medigraphic.com
ISSN 1727-897X (Electronic)

2012, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Medisur 2012; 10 (5)

Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty

Canto VBF

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 375-379
PDF size: 304.28 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Rhinoplasty helps improving functional and aesthetic aspects in patients.
Objective: To describe the results of primary and secondary rhinoplasty.
Methods: A descriptive study was conducted at the Dr. Gustavo Aldereguía Lima General University Hospital of Cienfuegos. It included 139 patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The following variables were analyzed: type of rhinoplasty, type of anesthesia, surgical technique, and aesthetic results.
Results: According to the type of rhinoplasty 25 surgeries for bent nose were performed, 67 for basic rhinoplasties and 47 for tip rhinoplasties. For bent noses a novel surgical technique was used with excellent results, the basic rhinoplasty and the tip rhinoplasty were performed trough open endonasal way and local anesthesia was used. We performed 17 secondary rhinoplasties, for a second surgery was necessary for those patients.
Conclusions: Satisfactory results are obtained in rhinoplasty when using local anesthesia. The new proposed technique lead to satisfactory results.


REFERENCES

  1. Bonaparte F, Coggiano A. Percepción de perfiles. Primera parte. CAO. 2010 ; LXVII (208): 12-6. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  2. Bonaparte F, Coggiano A. Percepción de perfiles. Segunda parte. CAO. 2010 ; LXVII (210): 18-25. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  3. Canto Vidal B, Fuentes Febles D. Perfiloplastia. Nuevo concepto de tratamiento. Medisur [revista en Internet]. 2009 [ cited 23 Ene 2011 ] ; 7 (1): [aprox. 13p]. Avaidable from: http://www.medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/631/817. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  4. Turrubiates Calcaneo EM, Revilla Macías DA, Vera Domínguez J, Telles Galicia DM, Marín Méndez H, Gómez Brito E. Análisis costo efectividad de la rinoplastia y rinoseptoplastia con anestesia local en el Hospital Central Militar. Rev Sanid Militar Mex. 2009 ; 63 (2): 47-55. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  5. Miranda N, Gil C, Gómez T, Aponte C, Celis G, Gil García C. Injerto cartilaginoso autólogo en el manejo de la proyección y rotación de la punta nasal en rinoseptoplastia. Acta Otorrinolaringol. 2007 ; 19 (2): 74-81. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  6. Morera Serna E, Escobar Forero CM, Pedroza Campos F, Frontera Juan G. Cambios a largo plazo de la punta nasal en pacientes intervenidos de rinoplastia primaria mediante técnica de los nuevos domos y del estandarte. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2008 ; 59 (8): 390-8. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  7. Meza Pérez A. Rinoplastia. Experiencia personal. Cir Plast. 2005 ; 15 (2): 100-10. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  8. Timperley D, Stow N, Srubiski A, Harvey R, Marcells G. Functional outocomes of structured nasal tip refinement. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010 ; 12 (5): 298-304. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  9. Jamenson J, Perry A, Ritter E. High septal osteotomy in rhinoplasty for the deviated nose. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2006 ; 56 (1): 40-5. [Buscar en Google Scholar]

  10. Must SP, Murakami CS. Nasal osteotomies: anatomy, planning and technique. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2002 ; 10 (3): 279-85. [Buscar en Google Scholar]




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com