medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Angiol 2011; 39 (3)

Estudio aleatorizado controlado de costo-efectividad de resonancia magnética en pacientes diabéticos con mal perforante plantar

Rojas GPA, Gutiérrez LMÁ, Serrano LJA, Flores EM, León JI, López MMC, Rodríguez AME

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 107-111
PDF size: 567.25 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine whether the addition of magnetic resonance imaging to current patient evaluation by radiography would aid the tissue extension infection, presence of osteomyelitis and thus reduce the surgical treatment extension and reduce the reoperation rate. To assess whether the addition of MRI would be cost-effective.
Material and methods: A randomized controlled, open, parallel group trial with equal randomization.
Participants. Male and female patients with diabetic foot, were scheduled for surgical treatment based on what we found in radiography in one group and magnetic resonance imaging in the other group.
Results: From a total of 33 patients, 13 were randomized to MRI and 20 to no MRI. No difference in clinical aspects were found between the groups, and we found statistical significance in the localization of the surgical treatment and the reoperation rate.


REFERENCES

  1. Schwegler B, Stumpe KDM, Weishaupt D, Strobel K, Spinas GA, von Schulthess GK, et al. Unsuspected osteomyelitis is frequent in persistent diabetic foot ulcer and better diagnosed by MRI than by 18F FDG PET or 99mTc MOAB. J Intern Med 2008; 263(1): 99 106.

  2. Jain A, Rubino V, Kitchener M, Sebben R, Fitridge R, Liau N. A comparison of radionuclide and MRI scans in the evaluation of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. In tern Med J 2008; 38(Suppl. 3): A44.

  3. Khaodhiar L, Stefansky S, et al. Use of magnetic reso nance spectroscopy to identify neuroischemic changes at the diabetic foot. Diabetes 2003; 52(Suppl. 1): A24.

  4. López Antuano S, López Antuano FJ. Diabetes mellitus y lesiones del pie. Sal Púb Méx 1998; 40(3): 281 92.

  5. Sicco AB, Yang QX, Wang JH. Intrinsic muscle atrophy and toe deformity in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Diab Care 2002; 25(8).

  6. Mendoza RMA, Ramírez AMC. Abordaje multidisciplinario del pie diabético. Rev Endocrinol Nut 2005; 13(4): 165 79.

  7. Martínez Gómez DA. Tratamiento de la infección en el pie diabético. Cir Esp 2004; 76(1): 9 15.

  8. Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Olivier C, et al. Multicentre ran domized controlled trial examining the cost effectiveness of contrast enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14:1, 1 198.

  9. Enderle M, Coerper S, Schweizer H, Kopp A, et al. Correlation of imaging techniques to histopathology in pa tients with diabetic foot syndrome and clinical suspicion of chronic osteomyelitis. Diab Care 1999; 22: 294 9.

  10. Boyko E, Ahroni J, Stensel V, Forsberg J, et al. A pros pective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. Diab Care 1999; 22: 1036 42.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com