2012, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Esp Med Quir 2012; 17 (4)
Biophysical profile to know fetal wellbeing
Serrano BMA, Beltrán CI, Serrano BJR
Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 300-307
PDF size: 181.39 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Scientific and technological advances have developed methods of real time ultrasound scanning, allowing precise observation and
secure various fetal motor activities, which for several years were impossible to perform. It turns out to be an excellent test to assess
fetal well-being, based on observation ultrasound of respiratory movements, body movements, muscle tone and amniotic fluid volume,
with the support of the study cardiotocographic that translates fetal heart rate reactivity. The study is easy and can be performed in
outpatient, and virtually no presents contraindications for the binomial mother-fetus. Their quantification is a procedure of monitoring
risks to the product based on the joint assessment of acute and chronic markers of fetus affections through a dynamic that reports
morphological and morphometric monitoring, as well as information of structures adjacent to the product of conception, which provides
a clinical framework to make the best therapeutic choice.
REFERENCES
Manning FA. Fetal medicine. Principles and practice. Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, 1995.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: Experience in 12,620 referred high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;151:343-350.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: Experience in 19,221 referred high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;157:880-884.
Manning FA., Morrison I, Harman CR, et al. The abnormal fetal biophysical profile score. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;162:918-927.
Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;156:527-533.
Ozkaya E, Baser E, Cinar M, Korkmaz V, Kucukozkan T. Does diurnal rhythm have an impact on fetal biophysical profile? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(4):335-8. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
Houben E, Adam R, Hachem J, Roseeuw D, et al. Clinical scoring and biophysical evaluation of nasolabial skin barrier damage caused by rhinorrhea. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59(5):296-300.
Turan S, Miller J, Baschat A. Integrated testing and management in fetal growth restriction. Semin Perinatol 2008;32(3):194-200.
Turan S, Turan O, Berg C, Moyano D, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30(5):750-756.
Baschat A, Galan H, Bhide A, Berg C, et al. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(1):41-47.
Sohail S. The uterine biophysical profile scoring validity. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005;15(9):556-558.
Baschat A, Gembruch U, Harman C. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(6):571-577.
Baschat A, Harman C. Antenatal assessment of the growth restricted fetus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001;13(2):161-168.
Lewis D, Adair C, Weeks J, Barrilleaux P, et al. T. A randomized clinical trial of daily non-stress testing versus biophysical profile in the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;181(6):1495-1499.
Manning FA. Fetal medicine. Principles and practice. Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, 1995.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: Experience in 12,620 referred high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;151:343-350.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: Experience in 19,221 referred high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;157:880-884.
Manning FA., Morrison I, Harman CR, et al. The abnormal fetal biophysical profile score. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;162:918-927.
Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;156:527-533.
Ozkaya E, Baser E, Cinar M, Korkmaz V, Kucukozkan T. Does diurnal rhythm have an impact on fetal biophysical profile? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(4):335-8. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
Houben E, Adam R, Hachem J, Roseeuw D, et al. Clinical scoring and biophysical evaluation of nasolabial skin barrier damage caused by rhinorrhea. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59(5):296-300.
Turan S, Miller J, Baschat A. Integrated testing and management in fetal growth restriction. Semin Perinatol 2008;32(3):194-200.
Turan S, Turan O, Berg C, Moyano D, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30(5):750-756.
Baschat A, Galan H, Bhide A, Berg C, et al. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(1):41-47.
Sohail S. The uterine biophysical profile scoring validity. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005;15(9):556-558.
Baschat A, Gembruch U, Harman C. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(6):571-577.
Baschat A, Harman C. Antenatal assessment of the growth restricted fetus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001;13(2):161-168.
Lewis D, Adair C, Weeks J, Barrilleaux P, et al. T. A randomized clinical trial of daily non-stress testing versus biophysical profile in the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;181(6):1495-1499.
Full text