Da Silva-De Abreu AJ, Pascual-González Y, Angulo-Bazán Y

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 86-92
PDF size: 180.59 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Recently, lots have been the advances of science, which have been promoted by the growing habit of publication; even since undergraduate level. Nonetheless, as well as this activity is stimulated due to its value in the Curriculum vitae of who practices it ethically, also can become a temptation difficult to resist for those with higher professional slackness, who in occasions, when incurring in ethical faults, obstruct scientific progress. For that, Acta Científica Estudiantil has done a compilation of the main cathegories of ethical irregularities and; considering worldwide consensus, declares its editorial policies against them. In the same way, Medical Student´s Scientific Society of the Central University of Venezuela (SOCIEM-UCV) and Dentistry Student´s Scientific Society of the Central University of Venezuela (SOCIEO-UCV) declare their administrative policies about the subject.

REFERENCES

1. Smith R. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. BMJ 2005;331(7511):288-91.

2. Valenzuela G. Irregularidades en la publicación de trabajos científicos. An Fac med 2008;69(1):56-8.

3. Angulo-Bazán Y. El proceso de revisión por pares (“Peer Review”) y su importancia en publicaciones científicas estudiantiles. CIMEL. 2009;14(2):78-9.

4. Roberts J. An Author‟s Guide to Publication Ethics: A Review of Emerging Standards in Biomedical Journals. Headache 2009;49:578-89.

5. Hall P, Wixon J, Poulsom R. The Journal of Pathology‟s approach to publication ethics and misconduct. J Pathol 2011;223:447–9.

6. Cabrera-Samith I, Orosteguí-Pinilla D, Angulo-Bazán Y, Mayta-Tristán P, Rodríguez-Morales A. Scientific journals of medical students in Latin-America. Rev méd Chile 2010; 138(11):1451-5.

7. Committee of Publication Ethics. What to do if you suspect plagiarism. [documento en Internet]. London: COPE; 2008. [citado: 20 Feb 2011]. Disponible en: http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/02B_Plagiarism_submitted.pdf.

8. Salinas PJ. Fraude científico en el ambiente universitario. MedULA 2004;13:42-7.

9. Peh W C G, Ng K H. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct. Singapore Med J 2010; 51(12):908.

10. Anderson MS, Steneck NH. The problem of plagiarism. Urol Oncol 2011;29(1):90-4.

11. Huamani C, Dulanto-Pizzorni A, Rojas-Revoredo V. „Copiar y pegar‟ en investigaciones en el pregrado: Haciendo mal uso del Internet. An Fac med 2008; 69 (2): 117-9.

12. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication [documento en Internet]. [citado: 20 Feb 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org/urm_main.html.

13. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics [serie en Internet]. 2010 Dic [citado: 21 Feb 2011]. Disponible en: http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2010/12/23/jme.2010.040923.full.pdf.

14. Reyes H, Palma J, Andresen M. La importancia de declarar un conflicto de intereses en las revistas médicas. Rev méd Chile 2003;131(1):7-9.

15. Mayta-Tristán P, Mezones-Holguín E. Aclaración editorial. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2009;26(3):411-2.

16. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37(2):113-7.

17. Angulo-Bazán Y. Problemas éticos en investigación científica estudiantil. Política editorial de la revista CIMEL. CIMEL 2009;14(1):4-5.