Barreto CJ, Mombelli MA, Neves DM, Pagliarini WMA, Marcon SS

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 129-138
PDF size: 127.29 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Hospital institutions, with their private work organization, are made of very peculiar environments characterized by tension, pain and suffering. This way the hospital sets rules, specific routines and determines the actions of the health team about the care service provided for the patients. In this context, it is possible to identify aspects in the professional actions that can set in stress symptoms, mainly due to the contact with emotionally intense situations, such as life, illness and death.
Stress has been related to sensations of tension, anxiety, fear and discomfort, and there has been an increase in the number of people who define themselves as stressed. Therefore, stress is made up of psycho-physiological alterations that occur when an individual is forced to face situations beyond his/her coping abilities.
Personal characteristics and the environment where the person is inserted are important factors in the occurrence and severity of the reactions to the stress process. Its development depends not only on the personality of the individual but also on his/her health state (mental and organic equilibrium) and because of it not everybody shows the same type of reaction to stressful events. Life style, past experiences, attitudes, beliefs, values, illness and genetic predisposition are important factors in the stress process development.
From this relation (individual-environment) the individual uses coping resources to modify his/her relation with the environment, controlling or altering the stress-causing event. The coping, which is a response to the stress, corresponds to the cognitive and behavioral efforts oriented to deal with the internal or external demands, which are exceeding or overwhelming the individual resources. This way, the aim of the coping strategies is the reduction, elimination or stress handling according to the evaluation that the individual does of a certain event of his/her life.
From the presupposition that the hospital and the provided care to the patient can be developers of stress symptoms, it is believed that studies which provide the evaluation of this event as well as the identification of stressing causes will be able to contribute to minimize and prevent the appearance of stress symptoms in health professionals working in the hospital environment.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to indentify the presence of stress symptoms in health-care professionals working in the hospital environment and know the main stressing causes at the working environment and the coping resources used by the professionals to deal with stressful situations.
Material and methods: It is a descriptive transversal study done with professionals who work at the University Hospital of the West of Parana (HUOP) and that provide direct assistance to the in-hospital patients. This hospital, which has 173 rooms, is a reference in high complexity in urgency and emergency assistance for the West and Southwest of Parana region and it provides assistance in various clinical specialties.
The data was collected from October to December of 2007 together with professionals at the three working shifts. During the collection of the data period, the HUOP had 272 professionals who suited to the criteria to be included in this study, which was to provide direct assistance to the patient.
In the definition of the sample size, it was adopted a 5% pattern error and prevalence of stress symptoms of 20%. Besides this, it was predicted a margin of 20% to the size of the sample to cover likely loss of subjects and/or information. Therefore, the calculated size sample was of 155 professionals. To define the professionals who would be included in this study, a stratification proportional to the total number of workers from each professional category was carried out. Moreover, when the number of workers of a certain category was very small (two or three at most), it was decided to include all of them.
The research subjects were selected at random, and the two first workers to arrive in the sector at their working shift were invited to participate in this study. Sixteen professional, all technicians and auxiliary nurses, missed to fill the biggest part of the test as well the prepared questions and because of it they were excluded of the study, something which made the effective sample be made up of 139 professionals: 93 technicians and/or auxiliary nurses, 32 nurses, 6 doctors, 2 nutritionists, 2 physiotherapists, 1 sychologist, 1 phonoaudiologist, and 2 social assistance workers.
The data was collected through a self-applicable questionnaire, to be filled individually and handed back the same day. The participants took an average of 20 minutes to answer the questionnaires. Two instruments were used; the first one was constituted of two parts, one approaching social-demographic and work related matters and the second with two discursive questions about stressful events in the working environment and the coping strategies used for dealing with them. The second instrument is the Inventory of Stress Symptoms for Adults -ISSL-, which allows us to identify, from the symptomatology shown by the subject, the presence or not of stress; the present type (somatic or psychological) and in which phase of stress the individual is.
The data was kept in an Excel data bank, and we used the computer package Statistic 7.2 for the analysis of the variable, and for the calculus of the Fischer Exact Test we used the program SAS 9.1 (Statistical Analysis System). A significance level of 5% was established.
For the analysis of the qualitative data, the answers to the discursive questions were grouped in four categories: intrinsic factors/situations to work; working conditions; interpersonal relations and factors related to assistance.
Results: One hundred and thirty nine health professionals who provide direct assistance to the patient in hospital environment participated in this study, such as doctors, nurses, nurses technicians, physiotherapists, psychologist, phonoaudiologist, social assistants and nutritionist.
The applied Inventory of Stress Symptoms revealed that from the 139 evaluated subjects 60.4% presented stress. From those, 5.7% were in the alert phase; 44.6% in the resistance phase; 7.2% at the close-to-exhaustion phase; and 2.9% in the exhaustion phase. From those who presented stress symptoms, there was a higher incidence of physical symptoms (36.7%), being followed by the physical/psychological (16.5%) and psychological (7.2%) ones.
It was observed a significant association between the presence of stress and the working sector (p=0.0002) and the working period of time at the same institution (p=0.0133).
In relation to the stressful events, it was observed that the working conditions were pointed with more frequency as stress generators (31.1%), followed by intrinsic working factors (26.6%), interpersonal relations (26.3%) and assistance related factors (16%).
Many forms of coping were identified, and a great majority of the professionals (43.0%) uses as a strategy to deal with stress, alternatives out of the working environment, which means that they deal with the emotional response developed by the stressor event; a considerable part of the professionals (30.7%) uses as a strategy to relieve stress the focus in solving the problem – something that tries to modify the relation of the individual with the environment, promoting changes directly in the situation that causes stress; and, 26.3% did not show coping responses.
Conclusions: It was pointed an indicative of stress in professionals of various areas, with the prevalence of physical symptoms, in the resistance phase. The events considered as stressors by the professionals, in fact, led to the appearance of stress symptoms, being related to the working environment. Being aware of the stressors and understanding how the caretaker deal with these events support the more effective actions in order to reduce stress and improve the working conditions to these professionals. As it is extremely important that those professionals be in physical and psychological conditions which are favorable so that they can provide a better assistance as well as a proper one to the needs of the patient.

