Cruz GAC, Díaz CA, Méndez SJE

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page:
PDF size: 159.45 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The composite resin inlays are a low cost alternative which seeks improvements to the direct filling methods meet the challenges of the marginal adaptation, location of proximal contacts, allows us to improve the restoration dental anatomy and overcome the phenomenon of contraction at large sections of material polymerized outside the dental cavity. The objective of this article was to show the use of the composite with indirect technique how an alternative to easy handle and significant clinical results with the structural involvement of molars. The article reports two cases of composite resin inlay onlay in two permanent molars structurally affected, one endodontically treated. The collection of models is performed by the arch alginate impression of the teeth selected, making silicone light casting the prepared tooth and the rest in type III dental stone to obtain a die of work on drawing up the inlay in incremental technique. The cementation process oral cavity is carried out with dual cure resin cement. To control at six months for signs of a leak or marginal jet we used air-dried syringe, explorer and periapical X-Ray. The clinical examination and radiographic analysis revealed a good performance of the restorations in the absence of mismatch or marginal pigmentation. In conclusions the use of the composite inlays in molars with structural involvement with indirect technique is an alternative to easy handle and significant clinical results.

REFERENCES

1. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater. 2007;23(7):829-39.

2. Tsitrou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Van Noort R. A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent. 2010;38(1):16-22.

3. Minami H, Suzuki S, Murahara S, Saimi Y, Minesaki Y, Tanaka T. Effect of fiber-premixed indirect resin composite substructure on fracture resistance of MOD composite inlays adhered with two different adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(5):565-70.

4. Poskus LT, Latempa AM, Chagas MA, Silva EM, Leal MP, Guimarães JG. Influence of post-cure treatments on hardness and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlay restorations: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):617-22.

5. Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, Gagliani M, Ferrari M, Gherlone E, et al. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent. 2009;37(8):610-5.

6. Ritter AV, Ghaname E, Pimenta LA. Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives. J Dent. 2009;37(1):59-64.

7. Lee IB, An W, Chang J, Um CM. Influence of ceramic thickness and curing mode on the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dual-cured resin cements. Dent Mater. 2008;24(8):1141-7.

8. Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations. Dent Mater. 2010;26(6):608-15.

9. Annunziata M, Aversa R, Apicella A, Annunziata A, Apicella D, Buonaiuto C, et al. In vitro biological response to a light-cured composite when used for cementation of composite inlays. Dent Mater. 2006;22(12):1081-5.

10. Arrais CA, Rueggeberg FA, Waller JL, de Goes MF, Giannini M. Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. J Dent. 2008;36(6):418-26.

11. Farrell CV, Johnson GH, Oswald MT, Tucker RD. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(4):287-92.

12. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Wimmer J, Lang R, Kolbeck C, Bürgers R, et al. Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical trial begun 2003. Dent Mater. 2009;25(5):601-4.

13. Karakaya S, Sengun A, Ozer F. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(6):448-53.

14. Magne P, Cascione D. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(5):354-61.

15. Ereifej N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Edge strength of indirect restorative materials. J Dent. 2009;37(10):799-806.

16. Yamamoto T, Nishiura R. Marginal toughness of bonded dental ceramics evaluated by determination of the crack length. J Dent. 2006;34(2):146-54.

17. Baroudi K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Edge-strength of flowable resin-composites. J Dent. 2008;36(1):63-8.

18. Kim SH, Watts DC. In vitro study of edge-strength of provisional polymer-based crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater. 2007;23(12):1570-3.

19. Watts DC, Issa M, Ibrahim A, Wakiaga J, Al-Samadani K, Al-Azraqi M, et al. Edge strength of resin-composite margins. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):129-33.

20. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):279-87.

21. Belli R, Pelka M, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. In vitro wear gap formation of self-adhesive resin cements: a CLSM evaluation. J Dent. 2009;37(12):984-93.

22. Soares CJ, Celiberto L, Dechichi P, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Marginal integrity and microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays: SEM and stereomicroscopic evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2005;19(4):295-301.

23. Ferreira MC, Vieira RS. Marginal leakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2008;36(5):322-5.

24. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(3):225-32.

25. Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, LongXing N. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(1):6-12.

26. Magne P, Knezevic A. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars. Dent Mater. 2009;25(10):1264-8.

27. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(2):114-22.