medigraphic.com
Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.

2007, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Neuroci 2007; 8 (6)

Study of validation of LURIA-DNA Battery comparing to WECHSLER (WAIS-III) Intelligence Scales in universitary students

Bausela HE

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 531-538
PDF size: 59.80 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In this research we try to study the assess the validity of Battery Luria-DNA comparing to Wechsler Intelligence Scales in a sample of 150 universitary undergraduate students of psichopedagogy. In this research, we applied both the Battery Luria-DNA and Wechsler Intelligence Third Version for adults in all the students included in order to sasses their neuropsychological performance. According to the results, we conclude that it is possible to apply both instruments for the neuropsychological assessment of adults and we consider that both instruments complement each other.


REFERENCES

  1. Hartlage LC, Golden CJ. Neuropsychological assessment techniques. In: Gutkin TB, Reynolds CR. The handbook of school psychology. 2nd Ed. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons; 1990, p. 431-57.

  2. Manaut E, Vaquero E, Quintero E, Pérez J, Gómez CM. Relación entre el déficit neurológico y el cociente de inteligencia en niños y adolescentes. Rev Neurol 2004; 38(1): 20-7.

  3. Wechsler D. Measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. 4a Ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1958.

  4. Baeder DH. An examination of the neuropsychological utility of the WAIS-III. Diss Abstr Int: Sci Eng 2001; 61: 4469.

  5. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson: Neuropsychology Press; 1993.

  6. Martínez JA, Guardia J, Peña J. Validación de las subpruebas del test Barcelona relacionadas con subtest de la escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para adultos. Neuropsychol Lat 1996; 2(1): 10-4.

  7. Sweet JJ, Carr MA, Rosini E, Kapsar C. Relationship between the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery-Children’s Revision and the WISC-R. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 1986; 8: 177-80.

  8. Moses JA, Pritchard DA, Adams RL. Neuropsychological information in the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1997; 12(2): 97-109.

  9. Castaño J. Trastornos de aprendizaje: Los caminos del error diagnóstico. Arch Argent Pediatr 2003; 101(3): 211-9.

  10. Devaraju S, Espe P, Mahrou ML, Golden CJ. Correlation of the LNNBS – III with the WAIS – III in a mixed psychiatric and brain–injured population. Int J Neurosci 2001; 111(3-4): 235-40.

  11. Prifitera A, Ryan JJ. Validity of the Luria – Nebraska Neurosychological Battery Intellectual Processes scales as a measure of adult intelligence. J Couns Clin Psychol 1981; 44: 527-33.

  12. Katz L, Goldstein G, Rudisin S, Bailey D. A neuropsychological approach to the Bannatyne recategorization of the Wechsler intelligence scales in adults with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1993; 26(1): 65-72.

  13. Golden CJ, Gustavson JL, Ariel R. Correlations between the Luria – Nebraska and the Halstead Reitan Neuropsychological Batteries: Effects of partialing out education and postmorbid intelligence. J Couns Clin Psychol 1982; 50(5): 770-1.

  14. Miller LS, Faustman WO, Moses JA, Csernansky JG. Evaluating cognitive impairment in depression with the Luria – Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Severity correlates and comparisons with nonpsychiatric controls. Psychiatr Res 1991; 37(3): 219-27.

  15. Goldstein G, Katz L, Slomka GT, Kelly MA. Relationship among academic, neuropsychological, and intelligence status in subtypes of adults with learning disability. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1993; 8(1): 41-53.

  16. León M, Salazar S, Bringas M, Torres O, Maragato C, Álvarez L, Álvarez E. Particularidades de la evaluación neuropsicológica y de diagnóstico de las demencias. Rev Mex Neuroc 2002; 3(1): 53-5.

  17. Rieck M. Evaluation of children with learning disabilities on Luria’s Neuropsychological Test Battery. Sch Psychol Int 1988; 9(4): 285-9.

  18. Manga D, Melcón MA. Alternativas a las escalas de Wechsler en la evaluación neuropsicológica de los procesos cognitivos. Polibea 2002; 63: 28-33.

  19. Berk RA. Verbal-performance IQ discrepancy score: A comment on reliability, abnormality, and validity. J Clin Psychol 1982; 38: 638-41.

  20. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Fundamentos de neuropsicología humana. Barcelona: Labor; 1986.

  21. Matarazzo JD. WAIS. Medida y valoración de la inteligencia del adulto. Barcelona: Salvat; 1976.

  22. Kaufman AS. Intelligence testing with the WISC-R. Nueva York: Wiley; 1979. (Versión castellana: Psicometría razonada con el WISC-R. México: El Manual Moderno; 1982).

  23. Wechsler D. Escala de Inteligencia Wechsler para Adultos (WAIS-III). 3a Ed. Madrid: TEA; 1999.

  24. Sullivan K, Bowden SC. Which tests do neuropsychologists use? J Clin Psychol 1997; 53: 657-61.

  25. Manga D, Ramos F. Luria-DNA (Batería Luria de diagnóstico neuropsicológico de adultos). Madrid: TEA; 2000.

  26. Bausela E. Estudio de validación de la batería neuropsicológica de adultos Luria-DNA frente a las escalas de Wechsler (WAIS-III) en estudiantes universitarios. Tesis doctoral inédita. Universidad de León, León; 2005.

  27. Taub GE, McGrew K, Witta EL. A confirmatory analysis of the factor structure and cross – age invariance of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition. Psychol Assess 2004; 16(1): 85-9.

  28. Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. Am Psychol 1980; 35: 1012-2.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com