Pérez ESU, García ÁJ, Torres LE

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 164-173
PDF size: 150.84 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic surgery has evolved in recent years from an experimental procedure to be the gold standard in some of the most common surgical procedures performed today. Given the characteristics of endoscopic surgery that allows to all the staff view the surgical procedure, it is possible to standardize the surgical steps of the procedure within certain limits of the condition to be treated. At present, there is not universally recommended model for the evaluation of endoscopic surgery. The ideal evaluation system should pursue the following principles: easy to use, easy to interpret, to be exact, to be valid, and to be reliable. The aim of this review is to show the different evaluation systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and its basic features for standardization of laparoscopic surgery. The focus is centered to learn an auto-evaluation laparoscopic procedures form of proper performance, and maintain the quality and safety offered to patients who undergo a surgical procedure like this.

REFERENCES

1. Bernard HR, Hartmann TW. Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 533-5.

2. Mishra A, et al. The influence of non tecnical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 68-73.

3. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, et al. Randomized study of two dimensional versus three dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 1998; 351: 248-51.

4. Ellison CE, et al. Lessons learned from the evolution of the laparoscopic revolution. Surg Clin North Am, 2008; 88: 927-41.

5. Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999; 44: 187-92.

6. Litwin DME, Cahan MA. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88: 1295-313.

7. Justo JJ. Sistemas de evaluación de destreza en cirugía endoscópica. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica 2007; 8(2): 90-6.

8. Tang B, Hanna B, et al. Identification and categorization of technical Errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 1215-20.

9. Cuschieri A. Reducing errors in the operating room. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1022-7.

10. Eubanks TR, Clements RH, et al. An objective Scoring System for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 566-74.

11. Swanstrom LL, Fried GM, et al. Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202(1): 62-9.

12. Troild H. Disasters of endoscopic surgery and how to avoid them: Error Analysis. Wor J Surg 1999; 23(8): 846-55.

13. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, et al. Analysis error in laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 592-95.

14. Sarker SK, Hutchinson R, et al. Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 636-40.

15. Sarker SK, Chan A, et al. Technical skill errors in laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by expert surgeons. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 832-5.

16. Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204(2): 308-13.

17. Korndroffer JR, Dunne JB, et al. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 23-9.

18. Aggrawal R, Grantcharov TP, et al. An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 310-14.

19. Aggrawal R, Grantcharov TP, et al. A competency-basded virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 191: 28-133.

20. Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 193: 797-804.

21. Seymour N, Gallagher AG, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg 2002; 236(4): 458-64.

22. Hwang H, Lim J, et al. Correlating motor performance with surgical error in laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 651-5.