medigraphic.com
Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

2011, Number 37

<< Back Next >>

Oral 2011; 12 (37)

Efficacy clinic comparasion the Clorhexidine 1% varnish vs Sodium Fluoride 5% varnish in the preventive of caries disease of firsth molars

Trejo TSE, Guerrero ÁF, Oliver PR

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 702-706
PDF size: 68.83 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objetive: evaluate and compare the efficacy of Clorhexidine (CHX) 1% varnish and sodium Fluoride (NaF) 5% Varnish like topic agents preventive of caries disease in pediatric patients. Introduction: Decay is a multifactorial disease that results in a softening of the hard tissues of the tooth. The first molar permanent erupciona between 5 and 7 years of age, has no predecessor and is one of the most teeth affected by the disease. Materials and methods: for this randomized comparative study included 52 children between 6 and 8 years old. The ceo was used to select patients with a higher rate of decay to 3 and at least one permanent first molar tooth decay free to undertake the implementation of preventative agent. We applied randomly CHX or NaF measuring PCO at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: In the group treated with fluoride was PCO reported a baseline 3. 78 and post-6 months this figure increased to 4.47 (p=.03). In group B treated with Chlorhexidine saw a PCO baseline 3. 72 and later to six months of observation this figure increased to 4. 23 (p =. 60). Conclusions: the present study found that in group A treated with NaF there a statistically significant difference between the rate of decay and the basal rate of decay compared to the end result of the rate of decay and the basal rate of decay final group B is treatment with CHX, however these results are not sufficient to demonstrate that the CHX was more effective than NaF as a preventative agent of decay due to the results between the two groups were very similar although in group B and were not significant difference.


REFERENCES

  1. Loe, H. Oral hygiene in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease. Int Dent J 2000; 50:129-39.

  2. Sánchez Pére, L., Acosta-Gío, A.E., Méndez-Ramírez, I. A cluster analysis model for caries risk assessment. Arch Oral Biol. 2004; 49(9):719-25.

  3. Horowitz, H.S. Decision-making for national programs of community fluoride use. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28:321-9.

  4. Sampaio, F.C., Nazmul-Hossain, A.N.M., von der Fehr, F.R., Arneberg, P. Dental caries and sugar intake of children from rural areas with different water fluoride levels in Parabia, Brazil. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28:307-13.

  5. Newbrun, E. The case for reducing the current council on dental therapeutics fluoride supplementation schedule. J Public Health Dent. 1999; 59:263-8.

  6. Anderson, M.H., Bales, D.J., Omnell, K.A. Modern management of dental caries: the cutting edge is not the dental bur. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 Jun; 124(6):36-4.

  7. Gibbons, R.J., and van Houte, J. Bacteriology of Dental Caries. In Shaw JH, Sweeney EA, Cappacino CC and Miller SM. Texbook of Oral Biology. Saunder, Philadelphia, 1978:975-91.

  8. Moss, S.J. Understanding the saliva, fluoride, and diet axis. Contemp Esthet Restor Pract 2001; 5:8-10.

  9. Kannellis, M.J. Caries risk assessment and prevention: strategies for head start and WIC. J Public Health Dent. 2000; 60:210-7.

  10. Ten-Cate, J.M. Current concepts on the theories of the mechanism of action of fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57:325-9.

  11. MacDonald, J.B. Microbiology of Caries. In: Sognnaes RF., ed: Chemistry and the prevention of Dental Caries. C. C. Thomas, Springfield, III; 1962: 89-125.

  12. Gibbons, R.J., and van Houte, J. Bacteriology of Dental Caries. In Shaw JH, Sweeney EA, Cappacino CC and Miller SM. Texbook of Oral Biology. Saunder, Philadelphia, 1978:975-91.

  13. Loesche, W.J. Dental caries: A treatable infection. Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1982:1-558.

  14. Zickert, I., Emilson, C.G., Krasse, B. Streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli and dental heah in 13-14-year-old Swedish children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1982 Apr; 10(2):77-1.

  15. Loesche, W.J., Eklund, S., Earnest, R., Burt, B. Longitudinal investigation of bacteriology of humane fissure decay: epidemiological studies in molars shortly after eruption. Infection & Immunity. 1984; 46(3):765-2 (abstract).

