medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)

2013, Number 05

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2013; 17 (05)

Antepartum cervix evaluation: practical significance in obstetrics

Nápoles MD

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 838-848
PDF size: 84.23 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Antepartum evaluation of the cervix is a necessary procedure in obstetric practice to predict the response to pre-induction, induction, and onset of labor according to cervix ripening. The review aims to provide one more tool to evaluate the condition of the cervix before the labor by means of cross evaluation of its speculum examination, as an alternative that can be used in obstetrics. The method, besides being useful and noninvasive, reduces interobserver variability.


REFERENCES

  1. Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Say D. Factors predicting successful labour induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88(6): 990-2.

  2. Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964; 24: 266-8.

  3. Cardoso LD, Gibb DM, Studd JW, Vasant RV, Cooper DJ. Predictive value of cervimetriclabour patterns in primigravidae. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982; 89(1): 33-8.

  4. Nápoles Méndez D, Gómez Neyra Y, Caveda Gil A. Experiencia del uso del misoprostol en la preinducción e inducción del parto. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2007[citado 12 Feb 2008]; 33 (3).

  5. Peisner DB, Rosen MG. Latent phase of labor in normal patients: a reassessment. Obstet Gynaecol. 1985; 66(5): 644-8.

  6. Nápoles Méndez D, Cutié León ER. Nuevo protocolo diagnóstico y terapéutico en la distocia de fase latente del trabajo de parto [tesis doctoral]. 2008. Hospital Provincial Ginecoobstétrico “Mariana Grajales Coello”, Santiago de Cuba [citado 12 Mar 2011].

  7. Akerud A, Dubiecke A, Sennstrom M, EkmonOrderberg G, Malmström A. Differences in heparan sulfate production in cervical fibroblast cultures from women undergoin term and preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87(11): 1220-8.

  8. Vaisanen Tommiska M, Nuutila M, Aittomaki K, Hiilesmaa V, Ylikorkala O. Nitric oxide metabolites in cervical fluid during pregnancy: further evidence for the role of cervical nitric oxide in cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188(3): 779-85.

  9. Cheng SY. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 45(3): 225-9.

  10. Chiosi G, Verocchi G, Venturini P. Changes in cervical nitric oxide concentration correlate with Bishop score and cervical length modifications in prostaglandin E2- mediated induction of labor. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006; 13(3): 203-8.

  11. Carrera Macía JM. Distocia por fase latente prolongada. En: Protocolos de obstetricia y medicina perinatal del Instituto Dexeus. 2 ed. Barcelona: Salvat; 1988. p. 288.

  12. Nápoles Méndez D. La cervicometría en la valoración del parto pretérmino. MEDISAN. 2012 [citado 15 Feb 2012]; 16(1).

  13. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Progreso insatisfactorio del trabajo de parto. En: Manejo de las complicaciones del embarazo y el parto. Guía para obstetrices y médicos. Ginebra: OMS; 2002. p. 63-74.

  14. Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR, Fox HE. Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 1081-7.

  15. Pajntar M, Leskosek B, Rudel D, Verdenik I. Contribution of cervical smooth muscle activity to the duration of latent phases of labour. BJOG. 2001; 108(5): 533-8.

  16. Dencker A, Berg M, Bergquist L, Lilja H. Identification of latent phase factors associated with active labor duration in low-risk nulliparous women with spontaneous contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89(8): 1034-9.

  17. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. Washington, D.C.: ACOG; 2009. p. 107.

  18. López Criado MS, Santalla A, Aguilar T, Molina F, Manzanares S. Casos clínicos: medición cervical. Técnica y errores. En: Actualización en obstetricia y ginecología. Granada: Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología HUVN; 2009.

  19. Furink K. Cervicometry: all women need to know- midwifery today. Int Midwife. 2008; 85: 28-30.

  20. Saito M. Sonographic assessment of the cervix before, during and after a uterine contraction is effective in predicting the course of labour. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22(6): 604.

  21. Ware V, Raynor BD. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1030-2.

  22. Olah KS, Gee H, Brown JS. Cervical contractions: the response of the cervix to oxytocic stimulation in the latent phase of labor. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100(7): 635-40.

  23. Rolland Souza A, Ribeiro Costa AA, Coutinho I, Noronha N, Ramos Amorin MM. Induction of labor: concepts and particularities. Femina. 2010; 38: 4.

  24. Shields SG, Ratcliffe SD, Fontaine P, Leeman L. Review dystocia in nulliparous women. Am Fam Physician. 2007; 75(11): 1671-8.

  25. Neal JL, Lowe NK, Patrick TE, Cabbage LA, Corwin EJ. What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010; 39(4): 361-9.

  26. Durn JH, Marshall KM, Farrar D, O' Donovan P, Scally AJ, Woodward DF, et al. Lipidomic analysis reveals prostanoid profiles in human term pregnant myometrium. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2010; 82(1): 21-6.

  27. Stock S, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman J. Inducción electiva del parto vs. manejo expectante. BMJ. 2012; 344: 2838.

  28. Meijer-Hoogeveen M, RoosC, Arabin B, StoutenbeekP, Visser G. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33(2): 213-20.

  29. Eggebo T, Okland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen K. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88(3): 325-31.

  30. Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89(5): 651-7.

  31. Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 280(3): 357-62.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com