González-Velázquez F, Juárez-Mesinas DJ

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 261-266
PDF size: 94.18 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to evaluate the tomographyelectroencephalography agreement in pediatric patients attended with epilepsy diagnosis at service neuropediatric in the Medical Unit of High Specialization “Adolfo Ruiz Cortines”, during the period from January to October of year 2006.
Methods: retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational, observational. One hundred eighty files of pediatric patients were reviewed with clinical diagnosis of epilepsy with electroencephalography of date next to their study of tomography; the agreement was realized with the test of kappa, comparing the results of each diagnosis method, in each patient.
Results: of 69 patients, 10 patients were catalogued as normal by both methods and 23 showed cerebral alterations in the same site of epilepsy focus; the observed agreement was 47.8 % with an index of kappa of 0.095
Conclusion: the agreement between the electroencephalography and the computed tomography is very low, in the findings of cerebral structural injuries related to the location of the epilepsy focus in pediatric patients with epilepsy diagnosis.

REFERENCES

1. Behrman MDR. Nelson. Tratado de pediatría. Décima cuarta edición. México: Interamericana McGraw-Hill; 1989. p. 1814-1820.

2. Feria-Martínez D. Epilepsia: Un enfoque multidisciplinario. México: Trillas; 1986. p. 279-280.

3. Calva J. Temas de medicina interna. Epidemiología clínica. México: Interamericana; 1994. p. 283-315.

4. Palencia R. Neuropediatría. Actitud diagnóstica y terapéutica de la epilepsia en la infancia. Bol Pediatr 2000;40:79-87.

5. Chouriri RN, Fayad MN, Farah A, Mikati MA. Classification of epilepsy syndromes and role of genetic factors. Pediatr Neurol 2001;24:37-43.

6. Nieto B. Problemas diagnósticos en las epilepsias del niño. Rev Neurol 1998;26:298-301.

7. Feria A, Martínez D. Epilepsia: un enfoque multidisciplinario. México: Trillas; 1986. p. 279-280.

8. López G. Bases en electroencefalografía clínica y en potenciales evocados. México: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; 1991. p. 41-63.

9. Velasco M. Epilepsia, principios y práctica. México. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; 1985. p. 227-243.

10. Osborn AG. Neurorradiología diagnóstica. México: Mosby; 1996. p. 40-743.

11. Murthy J, Reddy V. Clinical characteristic, seizure spread patterns and prognosis of seizures associated with a single small cerebral calcific CT lesion. Seizure 1998;7:153-157.

12. Coleen Adams MB, Hwang MD, Gilday MD, et al. Comparison of SPECT, EEG,CT, MRI, and pathology in partial epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 1992; 2:97-103.

13. Tai-Wai R, Oskoui M, Oskoui R, Shevell M. Outcomes in pediatric epilepsy: seeing trou the fog. Pediatr Neurol 2005;33:244-250.

14. Hirvasniemi A. Karumo J. Neuroradiological findings in the northerm epilepsy syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 1994;90:388-393.

15. Mountz J, Zhang B, Liu H, et al. A reference method for correlation of anatomic and clinical application. Semin Nucl Med 1994;24:256-271.

16. Cook M, Kilpatrick C. Imaging in epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol 1994;7:123-130.

17. Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay. American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003;60:367-380.