  16. Boyar, R.M., Bowden, G.H. The Microflora Associated with the Progression of Incipient Carious Lesions in Teeth of Children Living in a Water- Fluoridated Area. Caries Res 1985; 19:298-6.

  17. Emilson, C.G., Krasse, B. Support for and implications of the specific plaque hypothesis. Scand J Dent Res. 1985 Apr; 93(2): 96-04.

  18. Bowden, G.H. Mutans streptococci caries and chlorhexidine. J Can Dent Assoc.1996; 62(9):700-07.

  19. Li, Y., Wang, W. Predicting caries In permanent teeth from caries in primary teeth: an eight-year cohort study. J Dent Res 2002 Aug; 81 (8): 561-6.

  20. Tedjosasongko, U., Kozai, K. Initial acquisition and transmission of mutans streptococci in children at day nursey. ASDC J Dent Child 2002 Sep-Dec; 69 (3): 284-8, 234-5.

  21. Wheeler, N.N. Anatomía dental, fisiología y oclusión. 7ª ed. México: McGraw Hill; 1995.

  22. Cabrera, G., Tascón, J., Lucumí, D. Creencias en salud: historia, constructos y aportes del modelo. Rev Fac Nal Salud Pública 2000; 19: 91-101.

  23. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Educación para la salud: Manual sobre educación sanitaria en atención primaria de salud. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 1989. p. 6-20.

  24. Rong, W.S., Bian, J.Y., Wang, W.J., Wang, J.D. Effectiveness of an oral health education and caries prevention program in kindergartens in China. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 412-416.

  25. Rölla, G., Löe, H., Schiøtt, C.R. Affinity of Chlorhexidine Gluconate to hydroxyapatite and to Salivary Mucins. Caries Res. 1971; 5:23.

  26. Bowden, G.H. Mutans streptococci caries and chlorhexidine. J Can Dent Assoc.1996; 62(9):700-7.

  27. Grundemann, L.J., Timmerman, M.F., van der Velden, U., van der Weijden, G.A. [Reduction of stain, plaque and gingivitis by mouth rinsing with chlorhexidine and peroxyborate] Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2002 Jul;109 (7):255-9. [Article in Dutch].

  28. Jenkins, S., Addy, M., Newcombe, R.G. A comparison of cetylpyridinium chloride, triclosan and chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations for effects on plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontol. 1994 Jul; 21(6):441-4.

  29. Twetman, S., Petersson, L.G. Efficacy of a chlorhexidine and a chlorhexidine- fluoride varnish mixture to decrease interdental levels of mutans streptococci. Caries Res. 1997; 31(5):361-5.

  30. Baca, P. Trabajo Original de Investigación. Resumen: Influencia de la discontinuidad y del riesgo de caries en la eficacia de un programa de barniz de clorhexidina. Granada, 2003. 1-58.

  31. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods 4th ed., Geneva, WHO 1997.

  32. Rioboo, R. Índices en Odontología. Generalidades. Índices de Salud e Índices para Evaluar la Caries Dental. En: Rioboo R. Odontología Preventiva y Odontología Comunitaria. Madrid: Ediciones Avances 2002; 30: 859-78.

  33. Anusavice, K.J. Dental caries: risk assessment and treatment solutions for an elderly population. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002 Oct; 23(10 Suppl):12-0.

  34. Brown, L.R., White, J.O., Horton, I.M., Dreizen, S., Streckfuss, J.L. “Effect of continuous fluoride gel use on plaque fluoride retention and microbial activity” Dent Res. 1983; 62(6):746-1.

  35. Araujo, A.M., Naspitz, G.M., Chelotti, A., Cai, S. Effect of Cervitec on mutans streptococci in plaque and on caries formation on occlusal fissures of erupting permanent molars. Caries Res 2002 Sep-Oct; 36(5):373-6.

  36. Tascón, J.E., Cabrera, G. Algunas creencias sobre susceptibilidad y severidad de la caries en adolescentes del Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Colomb Med 2005; 36: 140-145.

  37. Krasse, B. Biological factors as indicators of future caries. Int Dent J. 1988 Dec; 38(4):219-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com