medigraphic.com
Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado

2008, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2008; 13 (2)

Opportune detection of breast cancer in external consultation (breast clinic) of the Regional Hospital General Ignacio Zaragoza

López ML, Méndez MMA

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 45-49
PDF size: 172.79 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To diagnose opportunely breast cancer.
Material and methods: It was a descriptive, traversal and prospective study in ambulatory patients of the clinic of breast at Hospital Ignacio Zaragoza from April to July 2006. We include patients who had ISSSTE social medical benefices, a BI-RADS III mammography study and increase consistency of one breast or both of them in these women was made cytology of material obtained by aspiration.
Results: It was included 47, in 38 patients were negative for breast cancer (80.9%), 3 patients were positive for breast cancer (6.4%) 4 patients had suspicious of cancer (8.5%) and in two patients the same was insufficient (4.3%).
Conclusions: Only three patients were positive for breast cancer (6.5%), so we should not minimize this result since the diagnosis in earlier stages allows to provide less aggressive treatments and better results.


REFERENCES

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murria T, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer statistics 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:8-29.

  2. Epidemiología del cáncer de mama en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (1989-1990). Rev Inst Nal Cancerol (Mex) 1993;39(2):1825-30.

  3. Angel HG, Martín GG, Manuel GB. Manual de oncología, procedimientos quirúrgicos. 3ª ed. México: McGraw Hill-Interamericana, 2004.

  4. López O, Lazcano E, Tovar H, Hernández M. La epidemia del cáncer de mama en México: ¿consecuencia de la transición demográfica? Salud Publica Mex 1997;39:259-65.

  5. Jatoi I. Breast cancer screening. AM J Surg 1999;177(6):518-24.

  6. Torres TR. Tumores de mama. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. 2ª ed. México: McGraw Hill-Interamericana, 1999.

  7. Cabero RL. Tratado de ginecología, obstetricia y medicina de la reproducción. Buenos Aires: Panamericana, 2003.

  8. Mazhar D, Pasman J. Dietary fat and breast cancer. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006;464-7.

  9. Berek JS, Hacker NF. Ginecología oncológica práctica. 4ª ed. México: McGraw Hill-Interamericana, 2006.

  10. Eberl MM, Fox ChH, Edge SB, Carter CA, Mahoney MC. BI-RADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:161-4.

  11. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkis S. Mamographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer. J Br Menopause Soc 2006;12(4):186-93.

  12. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;18;356(3):227-36.

  13. Wiratkapun Ch, Wibulpolpraser B, Lertsithichai P. Breast cancer in patients initially assigned as BI-RADS category 3. Chot Mai Het Thang Phaet 2006;89(6):834-9.

  14. Masroor I. Prediction of benignity or malignancy of a lesion using BI-RADS. J Coll Physicians Sur Pak 2005;15(11):686-8.

  15. Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung B, Grady D. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:274-84.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com