Puntunet BML, Ortega VMC, Montesinos JG, Leija HC, Quintero BMM, Cruz AG, González FNE

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 12-16
PDF size: 52.36 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Nursing diagnoses described problems of health, real, potential or welfare; a clinical trial of the person, family or community, which is obtained after the assessment they are. Objective: Identify the most frequent nursing diagnoses by necessity in the person with cardiovascular condition. Material and methods: descriptive, transversal and prospective study from October 2007 to December 2008. Sample for convenience of n = 667 comprehensive assessments of cardiovascular nursing Virginia Henderson approach; It included all assessment to people of all ages and hospitalized at the National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chavez and eliminated those where there was the nursing diagnosis or this was the unreadable. Data analysis in Excel 2003 with frequencies and percentages. Results: Of the total of valuations; 54% are male. Altered more often need: oxygenation with 68%. Were a total of 113 diagnostic labels, 81% belong to the taxonomy Nursing Diagnosis: Definitions & Classification (NANDA) and 19% in format: problem, etiology, signs and symptoms. In general, the insomnia, the risk of falling and the deterioration of physical mobility are more common in the patient with cardiovascular alteration labels. For the need of oxygen, most frequent labels are: ineffective breathing pattern (35.7%) and impairment of gas exchange (31.8%). Conclusion: The diagnostic labels are directly related to cardiovascular clinical manifestations and are applicable for the development of nursing care plans. There is also a direct correspondence of cardiovascular clinical entity with the deterioration of the oxygenation and security need.

REFERENCES

1. NANDA-I. Diagnósticos enfermeros: Definiciones y clasificación 2007-2008. España: Elsevier; 2008.

2. Secretaría de Salud, Subsecretaría de Innovación y Calidad. Perfiles de enfermería. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2005.

3. Montesinos JG, Ortega VMC, Leija HC, Quintero BMM, Cruz AG, Suárez VM. Validación de un instrumento de valoración de enfermería cardiovascular con el enfoque de Virginia Henderson. Rev Mex Enferm Cardiol. 2011; 19(1): 13-20.

4. Lefevre M, Dupuis A. Juicio clínico en cuidados enfermeros. Barcelona: Masson; 1995.

5. Luis RMT. Los diagnósticos enfermeros. Revisión, crítica y guías. Barcelona: Masson; 2000.

6. Gordon M. Manual de diagnósticos de enfermería. 11ª ed. España: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana; 2007.

7. Avalos TE, Silé RV, Roche MH, Gómez RJ. Diagnósticos de enfermería. Historia y diagnósticos más frecuentes en afecciones cardiovasculares. Revista Electrónica de Portalesmedicos.com [internet] 2007 [Consultado en marzo 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.portalesmedicos.com/publicaciones/articles/838/1/Diagnostico-de-Enfermeria-Evolucion-historica-y-diagnosticos-mas-frecuentes-en-afecciones-cardiovasculares.html

8. Ariza OC. Diagnósticos de enfermería frecuentes en el paciente con alteraciones del sistema cardiovascular. Rev Mex Enferm Cardiol. 2003; 11(2): 77-81.

9. 9 . Lara LMD, Segura SGC. Diagnósticos e intervenciones de enfermería en el paciente ambulatorio con cardiopatía isquémica. Enfermería en Cardiología. 2009; 46(1): 17-22.

10. Silva VM, Araujo TL, López MVO. Evolution of nursing diagnoses for children with congenital heart disease. Rev Latinoam Enfermagem. 2006; 14(4): 561-568.

11. Pereira JMV, Cavalcanti ACD, Santana RF, Cassiano KM, Queluci GC, Guimarães TCF. Diagnósticos de enfermagem de pacientes hospitalizados com doenças cardiovasculares. Esc Anna Nery. 2011; 15(4): 737-745.

12. Salgado PO, Chianca TCM. Identificación y mapeo de los diagnósticos y acciones de enfermería en Unidad de Terapia Intensiva. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. [internet] 2011 [citado 10 de julio] 2012; 19(4): [08 pantallas]. Disponible en: www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

13. Aguilera-Rivera M, Crespo-Knopfler S, Rivas-Espinosa JG. Construcción del diagnóstico de enfermería en el alumno de nivel licenciatura. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011; 19(2): 81-85.