medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2011; 50 (1)

Total abdominal hysterectomy versus minimal-invasive hysterectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Aragón PFJ, Expósito EM, Fleitas PO, Morgado PA, Mirabal RC, Aragón PL

Language: Spanish
References: 47
Page: 82-95
PDF size: 326.84 Kb.


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. At the present time three types of hysterectomies are used: the vaginal hysterectomy and the minimal-invasive hysterectomy (MIH). The objective of present research was to compare the MIH and the total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in women presenting with benign uterine diseases.
METHODS. A systemic review was made and a meta-analysis from the following databases: MEDLINE, EBSCO HOST AND The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only the controlled and randomized studies were selected. The data of all studies were combined and also the relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI was used with the Mantel-Haenszel method as an effect measure for dichotomy variables. For the analysis of continuing variables the mean difference was used. In all the comparisons performed the results were obtained with the fix effect and randomized forms.
RESULTS. A total of 53 transoperative complications were registered in the MIH hysterectomy versus 17 in the TAH group (RR: 1,78; 95% CI: 1,04-3.05). Postoperative complications evolved in a similar way in both groups without significant differences from the statistical point of view. The blood losses, the hospital stay and the patient's reincorporation to usual and work activities were lesser in the laparoscopy group; however, the operative time is higher when it is compared with TAH (mean difference: 37,36; 95% CI: 34,36-39,93).
CONCLUSIONS. Both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. The indication of MIH must to be individualized according to the clinical situation of each patient and these not to be performed in those centers without a properly trained surgical staff and with experience in advanced minimal invasive surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Bachman GA. Hysterectomy: a critical review. J Reprod Med 1990;35:839-62.

  2. Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1900-1997. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:229-34.

  3. Robertson EA, Blok S. Decrease in the number of abdominal hysterectomies after introduction of laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:523-525.

  4. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213-16.

  5. Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95: 99-205.

  6. García Rodríguez ME, Romero Sánchez RE. Histerectomía vaginal en úteros no prolapsados: a propósito de 300 casos. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol [seriada en Internet]. 2008;34(1) [citado 2009-09-29]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2008000100006&lng=es&nrm=iso

  7. Meikle SF, Weston NE, Orleans M. Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:304-11.

  8. Kadar N. Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy in community hospitals. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists. 1995;2(4, suppl):S21.

  9. Garry R. Comparison of hysterectomy techniques and cost-benefit analysis. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11(1):137-48.

  10. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677.

  11. Meikle SF, Weston NE, Orleans M. Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:304-11.

  12. Cipullo L, Cassese S, Fasolino L, Fasolino A. Laparoscopic hysterectomy and urological lesions: risk analysis based on current literature and preventive strategies. Minerva Ginecol. 2008;60(4):331-7.

  13. Léonard F, Fotso A, Borghese B, Chopin N, Foulot H, Chapron C. Ureteral complications from laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: a 13-year experience in a continuous series of 1300 patients. Hum Reprod 2007;22(7):2006-11.

  14. Angle HS, Cohen SM, Hidlebaugh D. The initial Worcester experience with laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists. 1995;2(2):155-61.

  15. Harkki-Siren P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(1):108-12.

  16. O'Shea RT, Petrucco O. Complications of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists. 1995;2(4, suppl):S38.

  17. Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Tiitinen A. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(1):113-8.

  18. Saavedra J. Estrategias y trucos en la histerectomía laparoscópica compleja. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2003;54:249-257.

  19. Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):2996-9.

  20. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Hawe J, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. Br Med J 2004;328:129-33.

  21. Harkki-Sirén P, Sjoberg J, Toivonen J, Tiitinen A. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:866-71.

  22. Kluivers KB, Hendriks JM,Mol BW,Bongers MY, Bremer GL, De Vet HC et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: A randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(2):145-52.

  23. Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, Kjolhede. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomya randomized controlled multicentre study. BJOG 2006;113:1023-30.

  24. Aniuliene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M. A comparative analysis of hysterectomies. Medicina (Kaunas) 2007;43(2):118-24.

  25. Candiani M, Izzo S, Bulfoni A, Riparini J, Ronzoni S, Marconi A. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):368.e1-7.

  26. Holub Z, Jabor A, Kliment L Jr, Vorácek J, Lukác J. Comparison of two procedures for laparovaginal hysterectomy: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;90(1):31-6.

  27. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2005;330(7506):1478.

  28. Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;81(1):18-23.

  29. Marana R; Busacca M; Zupi E; Garcea N; Paparella P; Catalano GF. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstetrics Gynecology 1999;180(1):270-5.

  30. Oscarsson U, Poromaa IS, Nüssler E, Löfgren M. No difference in length of hospital stays between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy—a preliminary study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85(6):682-7.

  31. Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG 2000;107(11):1380-5.

  32. Raju KS, Auld BJ. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingoophorectomy.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:1068-71.

  33. Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, Pinotti JA. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(1):37-43.

  34. Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(1):3-7.

  35. Fiaccavento A, Landi S, Barbieri F, Zaccoletti R, Tricolore C, Ceccaroni M et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in cases of very large uteri: a retrospective comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(5):559-63.

  36. Yuen PM, Mak TW, Yen SF. Metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):1-5.

  37. Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S, Garry R. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. BMJ 2004;328 :134-7.

  38. Laveran RL, Simon NV, Gerlach DH, Jackson JR. Cost analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists. 1996;103(4):345-350.

  39. Kjerulff KH, Guzinski G, Langenberg P, Pegues R. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists. 1996;3(4):S22.

  40. Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M. Cost Effectiveness and Health Status after Laparoscopic and Abdominal Hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3(4):S37.

  41. Kim HS, Kim JW, Kim MK, Chung HH, Lee TS, Jeon YT, A randomized prospective trial of the postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: clinical trial design. Trials. 2009;29(10):8.

  42. Rowe MK, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. Quality of life among women undergoing hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:91521.

  43. Langebrekke A, Eraker R, Nesheim BI, Urnes A, Busund B, Sponland G. Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal - a prospective randomised study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomy. Acta Obstetrica et Gyanecologica Scandinavica 1996;75:404-7.

  44. Ellstrøm M, Olsen MF, Olsson J-H, Nordberg G, Bengtsson A, Hahlin M. Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1998;77:923-8.

  45. Olsson J-H, Ellstrøm M, Hahlin M. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;103:345-50.

  46. Ellstrøm M, Olsen MF, Olsson J-H, Nordberg G, Bengtsson A, Hahlin M. Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1998;77:923-8.

  47. Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Vianello F, Govoni F, Cantarelli M, Gualerzi B, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 Aug;9(3):333-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com