medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)

2012, Number 01

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2012; 16 (01)

Cervicometry in the evaluation of preterm labor

Nápoles MD

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 81-96
PDF size: 198.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

One of the current problems of greater importance in perinatal medicine is the preterm labor, because besides elevating the perinatal morbidity and mortality, it causes neurological damage and affects growing in the newborns. In this paper not only the value of cervicometry is highlighted as a screening method in population with high risk of preterm newborns, but also its importance to predict the occurrence threat of the last condition when uterine contractions exist, reason why the appropriate technique, approaches, indications and the advantages of this procedure are described, as well as the cut level for the cervical length is determined in its different modalities. As a result, a care protocol for pregnants with prematurity risk based on the use of cervicometry was introduced, which is considered a valuable screening tool in the selected population.


REFERENCES

  1. Prats Coll R, Albaladejo Cortes M, Bardon Fernández R, Checa Jane M. Análisis de la problemática del parto prematuro. Una visión epidemiológica. En: Parto prematuro. Madrid: Médica Panamericana; 2004:1-17.

  2. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Jams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75-84.

  3. Buhimschi IA, Zhao G, Rosemberg VA. Multidimensional proteomics analysis of amniotic fluid yo provide insight into the mechanisms of idiopathic preterm birth. Plos One. 2008;3(4):200-49.

  4. Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS. Proteomics of amniotic fluid in assessment of the placenta. Relevance for preterm birth. Placenta. 2008:s95-s101.

  5. Carreras Moratonas E, Crispi Brillas F. Marcadores ecográficos de prematuridad. La longitud cervical. En: Parto pretérmino. Madrid: Médica Panamericana; 2004:91-9.

  6. López Criado MS, Sontalla Aguilar T, Molina FManzBromn JE, Mnzanares S. Casos clínicos: medición cervical. Técnica y errores. En: Actualización en obstetricia y ginecología. Granada:HUVN; 2009.

  7. Oliva Rodríguez JA. Parto pretérmino. Valor de la ultrasonografia vaginal. En: Ultrasonografía diagnóstica fetal, obstétrica y ginecológica. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010.p. 289-300.

  8. Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S. Cervical funneling sonographic predictive of preterm delivery ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol.1997;10:161.

  9. Brown JE, Thieman GA, Shad DM, Fleisher AC, Bohen FH. Transabdominal and transvaginal endosography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:721-6.

  10. Berghella V, Bega Y, TolosaJ. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46:947.

  11. Manzanares S, Setefilla López M, Redondo P, Garrote A, Molina F, Paz Carrillo M, et al. Amenaza de parto prematuro. Valor de la cervicometria y la fibronectina. Actualización en obstetricia y ginecología. [Internet]. 2009 [citado 5 Sep 2011] Disponible en: http://www.hvn.es/servicios_asistenciales/ginecologia_y_obstetricia/ficheros/07appvalordelacervicometriasmanzanares.pdf

  12. Furink K. Cervicometry: all women need to know- midwifery today. Int Midwife. 2008;85:28-30.

  13. Maria M, Calda P, Haakova L, Zizka Z, Dohonalova A, Ziury J. Significance of ultrasound vaginal cervicometry I predictive preterm delivery. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:72-7.

  14. González A, Donado H, Agudelo DF, Mejias HD, Peñaronda CB. Asociación entre cervicometría y parto prematuro en pacientes con sospecha de trabajo de parto pretérmino inicial. Rev Obstet Ginecol. 2005;56:127-33.

  15. Koucky M, Germanota A, Hajek Z, Parizek A, Kalvosova M, Kopecky P. Prenatal and perinatal management of preterm labours. Prague Med Report. 2009; 110. 269-77.

  16. Palacio M, Sanin Blair J, Sanchez M. The use of a variable cutt- off value of cervical length in women admitted for preterm labor before and after 32 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:421.

  17. Duhig KE, Chadiremani M, Seed PT, Briley AL, Kenijon AP, Shennan AH. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm labour in asynntomatic women with cervical cerclaje. An Iinternat J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;116:799-803.

  18. Sunagawas S, Takagi K, Ono K. Comparison of biochemical markers and cervical length for predicting preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2008;34:19.

  19. Goldenberg RL, Goepfert AR, Ramsey PS. Biochemical markers for the prediction of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gyneacol. 2005;192:S36-46.

  20. Tomeko K, Hiromitso Y, Akihiko W. Hyaluronan(HA) and serum- derivad. hialuronan- associated protein (SHAP) – HA complex as predictive markers of cervical ripening in premature labor. Conn Tissue Res. 2008;49:105-8.

  21. Kyo Hoon P, Joon-Seok H, Woong Sun K, Dong Myung S. Transvaginal ultrasonograhic measurement of cervical length in predicting intra- amniotic of cervical impeding preterm delivery in preterm labor: a comparison with amniotic fluid white blood cell count. J Perinatol Med. 2008;36:479-84.

  22. Duhig KE, Chondiramane M, Seed T, Briley AL, Kenyon AP, Shennar AH. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm labour in asymptomatic women with a cervical cerclage. BJOG. 2009;116:799-803.

  23. Curry AE, Vogel I,Drews C, Schended D, Skogstrand K, Flanders WD, et al. Mid – Pregnancy maternal plasma levels of interluking 2, 6 and 12, tumor necrosis factor – alpha, interferon- gamma and granulocyte macrophage colony –stimulating factor and spontaneous preterm de livery. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2007;86:1103-10.

  24. Jacobsson BO, Altonen R, Rantakokko L, Jalava K, Morken NH, Alonen A. Quantification of ureoplasma urealyticun DNAin the amniotic fluid from patients in PTL an p PROM and its relation to inflammatory cytokine levels. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2009;88:63-70.

  25. 25.Sunagawa S, Takagi K, Ono K, Miyachi K, Kikuchi A. Comparison of biochemical markers and cervical length for predicting preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2008;34:812-9.

  26. 26.Smhan HN, Cariti SN. Prevention of preterm delivery. New Engl J Med. 2007;357: fasciculo 5.

  27. 27.Cunningham EG, Gant NF, Leveno kl, Gilstrap LC, Aut JC. Parto pretérmino. En: William's Obstetricia. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2007.p.592-621.

  28. 28.Carey J, Gibbs R. Preterm labor and post–term delivery. Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. 10 ed. Lippincottt: Williams and Wilkins; 2008.

  29. 29.Pandipati S, Habbins JC. Ultrasound in obstetrics. En: Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. 10 ed. Lippincottt: Williams and Wilkins; 2008.

  30. 30.Franco E de, Atkints K, Heyl P. Preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, and cervical insufficiency. En: Manual of obstetrics. 7 ed. Lippincott: Williams and Wilkins; 2007.

  31. 31.Jams JD, Romero R. Preterm birth. En: Gabbe: obstetrics: Normland problem pregnancys. 5 ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com