2013, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2013; 27 (1)
Functional results of surgery for cervical stenosis
Alpízar-Aguirre A, Solano-Vargas JD, Zárate-Kalfopulus B, Rosales-Olivares LM, Sánchez-Bringas G, Reyes-Sánchez AA
Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 4-8
PDF size: 55.01 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Cervical stenosis refers to the narrowing of the spinal canal or the intervertebral foramina at different anatomic levels, secondary to pathologic processes of the vertebral elements. Surgical management is used when conservative management fails. The anterior and posterior approaches are the most frequently used ones, and the surgical options resulting from these approaches are: anterior cervical diskectomy plus fusion, anterior corporectomy plus fusion, laminoplasty, laminectomy and arthroplasty.
Material and method: This is an ambispective study conducted in 195 patients with a diagnosis of cervical stenosis who required surgical treatment at our hospital from January 1995 to January 2007. The neck disability index questionnaire was applied, as well as the Nurick scale. Descriptive statistics was used with frequency and percentage measures.
Results: The review of the National Rehabilitation Institute electronic records from January 1st 1995 to December 31st 2007 showed that 195 patients underwent surgery for cervical stenosis. Females were predominant. The most affected age group was 46-55 years. The most frequently affected level was C5-C6. A significant improvement was seen in the neck disability index due to pain and the Nurick scale.
Conclusion: According to world literature, mean age of patients with cervical stenosis is 57.2 years, and the most compromised levels were C4-C5 and C5-C6. Improvement was evident according to the neck disability index and the Nurick scale.
REFERENCES
Matta-Ibarra J, Jaimes-Sepúlveda L: Estenosis cervical: Descompresión, fijación y artrodesis vía anterior. Rev Colom Ortop Traum 2007; 21(4): 225-31.
Raj R: Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Ame 2002; 84: 1872-81.
Herrera-Espinosa F, Abril-Aguilar AC, Medina-González F, Duplat-Ayala L: Artrodesis cervical anterior con cajas de fusión intercorporal de carbono tipo bengal, placas slim loc y fosfato tricálcico. Rev Col Ortop Traum 2008; 22(1): 41-9.
Salemi G, Savettieri G, Meneghini F, Di Benedetto ME, Ragonese P, Morgante L, et al: Prevalence of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a door-to-door survey in a Sicilian municipality. Acta Neurol Scand 1996; 93: 184-8.
Croft PR, Lewis M, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ, Silman AJ: Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population. Pain 2001; 93: 317-25.
Inami S, Shiga T, Tsujino A, Yabuki T, Okado N, Ochiai N: Immunohistochemical demonstration of nerve fibers in the synovial fold of the human cervical facet joint. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 593-6.
Raj R: Radiculopathy and cervical myelopathy, pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84(10): 1872-81.
Raj R, Bradford C, Todd A, Christopher B, Satyajit M, Kornelis P: Degenerative cervical spondylosis: clinical syndromes, pathogenesis and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1360-78.
Chabot MC, Montgomery DM: The pathophysiology of axial and radicular neck pain. Semin Spine Surg 1995; 7: 2-8.
Cooper RG, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA, Jenkins JP, West CG, Illingworth KJ, et al: herniated intervertebral disc-associated periradicular fibrosis and vascular abnormalities occur without inflammatory cell infiltration. Spine 1995; 20: 591-8.
Rydevik BL, Myers RR, Powell HC: Pressure increase in the dorsal root ganglion following mechanical compression. Closed compartment syndrome in nerve roots. Spine 1989; 14: 574-6.
Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Shichikawa K, Shimomura Y: Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 67: 609-11.
Bohlman HH: Cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Instructional Course Lecture. Am Acad Orthop Surgeons 1995; 44: 81-97.
Houser OW, Onofrio BM, Miller GM, Folger WN, Smith PL: Cervical spondylotic stenosis and myelopathy: Evaluation with computed tomographic myelography. Mayo Clin Proc 1994; 69: 557-63.
Gu R, Zhu Q, Lin Y, Yang X, Gao Z, Tanaka Y: Dynamic canal encroachment of ligamentum flavum: an in vitro study of cadaveric specimens. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 187-90.
Machino M, Yukawa Y: Dynamic changes in dural sac and spinal cord cross-sectional area in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2011; 36(5): 399–403.
Wang B, Liu H, Wang H, Zhou D: Segmental instability in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe disc degeneration. Spine 2006; 31: 1327-31.
Wang WT, Olson SL, Campbell AH, Hanten WP, Gleeson PB: Effectiveness of physical therapy for patients with neck pain: An individualized approach using a clinical decision-making algorithm. Am J Phys Med Rehabilitation 2003; 82: 203-21.
Joghataei MT, Arab AM, Khaksar H: The effect of cervical traction combined with conventional therapy on grip strength on patients with cervical radiculopathy. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 879-87.
Vallee JN, Feydy A, Carlier RY, Mutschler C, Mompoint D, Vallee CA: Chronic cervical radiculopathy: lateral-approach periradicular corticosteroid injection. Radiology 2001; 218: 886-92.
Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednarik J, Smrcka V, Krbec M, Chaloupka R, et al: Predictive factors for spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12: 55-63.
Lieu AS, Howng SL: Clinical results of anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1998; 14: 212-6.
An HS, Evanich CJ, Nowicki BH, Haughton VM: Ideal thickness of Smith-Robinson graft for anterior cervical fusion. A cadaveric study with computed tomographic correlation. Spine 1993; 18: 2043-7.
Vaccaro AR, Ring D, Scuderi G, Garfin SR: Vertebral artery location in relation to the vertebral body as determined by two-dimensional computed tomography evaluation. Spine 1994; 19: 2637-41.
Raynor RB: Intraoperative ultrasound for immediate evaluation of anterior cervical decompression and discectomy. Spine 1997; 22: 389-5.
Park JB, Cho YS: Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 558-63.
Zdeblick TA, Ducker TB: The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions. Spine 1991; 16: 726-29.
Hong L, Kawaguchi Y: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to treat cervical spondylosis with sympathetic symptoms. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24: 11-4.
Wang JC, Hart RA, Emery SE, Bohlman HH: Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting. Spine 2003; 28: 1016-22.
Samartzis D, Shen FH, Lyon C, Phillps M, Goldberg EJ, An HS: Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Spine J 2004; 4: 636-43.
Ishida Y, Suzuki K, Ohmori K, Kikata Y, Hattori Y: Critical analysis of extensive cervical laminectomy. Neurosurgery 1999; 24: 215-22.
Lebl DR, Hughes A, Cammisa FP Jr, O’Leary PF: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. HSSJ 2011; 7: 170-8.
Yarbrough CK, Murphy RK, Ray WZ, Stewart TJ: The natural history and clinical presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Advances in Orthopedics 2012; 2012: 1-4.
Lin D, Ding Z, Lian K, Hong J, Zhai W: Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach. Indian J Orthop 2012; 46(1): 92-8.
Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, Donaldson W, Kang J: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 688-95.
Mitsunaga LK, Klineberg EO, Gupta MC. Laminoplasty techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical stenosis. Advances in Orthopedics 2012; 2012: 1-15.