medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3046 (Electronic)

2012, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Mil 2012; 41 (2)

Use of lumboscopic surgery in patients cared for at the National Center for Minimal Access Surgery

González LT, Machado ÁM, Rodríguez VE, Suárez MME, Bautista Oj

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page:
PDF size: 55.42 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: at first, urologists accessed the upper urinary tract transperitoneally. Later on they developed the lumboscopic approach or retroperitoneoscopy, accessing the retroperitoneum directly, thus preventing intra-abdominal lesions and the contamination of the abdominal cavity with urine.
Objective: characterize the results obtained with the use of lumboscopic surgery as surgical treatment.
Methods: a retrospective longitudinal descriptive study was conducted at the National Center for Minimal Access Surgery with 327 patients, who underwent lumboscopic approach surgery.
Results: the most common surgical interventions were ureterolithotomy (55.9 %) and simple nephrectomy (17.7 %). Mean surgical time was 120 min. Conversion was required in 2.5 % of the patients. Transoperative complications occurred in 10.7 % of the patients, and only 1.2 % of them were major. Hypercapnia was a transoperative complication occurring in 11.9 % in relation to the direct route of access to the retroperitoneum.
Conclusions: ureterolithotomy was the most common intervention. Surgical times were in accordance with the complexity of procedures. Feasibility of this route of access was due to its low percentage of conversion to a different surgical access route. Its safety was due to its low rate of major complications, which makes it useful for urological surgical interventions of the upper urinary tract.


REFERENCES

  1. Nouira Y, Kallel Y, Binous M, Dahmoul H, Horchani A. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy: initial experience and review of literature. J Endourol. 2004;18(6):557-61.

  2. Seo Y, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Whan J, Slik J. Operative Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. Korean J Urol. 2011;52(4):279-83.

  3. Hemal A, Wadhwa S, Kumar M, Gupta N. Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis. J Urol. 1999;162(1):35-9.

  4. Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Weber M, Janetschek G, Fahlenkamp D, Henkel T, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: The experience of the Laparoscopy Working Group of the German Urologic Association. J Urol. 1998;160(1):18-21.

  5. Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol. 1992;148(4):1137-9.

  6. Santinelli F, Mias F, Manduley A. Lumboscopia: experiencia con la técnica en Berazategui, primeros 600 casos. Arch Esp Urol. 2007;60(3):279-86.

  7. Huri E, Basok E, Ugurlu O, Gurbuz C, Akgül T, Ozgök Y, et al. Experiences in laparoscopic removal of upper ureteral stones: multicenter analysis of cases, based on the Turk Uro Lap Group. J Endourol. 2010;24(8):1279-82.

  8. González T, Casanova G, Rodríguez E, Castillo M. Cirugía mínimamente invasiva en Urología. Resultados de su aplicación en un centro referencial. international. Braz J Urol. 2006;32(Supl 2):61.

  9. González T, Rodríguez E, Hernández D, Machado M, Faife B, Bautista J, et al. Resultados de la aplicación de una técnica estandarizada de ureterolitotomía lumboscópica. Actas Urol Esp. 2010;34(No. especial):104.

  10. Machado Álvarez M de la C, González León T, Olive González JB, Nodal Ortega J, Quintana Pajon I, Sánchez EC. Anestesia en procedimientos lumboscópicos: Experiencia en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Reanim [Internet]. 2011 Ago [citado 20 Jul 2011 ];10(2):122-134. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/scar/vol_10_2_11/ane06211.htm

  11. Skolarikos A, Papatsoris A, Albanis S, Assimos D. Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review. Urol Res. 2010;38(5):337-44.

  12. Farooq Qadri SJ, Khan N, Khan M. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy —A single centre 10 year experience. Int J Surg. 2010;9(2):160-4.

  13. Sun C, Xu K, Xia G, Ding Q. Middle and upper segmental ureterolithotomy with laparoscopy. Urol. 2009;74(Suppl 4A):S352.

  14. Castillo O, Cortes O. Complicaciones en cirugía laparoscópica urológica. Actas Urol Esp. 2006:30(5):541-54.

  15. Jeong B, Park H, Byeon S, Kim H. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21(3):441-4.

  16. Stolzenburg J, Aedtner B, Olthoff D, Koenig K, Rabenal R, Filos KS et al. Anaesthetic considerations for endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006 Sep;98(3):508-13.

  17. Hruza M, Türk C, Frede T, Rassweiler J. Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery. Urologe A. 2008;47(5):578-86.

  18. Gill I, Clayman R, Albala D. Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: An international perspective. Urology. 1998;52(4):566-71.

  19. Almeida G, Heldwein F, Graziotin T, Schmitt C, Telöken C. Estudio prospectivo que compara laparoscopia y cirugía abierta para el tratamiento de cálculos ureterales impactados. Actas Urol Esp. 2009;33(10):1108-14.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com