Alba LH, Murillo R, Castillo JS

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 196-206
PDF size: 454.11 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective. A systematic review on efficacy and safety of smoking cessation counseling was developed. Materials and methods. The ADAPTE methodology was used with a search of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, and Cochrane. DELBI was used to select CPG with score over 60 in methodological rigor and applicability to the Colombian health system. Smoking cessation rates at 6 months were assessed according to counseling provider, model, and format. In total 5 CPG out of 925 references were selected comprising 44 systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Results. Physician brief counseling and trained health professionals’ intensive counseling (individual, group, proactive telephone) are effective with abstinence rates between 2.1% and 17.4%. Only practical counseling and motivational interview were found effective intensive interventions. The clinical effect of smoking cessation counseling is low and long term cessation rates uncertain. Conclusion. Cost-effectiveness analyses are recommended for the implementation of counseling in public health programs.

REFERENCES

1. Shafey O, Eriksen M, Shafey O, Ross H, Mackay J. The tobacco atlas. 3a. ed. Atlanta: Bookhouse Group Inc., 2009.

2. The World Bank. Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington: The World Bank, 1999.

3. Lemmens V, Oenema A, Knut IK, Bruj J. Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews. Eur J Cancer Preven 2008;17:535-544.

4. Fiore MC, Baker TB. Treating smokers in the health care setting. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1222-1231.

5. Silagy C, Stead LF. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;2:CD000165.

6. The ADAPTE Collaboration (2009). The ADAPTE process: resource toolkit for guideline adaptation. Version 2.0. [Consultado 2012 enero 16]. Disponible en: http://www.g-i-n.net.

7. Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany & Agency for Quality in Medicine. German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal (DELBI). Version 2005/2006 + Domain 8 (2008). [Consultado 2012 enero 20]. Disponible en: http://www.english.delbi.de.

8. Fiore MC, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guideline. Estados Unidos 2008

9. NICE Smoking cessation services in primary care, pharmacies, local authorities and workplaces. Inglaterra 2008

10. NICE Brief interventions and referral for smoking cessation in primary care and other settings. Inglaterra 2006

11. Ministry of Health New Zealand. Smoking cessation guidelines. Nueva Zelanda 2007

12. CEMBE. Clinical practice guideline on smoking cessation. Portugal 2008

13. Deutch Institute for Health Care CBO. Guideline treatment of tobacco dependence. Holanda 2006

14. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Integrating smoking cessation into daily nursing practice. Canadá 2007

15. Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Tobacco control. Estados Unidos 2007

16. University of Michigan Health System. Smoking cessation. Estados Unidos 2006

17. Ministerio de Salud y Medio Ambiente. Smoking cessation. Estados Unidos 2006

18. Duarte A, et al. Guía de práctica clínica basada en evidencia (metaanálisis) sobre estrategias para la cesación de tabaco en Colombia. Colombia 2005

19. Health Scotland and ASH Scotland. Smoking cessation update 2007. Supplement to the 2004 smoking cessation guidelines for Scotland Escocia 2007

20. CAN-ADAPTT. Dissemination and adoption of practice-informed tobacco treatment. Dynamic guidelines for tobacco control in Canada*. Canadá 2008

21. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Guía nacional para abordaje del tabaquismo. Uruguay 2009

22. Société Scientifique de Médecine Générale. Recommandations de bonne pratique. Arrêter de fumer. Bélgica 2005

23. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Bélisle P, Joseph L, Gervais A, O’Loughlin J et al. Behavioral interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2009;30:718-730.

24. Bock BC, Hudmon KS, Christian J, Graham AL, Bock FR. A tailored intervention to support pharmacy-based counseling for smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12:217-225.

25. Hettema JE, Hendricks PS. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010;78:868-884.

26. Heckman CJ, Egleston BL, Hofmann MT. Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control 2010;19:410-416.

27. Lai DT, Cahill K, Qin Y, Tang JL. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD006936.

28. Bize R, Burnand B, Mueller Y, Rège-Walther M, Cornuz J. Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2:CD004705.

29. Civljak M, Sheikh A, Stead LF, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;9:CD007078.

30. Graham AL, Cobb NK, Papandonatos GD, Moreno JL, Kang H, Tinkelman DG, et al. A randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:46-53.

31. Health Development Agency. Standard for training in smoking cessation treatments. London: Health Development Agency, 2003.

32. Ulbricht S, Klein G, Haug S, Gross B, Rumpf HJ, John U, et al. Smokers’ expectations toward the engagement of their general practitioner in discussing lifestyle behaviors. J Health Commun 2011;16:135-147.