana de Salud Bucal. Prótesis implantosoportadas. La Habana: Conferencia Internacional de Rehabilitación sobre Implantes y Estética Dental; 24-29 mayo 2004.

6. Morales Rosell L, García Alpízar B, Pieri Silva K, Gonzalez Arocha BA, Benet Rodríguez M. Factores biomecánicos en la rehabilitación por prótesis parcial fija sobre implantes Microdent. Medisur [internet]. 2011 [citado 2 mayo 2013];9(2):[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/1565

7. Becerra G, Ramón ÓM. Consideraciones en el manejo de los implantes en la zona estética. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2009;20(2):191-204.

8. Molina Blanco JD, Aguirre Zorzano LA, Ortiz de Guinea JR. Periimplantitis. Etiología, clínica y tratamiento. Revisión de la Literatura. Periodoncia. 2002;10(3):175.

9. Rosenstiel SF. Prótesis fijas implantosoportadas. En: Prótesis fija contemporánea. 4ta. ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2008. p. 151-2.

10. Misch CE. Fundamentos de los implantes dentales. En: Implantología contemporánea. 3ra. ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2009. p. 112-20.

11. Amaro-Padilla RE, Cahuana-Vásquez VZ, Balarezo-Razzeto JA. Implantes inmediatos con prótesis fija implantosoportada en el maxilar superior. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2011;21(4):205-9.

12. Degidi M, Novaes AB, Nardi D, Piattelli A. Outcome analysis of immediately placed, immediately restored implants in the esthetic area: the clinical relevance of different inter implant distances. J Periodontol. 2008;79(6):1056-61.

13. Scher EL. A gross error occurred when treatment planning a guided surgery case. Implant Dentistry. 2009;18:297-302.