de la Torre GDM, Ortiz RF, González HFJ, Ramírez CG, Aguilar AM

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 170-175
PDF size: 374.01 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The uncertainty of the lumbosacral spine continues being an explosive for the pain and inability in any individual that suffers it, be which is the cause in these people the quality and/or the lifestyle it is altered, the advances in the technology have given the opportunity to create multiple systems that favor the spine surgeons substantially to obtain good surgical results that benefit the sick persons. Objective. To value the utility of a new transpedicular system type Venus of Human Tech in the sick persons with uncertainty lumbosacral spine in the Hospital Juarez de Mexico. Material and methods. It is valued the use of a transpedicular system like first project in 10 patients with uncertainty lumbosacral spine during a period of 3 months, 3 patients with spondilolysthesis, 2 patients with disk hernia, 4 patients for uncertainty vertebral post surgical and 1 patient with vertebral traumatic fracture with an age range among the 35 and 55 years. Results. It is a prospective study in first stage in which is evaluated the post surgical result of the instrumentation lumbosacral with a system of transpedicular instrumentation, any patient I present immediate complication with respect to the system, single 1 patient presents residual hematoma. Conclusion. The use of system transpedicular instrumentation type Venus of Human Tech is appropriate to treat the lumbosacral vertebral uncertainty.

REFERENCES

1. Kim DH, Vaccaro AR, Richard G. Spinal instrumentation, surgical techniques. Fessler Editorial Thime.

2. Celebi OL, Muratli HH, Yagmurlu MF, Bicimoglu A. The effectiveness of short-segment posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Act Orthop Traumatol Tur 2007; 41(3): 183-9.

3. Esenkaya I, Olcay E, Gulmez T, Vehid H. Biomecanical evaluation of the pull-out strengths of pedicular screws whit expandable distal tips. Act Orthop Traumatol Turc 2000; 34: 396-402.

4. Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD, Zeidman SM, Chang AS, Klemme WR. Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture Kyphosis: Evaluation of intraobserver, intereobserver, and technique variability. Spine 2001; 26: 61-5.

5. Oner FC, Van Gils AP, Faber JA, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ. Some complication of common treatment Schemes of thoracolumbar spine fractures can be predicted whit magnetic resonance imagining; prospective study of 53 patients whit 71 fractures. Spine 2002; 27: 629-36.

6. Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, Gaines RW. Successful Short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 4 years series. Spine 2000; 25: 1157-70.

7. Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T, Liljenqvist U. Segmental Pedicle Screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 191-7.

8. Liljenqvist U. Lepsien U, Hackenberg L, Halm H. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fission of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 332-43.

9. Liljenqvist U, Lepsien U, Hackenberg L, Halm H. Pullout Strength of pedicle Screw VS Pedicle and laminar Hooks in the Thoracic spine. Act Orthop Belg 2001; 67: 157-63.

10. Halm, Steinbeck, Liljenqvist, Castro. Operative treatment of thoracolumbar scoliosis by means of transpedicular screw fixation according to the VDS-rules: prospective study whit regard to the MPDS and Accuracy of Screw Placement. Orthopaed Practice 12/95-31 Volume, pages 866-872.