Cedillo VJJ

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 97-102
PDF size: 177.35 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In today’s restorative treatments, direct composite restorations play an increasingly significant role. Even in direct restorations, it is important to replace the form and function of the hard dental tissue that has been lost. Creating physiologically strong and morphologically correct contact points is as vital as designing the right occlusal surface.
The following article describes an alternate system of sectional matrices and fixing rings, and its applications in a clinical case of a class II direct restoration.

REFERENCES

1. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P and Vanherle G Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? American Journal Dental Materials 2001;17(6):533-541.

2. Klein F, Keller AK, Staehle HJ and Dőrfer CE. Proximal contact formation with different restorative materials and techniques American Journal of Dentistry 2002;15(4):232-235.

3. Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters JF, Bronkhorst EM and Plasschaert AJ. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tight-ness of Class II restorations Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2006;8(5):305-310.

4. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Ritter AV and Pereira PNR. Classes I, II and VI Direct composite and other tooth-colored restorations In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO and Swift EJ (eds) Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry 4th ed. St. Louis, Mosby 2002 pp539-568.

5. El-Badrawy WA, Leung BW, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH and Rubo MH. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2003;69(3):162-167.

6. Dőrfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ and Pioch T. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strengths European Journal of Oral Sciences 2000;108(5):368-377.

7. Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM and Burgersdijk RCW. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro J Operative Dentistry 2006;31(6):688-693.

8. Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters JF, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW and Dőrfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites American Journal of Dentistry 2006;34(4):292-297.

9. Müllejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH and Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded Class II resin composite restorations J Operative Dentistry 2003;28(2):122-126.

10. Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters JF, Bronkhorst EM and Huymans MC. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations American Journal of Dentistry 2009;37(9):712-717.

11. Hancock EB, Mayo CV, Schwab RR & Wirthlin MR. (1980) Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status Journal of Periodontology 1980;51(8):445-449.

12. Triodent (2009) V3 System general information. [Homepage de internet] Retrieved online October 24, 2009. Disponible en: http://www.triodent.com/v3-system/general.html?country_code=us.

13. SD Cho, WD Browning & KS Walton. (2010) Clinical use of a seccional matrix and ring Journal of Operative Dentistry 2010;35(5):587-591.