medigraphic.com

2009, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2009; 47 (3)

The Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve by Sonography in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Sabag-Ruiz E, Higuera-Lugo CO, Ornelas-Aguirre JM, Gómez-Alcalá AV

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 271-276
PDF size: 60.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: to measure the median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) at the carpal tunnel (CT) level by sonography (S) in a Mexican population.
Methods: a comparative cross-sectional design study with a non probabilistic sampling with 50 women and 50 men in good health were submitted for measuring MNCSA at the level of the CT. Other variables like sex; side and degree of daily hand activity were also studied. The analysis was made by descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: the mean MNCSA was 0.063 ± 0.015 cm², in women; in men it was 0.072 ± 0.018 cm²; the difference was significant (p ± 0.004). The median MNCSA among women was 0.062 cm² in the right side and 0.060 cm² in the left (percentile 90 for both hands of 0.084 cm²); in men, it was of 0.070 cm² in the right hand and of 0.069 cm² in the left (percentile 90 for both hands of 0.097 cm²). The difference between women and men was significant in each side, but not between right and left hands (p = 0.21). There was no correlation between age and MNCSA on either side, or with hand activity.
Conclusions: a MNCSA value of 0.1 cm² for men and 0.09 cm² for women is proposed as standard parameter for the Mexican population.


REFERENCES

  1. Testut L, Latarjet A. Anatomía humana. Tomo I. Osteología y artrología. Barcelona, España: Salvat Editores; 1977.

  2. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Gandolfo N, Valle M, Simonetti S, Derchi LE. US of nerve entrapments in osteofibrous tunnels of the upper and lower limbs. Radiographics 2000;20(Suppl):S199-S217.

  3. Stewart JD. Compression and entrapment neuropathies. En: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, editores. Peripheral neuropathy. Third edition. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 1993. p. 1354-1379.

  4. Pedrosa CS, Casanova R. Diagnóstico por imagen. Vol. III. Madrid. España: McGraw-Hill; 2003. p. 506.

  5. Gelberman RH, Eaton R, Urbaniak JR. Peripheral nerve compression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75(12):1854-1878.

  6. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Cohen M, Graif M. Ultrasound of peripheral nerves. J Radiol 2005;86(12 Pt 2):1869-1878.

  7. Nakamichi K, Tachibana S. Distance between the median nerve and ulnar neurovascular bundle: clinical significance with ultrasonographically assisted carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1998; 23(5):870-874.

  8. Nakamichi K, Tachibana S. Ultrasonographically assisted carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1997; 22(5):853-862.

  9. Chen P, Maklad N, Redwine M, Zelitt D. Dynamic high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168(2):533-537.

  10. Lee D, van Holsbeeck MT, Janevski PK, Ganos DL, Ditmars DM, Darian VB. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37 (4):859-872.

  11. Buchberger W, Schon G, Strasser K, Jungwirth W. High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10(10): 531-537.

  12. Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lenner M, Schmidauer C. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1992;159(4):793-798.

  13. Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(3):681-683.

  14. Pedrosa CS, Casanova R. Diagnóstico por imagen. Vol. III. Madrid. España: McGraw-Hill; 2003. p. 546.

  15. Nakamichi K, Tachibana S. Restricted motion of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1995;20(4):460-464.

  16. Sugimoto H, Miyaji N, Ohsawa T. Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of median nerve circulation with dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;190(2):459-466.

  17. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Lo SK, Fu M, Wong KS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 2004;232(1):93-99.

  18. Kele H, Verheggen R, Bittermann HJ, Reimers CD. The potential value of ultrasonography in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 2003; 61(3):389-391.

  19. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: subs-tantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology 2004; 43(7):887-895.

  20. Mallouhi A, Pültzl P, Trieb T, Piza H, Bodner G. Predictors of carpal tunnel syndrome: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler sonography. AJR 2006;186(5):1240-1245.

  21. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46(7):1914-1921.

  22. Kotevoglu N and Gulbahce-Saglam S. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and its relevance to clinical evaluation. Joint Bone Spine 2005;72(2):142-145.

  23. Ziswiler HR, Reichenbach S, Vögelin E, Bachmann LM, Villiger PM, Jüni P. Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(1):304-311.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com