medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2011, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2011; 50 (4)

Achievements and challenges of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Cuba

Zamora SO, Rodríguez LCCA, Hernández GJM, Legrá LJ, Peña PNE, Silvera GJR

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 509-516
PDF size: 147.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: to know the results from the standardization of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Cuba.
Methods: a descriptive and retrospective study was conducted be means of a survey completed by 16 groups of minimal access surgery from university hospital in 9 provinces of our country to define the character, conversions, behavior in face of biliary tract lithiasis, perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Results: it was possible to obtain data related to 56 878 surgical interventions performed from the onset of activity in these centers up to November, 2007 defining the character, conversions, behavior in face of a biliary tract lithiasis and perioperative morbidity and mortality. The laparoscopic approach was used in the 80.7 % of cases, elective in the 97.1 %, with conversion rates of 1.4 %, morbidity of 0.58 % and mortality of 0.10 %. There was predominance of conversion and exploration of conventional for in face of the choledochal lithiasis finding.
Conclusions: results of standardization of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Cuba are excellent, but it is necessary to extend its use as a tool in the treatment of the biliary lithiasis complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Kleiman A. Una Historia de la Colecistectomía Laparoscópica [homepage en internet]. Cirugest. Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo [citado 9 de septiembre de 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.cirugest.com/htm/revisio nes/cir0107/cap16.pdf

  2. Prados O. Historia de la colecistectomía laparoscópica. Revista del Hospital "Ramos Mejía" [serie en internet] 2004 [citado 5 de octubre de 2009];IX(3). Disponible en: http://www.ramosmejia.org.ar/r/200403/colelap.pdf

  3. Kenneth J. Iatrogenic Biliary Injuries: Classification, Identification, and Management. Surg Clin N Am. 2008;88(5):1329-43.

  4. Rodríguez LS. Costes: colecistectomía laparoscópica frente a colecistectomía convencional. Rev Cubana Cir [serie en internet]. 2006 [citado 5 de octubre de 2009];45(3-4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932006000300005&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  5. David R. Elwood. Cholecystitis. Surg Clin N Am. 2008;88(5):1241-52.

  6. De la Concepción de la Peña AH. Resultados del tratamiento laparoscópico de la colecistitis aguda. Rev Cubana Cir [serie en internet]. 2009 [citado 5 de octubre de 2009];48(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034 -74932009000200004&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  7. Bahten LC. Acute and chronic cholecystopathies: analysis comparative of the rates and causes of conversion to laparotomy. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009 Apr;36(2):135-8.

  8. Chandio A. Factors influencing the successful completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. Oct-Dec 2009;13(4):581-6.

  9. Priego P. Resultados de la colecistectomía laparoscópica en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel tras 17 años de experiencia. Rev Esp Enferm Dig [serie en internet]. 2009 [citado 15 de enero de 2010];101(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082009000100003&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  10. Fischer JE. Is damage to the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy an inherent risk of the operation? Am J Surg. 2009 Jun;197(6):829-32.

  11. Wage A. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg. 2006;141(12):1207-13.

  12. Yuhsin V. Bile Duct Injuries in the Era of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies. Surg Clin N Am. 2010;90(4):787-802.

  13. Kharbutli B. Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov;12(11):1973-80.

  14. Griniatsos J. Exploración laparoscópica de la vía biliar. Experiencia de una unidad especializada. Cir Esp. 2002;71(6):292-5.

  15. Ghazal AH. Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique. Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46.

  16. Mandry AC. Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct lithiasis associated with gallbladder lithiasis. Cir Esp. 2008;83(1):28-32.

  17. Urbach DR. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2001 Jan;15(1):4-13.

  18. Martin DJ. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [serie en internet]. 2006 [citado 15 de enero de 2010];issue 2(art. no. CD003327). Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2/pdf/standard

  19. Kube R. How safe is laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Chir. 2009 Apr;134(2):155-8.

  20. Huang X. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in China: analysis of 39,238 cases. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. Nov 1997;35(11):654-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com