medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3038 (Print)

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr 2013; 29 (2)

Determination of social and demographic factors related to the success or failure of knee prosthesis surgery

Arévalo VF, Fernández OMÁ, Ponce RER, Cruz SDX

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page:
PDF size: 95.30 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the social and demographic factors associated with the success or failure (complications), of knee prosthesis surgery, from January 2009 to December 2010, at the Regional Hospital Adolfo López Mateos (ISSSTE), in Mexico.
Design: Descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study. Population: post-surgery knee prosthesis patients.
Method: 240 patients operated of knee prosthesis surgery records were studied; of which, only 155 met the inclusion criteria. The information was entered into the Excel and SPSS 20 program, carrying out analysis of frequencies, variability, correlation and multivariate technique of discriminant analysis.
Results: From a population of 155 patients, 30 (19.3 %) presented complications. From the nine variables only two showed a statistical significance: at the age of 48 (31%), with p‹ -0.001 and Gamma - 0.702, indicated a good correlation, the older the lesser complications shown. The occupation with 53 assets (34.2 %), with p‹ 0.001 and Eta 0. 301, indicated a low correlation, to greater activity the more complications shown. There was no conclusive result in the MBI.
Conclusions: Young and active patients have major complications. Obesity has a relative influence.


REFERENCES

  1. Hanssen AD. Cirugía de la rodilla: sustitución total. Madrid: Editorial Elsevier, 2010:128-327.

  2. Rivera J, Cuevas L, Shamah T, Villalpando S, Ávila MA. Jiménez A. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2006. México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. México: Editorial Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2006:83-121.

  3. Soberón G. La reforma de la salud en México. Rev. Gaceta Medica de México. 2001;137(5):431.

  4. Kenneth D. Brandt. Rehumatic: Disease M.D. Clinics. México: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2002:563-575.

  5. Castiella-Muruzábal Artroplastia de rodilla. Rev. Elservier. 2007;41(6):308.

  6. Lavernia, C. Artroplastia total de rodilla. Rev. Orthopaedic Institute at Mercy Hospital Miami, Fl., EU. 2008;13:11.

  7. Sánchez M. Artroplastia total de rodilla. Clásica o mínimamente invasiva. Rev. Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular. 2007;42:132.

  8. Ortega A. Barco L, Rodríguez ME. Artroplastia total de rodilla. Rev. Elsevier. 2002;5(476):486.

  9. Nava M. Prótesis de cadera y rodilla en el ISSSTE. Gac. Med. Méx. de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas, 2010;10:2-1.

  10. Silvestre JA, Castro G, Navarro BV, Torró BD, López-Quiles G. Prótesis de rodilla LCS con plataforma rotatoria. Resultados a medio-largo plazo. Rev. Elsevier de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. 2008;02(001):33.

  11. Rodríguez Merchán EC. Prótesis de rodilla primaria: Estado actual. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana. 2008:10-47.

  12. De la Fuente Zuno, J. Innovación médica en traumatología y ortopedia, mejora calidad de vida a enfermos crónicos degenerativos en el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Gac. Méd. Méx. 2009;231:1-6.

  13. Jeán F, Sanz-Gallardo MI, Arrazola MP, García de Codes S. De Juanes A. Resines C. Estudio multicéntrico sobre la incidencia de infección en prótesis de rodilla. Rev. Elsevier de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. 2011;08(001):17.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com