medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2011; 50 (1)

Results of coronary revascularization in the Cardiac Center of the

Nafeh AM, Hernández NR, Carballo HN, Villar IA, Guevara GL, Chaos GN, Chil DR, Rodríguez RK

Language: Spanish
References: 60
Page: 54-72
PDF size: 374.18 Kb.


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. In Cardiac Center of the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Clinical Surgical Hospital cardiovascular surgery is done from more twenty years ago introducing and developing different techniques of myocardial revascularization. The objective of present research was to describe the results of coronary revascularization over that period.
METHODS. A retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive research with five-year cross-sectional cuts was conducted comparing each five-year period with the following one. From the total of 763 patients underwent coronary revascularization from January,1985 to December, 2004, 17 patients were excluded due to missing medical records or with incomplete data and 15 patients operated on without extracorporeal circulation, thus, the universe included 731 patients operated on with this technique.
RESULTS. There was predominance the patients aged between 51 and 60years and male sex where smoking and high blood pressure were the more frequent risk factors. The predominant clinical stages were the chronic stable angina and the unstable angina as well as revascularization with three bridges and a trend to rise, as well as the saphenous vein use but with an ascending evolution as the only duct. The time of extracorporeal circulation and anoxic arrest showed a trend to decrease. The more frequent complications were the urinary and respiratory sepsis. There was a decrease of deaths from cardiac causes among which the multiorgan failure and the low cardiac output were the major ones. The low transoperative output decreased but there was a trend to increase during the postoperative one and of the multiorgan failure.
CONCLUSIONS. The use of coronary revascularization showed a ascending trend over these 20years mainly in third age patients and of the male sex where the smoking and the high blood pressure were the more associated risk factors. There was predominance of three bridges revascularization and use of saphenous vein but with an increasing use of internal mammary artery. Mortality was a decreasing behavior.


REFERENCES

  1. Morán S. Historia de la Cirugía Cardiaca. Rev Chil Cir. 1997;49:187-92.

  2. Harken DE. Foreign bodies in and in relation to the thoracic blood vessels and heart. Surg Gynec Obstet 1946;83:117-25.

  3. Harken DE, Ellis LB, Norman LR. The surgical treatment of mitral stenosis. N Engl J Med 1948;239:891-909.

  4. Sones FM, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1962;31:735.

  5. Kolessov VI. Mammary arterycoronary artery anastomosis as a method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1967;54:535.

  6. Favalaro RG. Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion. Ann Thorac Surg 1968;5:334.

  7. Johnson WD, Flemma RJ, Lepley D Jr, Ellison EH. Extended treatment of severe coronary artery disease: a total surgical approach. Ann Surg 1969;171:460.

  8. Dallan LA, Oliveira SA, Jatene FB, Corso R, Iglesias JCR, Prates N, et al. Artéria radial na ampliação do uso de enxertos arteriais para revascularização do miocárdio: considerações anatômicas e tática cirúrgica. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1996;11(2):75-81.

  9. Pick AW, OrszulaK TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal Mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:599-605.

  10. Buxton BF, Komeda M, Fuller JA, Gordon I. Bilateral Internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery. Risk-adjusted survival. Circulation 1998;98:1-6.

  11. Lytle BW, Blackstone, Loop FD, Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass R, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:855-72.

  12. Turina, Marko. Increased risk due to relevant comorbities in surgical myocardial revascularization. Arch Surg. 2002;4:47-56.

  13. Cuenca J, Herrera JM, Rodríguez-Delgadillo MA. Revascularización miocárdica arterial completa con ambas arterias mamarias sin circulación extracorpórea Rev Esp Cardiol 2000;53:63241.

  14. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, Mewman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1857-63.

  15. Morán S, Dubernet J, Maturana G. Sobrevida y resultados alejados en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de revascularización miocárdica. Rev Med Chile 1979;107:116-9.

  16. Morán SV, Tarazi RC, Urzúa JU. Effects of aortocoronary bypass on myocardial contractility. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973;65:335-9.

  17. Gaudino M, Glieca F, Alessandrini F, Cellini C, Luciani N, Pragliola C, et al. Individualized surgical strategy for the reduction of stroke risk in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1246-53.

  18. Anderson BE, Edmund LH, Stephenson LW. Management of complications of cardiopulmonary bypass: complications of organs systems: In Waldhausen cardiothoracic surgery. ST, Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991. Pp. 45-9.

  19. Shah PJ, Hare DL, Raman JS, Gordon I, Chan RK, Horowitz JD, Rosalion A, Buxton BF. Survival after myocardial revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy: a prospective ten-year follow-up study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1320-7.

  20. Demers P, Cartier R. Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:908-12.

  21. Kilo J, Baumer H, Czerny M, Hiesmayr MJ, Ploner M, Wolner E, et al. Target vessel revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in elderly high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:537-42.

  22. Buffolo E, Andrade JCS, Branco JNR, et al. Myocardial revascularizationwithout extracorporeal circulation: seven-year experience in 593 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990;4:5049.

  23. Benetti FJ, Naselli G, Wood M. Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation: experience in 700 patients. Chest 1991;100:3126.

  24. Moshkovitz Y, Lusky A, Mohr R. Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass: analysis of short-term and mid-term outcome in 220 patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:97987.

  25. Locker CH, Moshkovitch Y, Gurevitch J. Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with acute myocardial infarction. 13th Meeting of the EACTS. Glasgow, Scotland; Sept. 1999.

