medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-297X (Print)

2011, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2011; 48 (2)

Assessment of occlusal contacts in implant-based single temporal prostheses in a semi-adjusted articulator using the facial arch

Andrade ZC, Franco AL, Ribeiro DI

Language: Portugués
References: 20
Page: 113-120
PDF size: 169.42 Kb.


ABSTRACT

To assess the number of occlusal contacts achieved in temporal prostheses mounted in a semi-adjusted articulator using the facial arch and the Camper plane. Ten patients treated in a private clinic were selected to be rehabilitated with prostheses in previously placed single implants. For each patient two temporal prostheses were designed obtained under different conditions: (1) model mounting using facial arch and (2) Camper plane mounting. Prostheses were made and adjusted in the laboratory and placed only by an operator. The occlusal contacts achieved in each condition were photographed being assessed and quantified by a second professional not involved with the mounting conditions. Results obtained were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test with a 5 % significance level. There was not a statistically difference between the number of occlusal contacts when prostheses were made with facial arch or Camper plane (p= 0.113). The temporal dental prosthesis confection for single implants, semi-adjusted articulator using the Camper plane, not differ very much from the facial arch use, according to the number of resulting occlusal contacts.


REFERENCES

  1. Nishioka RS, Almeida EES. Método de obtenção de registros oclusais em PPFrevisão de literatura. Pós-Grad Rev Fac Odontol. 2001;4(2):79-83.

  2. Okeson JP. Fundamentos de oclusão e desordens temporomandibulares. São Paulo: Editora Artes Médicas LTDA; 1992.

  3. Okeson JP. Tratamento das desordens temporomandibulares e oclusão. São Paulo: Editora Artes Médicas LTDA; 2000.

  4. Baba K, Tsukiyama Y, Clark GT. Reliability, validity and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):83-9.

  5. Cardoso AC. Oclusão para você e para mim. São Paulo: Editora Santos LTDA; 2003.

  6. Samet N, Smidt A, Samet N, Weiss EI. A clinical and cost-benefit evaluation of five facebows. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:511-5.

  7. Ercoli C, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Galindo D. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and a alternative technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:237-41.

  8. Preston JA. Reassessment of the mandibular transverse horizontal axis theory. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:605-13.

  9. Choi DG, Bowley JF, Marx DB, Lee S. Reliability of an ear-bow arbitrary face-bow transfer instrument. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:150-6.

  10. Bowley JF, Michaels GC, Lai TW, Lin PP. Reliability of a facebow transfer procedure. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:491-8.

  11. Ellis E, Tharanon W, Gambrell K. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50(6):562-7.

  12. Heydecke G, Akkad AS, Wolkewitz M, Vogeler M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Patient ratings of chewing ability from a randomised crossover trial: lingualised vs. first premolar/canine-guided occlusion for complete dentures. Gerodontology. 2007;24(2):77-86.

  13. Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Wolkewitz M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):107-16.

  14. Kawai Y, Murakamia H, Shariatic B, Klemetti E, Blomfield JV, Billette L, et al. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:659-68.

  15. Shodadai SP, Türp JC, Gerds T, Strub JR. Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance? Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(6):517-22.

  16. Carlsson GE. Dental Occlusion: modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics. Odontology. 2009;97:8-17.

  17. Kubrak J. Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 1998;44:237-49.

  18. Cabot LB. Using articulators to enhance clinical practice. Br Dent J. 1998;184(6):272-6.

  19. Weiner S. Biomechanics of occlusion and the articulator. Dent Clin North Am. 1995;39(2):257-84.

  20. Squier RS. Jaw relation records for fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48:471-86.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com