REFERENCES

1. Dejours C. A loucura do trabajo: estudo de psicopatologia do trabajo. 5.ed. São Paulo: Cortez-Oboré; 1992.

2. Rosa C, Carlotto MS. Síndrome de Burnout e satisfação no trabajo em profissionais de uma instituição hospitalar. Rev SBPH 2005; 8,1-15.

3. Pitta A. Hospital: dor e morte como oficio. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2003.

4. Benevides-Pereira AMT. Burnout: O processo de adoecer pelo trabajo. In Benevides-Pereira (Org.), Burnout: Quando o trabajo ameaça o bem estar do trabalhador. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 2002.

5. Lipp MEN. Inventário de sintomas de estrés para adultos. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 2000.

6. Lipp MEN, Malagris LEN. O estrés no Brasil de hoje. In: Lipp MEN. O estrés no Brasil: pesquisas avançadas. Campinas: Papirus; 2004; pp.215-22.

7. Lipp MEN, Malagris LEN. O estrés emocional e seu tratamento. In Range B. Psicoterapias cognitivo-comportamentais: um diálogo com a psiquiatria. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2001.

8. Santos CMC, Rocha LSAD. O estrés e o professor em uma escola de formação de professores na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Monografía. Brasil: Departamento de Psicologia Clínica, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2003.

9. Lipp MEN, Tanganelli MS. Estrés e qualidade de vida em magistrados da justiça do trabajo: Diferenças entre homens e mulheres. Psicol Reflex Crit 2002;15(3):537-548

10. França ACL, Rodrigues AL. Estrés e trabajo: Uma abordagem psicossomática. São Paulo: Editora Atlas; 1999.

11. Morais PC. Incidência de estrés em profissionais da área da saúde. [on line]. [acessado 02 dez 2007]. 1º Congresso norte-nordeste de psicologia. Vª Semana Baiana de Psicologia, Salvador. Anais. Salvador: Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1999. Disponível em URL: http://www.ufba.br/ncompsi/compsi1999/p086.html.

12. Gómez NM, Dodino CN, Aponte CF, Caycedo CE et al. Relación entre perfil psicológico, calidad de vida y estrés asistencial en personal de enfermaría. Universitas Psychologica 2005;4(1):63-75.

13. Calais SL, Andrade LMB, Lipp MEN. Diferenças de sexo e escolaridade na manifestação de estrés em adultos jovens. Psicol Reflex Crit 2003;16(2):257-263.

14. Sparrenberger F, Santos I, Lima RC. Epidemiologia do diestrés psicológico: Estudo transversal de base populacional. Rev Saúde Pública 2003;37(4):434-439.

15. Malagris NL, Fiorito CCA. Avaliação do nível de estrés de técnicos da área de saúde. Psicol Reflex Crit 2006;23(4)391-98.

16. Mudgal J, Borges GLG, Diaz-Montiel JC, Flores Y et al. Depression among health workers: the role of social characteristics, work stress, and chronic diseases. Salud Mental 2006;29(5):1-8.

17. Weiner EL, Swain GR, Wolf B, Gottlieb M. A qualitative study of physicians’ own wellness-promotion practices. West J Med 2001;174(1):19-23.

18. Camelo SHH, Angerami ELS. Sintomas de estresse nos trabalhadores atuantes em cinco núcleos de saúde da família. Rev Latino Am Enfermagem 2004;12(1):14-21.

19. Dejours C, Abdoucheli E, Jayet C. Psicodinâmica do trabajo: contribuição da Escola Dejouriana à análise das relações prazer, sofrimento e trabajo. São Paulo: Atlas; 1994.

20. Savoia MG. Instrumentos para avaliação de eventos vitais e de estratégias de enfrentamento em situações de estresse. In Gorenstein LHS, Andrade AWZ. (eds). Escalas de avaliação clínica em Psiquiatria e Psicofarmacologia. São Paulo: Lemos-Editorial; 2000; pp. 377-387.

21. Santos AF, Alves Júnior A. Estresse e estratégias de enfrentamento em mestrandos de ciências da saúde. Psicol Reflex Crit 2007;20(1):104-113.