  26. Igual A, Saura E. Cirugía cardiovascular en el año 2002. Registro de Intervenciones de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Cardiovascular. Cir Cardiov. 2004;11:97-108.

  27. Palma-Ruiz M, García de Dueñas L, Rodríguez-González A, Sarría-Santamera A. Análisis de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria de la cirugía de revascularización coronaria. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003;56:687-94.

  28. Álvarez M, Colmenero M, Martín P, Prados I, Moreno E, González-Molina M, et al. ¿Se puede identificar mediante el EuroSCORE a los pacientes con mortalidad mínima en cirugía cardíaca? Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003;56:682-6.

  29. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EWL, Suyker WJL, Diephuis J, van Boven WJ, et al. A Comparison of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:394-402.

  30. Morlans Hernández K, Saínz Cabrera H, González-Prendes Alvarez CM, Morlans P. Complicaciones trans y posoperatorias inmediatas en la cirugía de revascularización coronaria. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 1996;10(1).

  31. Rukosujew A, Klotza S, Reitzb C, Gogartenc W, Welpa H, Schelda HH. Patients and complication with `off-pump' vs `on-pump' cardiac 5 surgery a single surgeon experience. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2007;6:768.

  32. Kannel WB, Feinleib M. Natural history of angina pectoris in the Framingham study: prognosis and survival. Am J Cardiol. 1972;29:154-63.

  33. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. Baseline risk factors and their association with outcome in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:756-62.

  34. Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, Keriakes D, Ken MJ, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2215-38.

  35. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA, Gardner TJ, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 Guideline Update for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). [monograph on internet] American College of Cardiology Web Site. Available at: http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/cabg/index.pdf

  36. Alonso Martín JJ, Curcio Ruigómez A, Cristóbal Varela C, Tarín Vicente MN, Serrano Antolín JM, Talavera Calle P, Graupner Abad C. Indicaciones de revascularización: aspectos clínicos. Rev Esp Cardiol 2005;58(2):198216.

  37. Hilker M, Oelert H, Hake U. A review of 507 off-pump coronary bypass patients: a single center experience. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:246-250.

  38. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G, Di Mauro M, Iacò AL, Bivona A, et al. Late results of first myocardial revascularization in multiple vessel disease: single versus bilateral internal mammary artery with or without saphenous vein grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26(3):542-8.

  39. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2006;4(3):395-403.

  40. Buxton B, Tatoulis J. Conduits for coronary surgery. En: Wheatley DJ, editor. Surgery of coronary artery disease. London: Arnold Publishers; 2003. p. 250-69.

  41. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, et al. Influence of the internal mammary artery on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1-6.

  42. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Is return of angina after coronary artery bypass grafting immutable, can it be delayed, and is it important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:440-53.

  43. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns BP. Does arterial revascularization decrease the risk of infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1-11.

  44. Stevens LM, Carrier M, Perrault LP, Hebert Y, Cartier R, Bouchard D, et al. Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on mortality and event-free survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1408-15.

  45. Takeuchi K, Sakamoto S, Nagayoshi Y, Nishizawa H, Matsubara J. Reactivity of human internal thoracic artery to vasodilators in coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:956-9.

  46. Buxton BF, Ruengsakulrach P, Fuller J, Rosalion A, Reid CM, Tatoulis J. The right internal thoracic artery graft ¬ benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18:255-61.

  47. Markwith T, Hennen B, Scheller B, Schäefers HJ, Wendler O.. Flow wire measurements after complete arterial coronary revascularization with T-grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:788-93.

  48. Calfiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, Di Mauro M, Mazzei V, Teodori G, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y-grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:990-6.

  49. Vitolla G, Giammarco G, Teodori G, Mazzei V, Canosa C, Di Mauro M, et al. Composite lengthened arterial conduits: long-term angiographic results of an uncommon surgical strategy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:687-90.

  50. Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D, Verhelst R, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic folow-up of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;14:407-14.

  51. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Canosa C, Di Giammarco GD, ICAO AL, Contini M.. Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: advantages, disadvantages and similarities. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:953-60.

  52. Rizzoli G, Schiavon L, Bellini P. Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:781-6.

  53. Sergeant P, Wouters P, Meyns B, Bert B, Van Hemelrijck J, Bogaerts C, et al. OPCAB versus early mortality and morbidity: an issue between clinical relevance and statistical significance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:779-85.

  54. Bernardo Fernández C, Martínez Núñez JO, Castillo Martínez JM, Machín Rodríguez JC, Mamani Huarachi VH. Caracterización clinicoquirúrgica de los pacientes operados de revascularización coronaria. MEDISAN [seriada en Internet] 2005;9(1). Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/san/vol9_1_05/san08105.htm

  55. Lytle BW. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts and wound complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121(4):625-7.

  56. Deng Y, Byth K, Paterson HS. Semi-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafts and sternal wound complications. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2004;12(3):227-32.

  57. Peterson MD, Borger MA, Rao V, Peniston CM, Feindel CM. Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1314-9.

  58. Herreros J. Cirugía coronaria. Evolución en la última década. Indicaciones y resultados actuales. Rev Esp Cardiol 2005;58(9):110716.

  59. Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Brooks N, Grotte G, Fabri BM, Au J, et al. Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25,730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years. Heart. 2007;93(6):744-8.

  60. Nicolini F, Beghi C, Muscari C, Agostinelli A, Budillon AM, Spaggiari I, et al. Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: current options and future challenges. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:986-93.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com