Hernández-Martínez JA, Martínez-Nava S

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 174-178
PDF size: 72.66 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The concept of limits of viability is not clearly defined and varies according to the institution, state and country of origin. Revive and bring to an intensive treatment to premature immature has led to an increase in the mortality rate and aftermath that ranging from mild to severe. Currently apply the ethical principles for autonomy, charity, not harmfulness and justice, with the aim of taking the best decisions around the newborn. It is that have been created clinical guidelines proposed in a basis for the gestational age, scientific evidence and opinion of the parents or guardians. The premature to the limit of the feasibility pose major challenges to the medicine, society and ethics, which should take decisions shared between the health team and with the parents or institutions representing the best interests of the newborn.

REFERENCES

1. Guzmán-Bárcenas J. Límites de viabilidad. Ginecol Obtet Mex 2007; 75: S10-S13.

2. Hernández-Martínez J. Sobrevida y desarrollo psicomotor en RN < 30 semanas de gestación. Rev Med Sur 2006; 13: 87.

3. Hernández J. La supervivencia de recién nacidos prematuros extremos. Artículo de revisión. Rev Med Sur 2001; 4: 107-11.

4. Salas R, Jodorkovsky M, Martínez J. Límites de viabilidad. Rev Med Clin CONDES 2008; 19(3): 278-83.

5. Campbell D, Fleischman M. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions and decision Makers. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18(3): 117-28.

6. McCulloung L. Neonatal ethics at the limits of viability. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1019-21.

7. Blackmon L. Biologic limits of viability: implications for clinical decision-making. Neo Reviews 2003; 4:140-7.

8. Meadow W, Lantos J. Ethics at the limit of viability: a Premie’s Progress. Neo Reviews 2003; 4: 157-62.

9. Seri I, Evans J. Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol 2008; 28: S4-S8.

10. Rodríguez G. Dilemas Bioéticos en viabilidad neonatal. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 2005; 31(4): 1-9.

11. Allen M, Donohue P. The limit of viability: Neonatal Outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks gestation. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1597-601.

12. Herber-Jonat S, Schuize A. Survival and major neonatal complications in infants born between 22 0/7 and 24 6/7 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 195: 16-22.

13. Lira J, Arteaga C. En los límites de viabilidad: el dilema del obstetra. INPER 2000; 68: 236-40.

14. Keogh J, Sinn J. Delivery in the Grey zone. Australian New Zealand J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 47: 273-8.

15. Morgan M, Golddenberg R. Obstetrician gynecologist practice regarding preterm birth at the limit of viability. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21(2): 115-21.

16. Genzel-Boroviczeny O. Mortality and major morbidity in premature infants less than 31 weeks gestacional age in the decade after introduction of surfactant. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2006; 85: 65-73.

17. Haumont D. Management of the neonate at the limits of viability. Inter J Obtet Gynecol 2005; 112: 64-6.

18. Seubert D, Huang W. Medical Legal Issues in the prevention of prematurity. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 309-18.

19. Chervenak F. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: Gynecological, Obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 27: 3-7.

20. Canadian Pediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee, and Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, Maternal- Fetal Medicine Committee. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. CMAJ 1994; 151: 547-53.

21. Sebastiani M, Ceriani J. Aspectos bioéticos en el cuidado de los recién nacidos extremadamente prematuros. Arch Argent Pediatr 2008; 106(3): 242-8.

22. Hübner M, Ramírez R. Sobrevida, viabilidad y pronóstico del prematuro. Rev Med Chile 2002; 130: 931-8.