2010, Number 5
<< Back Next >>
Rev ADM 2010; 67 (5)
Flexible titanium post
Cedillo VJJ, Ávila PCC
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 241-248
PDF size: 799.40 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, cast posts are often being replaced by the prefabricated variety. Recent studies have shown these to be more versatile and easier to use, and to produce better results. Added to this are the major advances in dentinal bonding and cements, as well as those in resin-based core materials. Within the range of prefabricated posts, there is a wide variety of materials available. The most well-known and commonly used posts are the fiber, carbon fiber, zirconium, stainless steel and titanium versions.
The most successful prefabricated posts are the titanium-made version, this due primarily to the biocompatibility of the material, as well as a number of other advantages that will be described later. The purpose of this study is to describe the most important characteristics of a prefabricated flexible titanium post system.
REFERENCES
Sorensen J.A. Preservation of Tooth Structure. California Dental Association 1988, 16:15-21.
Boyle PE. Kronfeld’s histopatology of the teeth Ed. 4, 1955 Philadelphia. Lea & febiger. Pp.65.
Sedgley C, Messer H. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle. JOE. 1992;332-335.
Myers G. Prótesis de coronas y puentes. 1971 Barcelona, Labor, pp.24-25.
Stockton L. Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999 ; 81(4):380-385.
Sorensen J. A. “Clinically significant factors in dowel design”. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry 1984;52.
Martínez GA, Solá RF. Indicaciones y ventajas del muñón ceramizado. A propósito de un caso. Quintessence 1997; 10(4): 220-225.
Sorensen J.A., Engelman M.J. Ferrule “Design and fractrure resistance of endodontically treated teeth”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1990;63(5):529-536.
Christensen G.J., Posts: necessary or unnecessary? Journal American Dental Association 1996; 127: 1522-1526.
Huete VR. Análisis clínico comparativo de cinco sistemas de postes para odontología restaurativa: estudio piloto. Rev. Cient. Odontol. Oct. 2009 (5) 1:69-76.
Akkayan, B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry, 2002;87: 431-437.
Standlee, J.P. y Caputo, A.A. Effect of surface design on retention of dowels cemented with a resin. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry,1993;70; 403-405.
Kogan FE, Zyman G F. Estudio comparativo de la adaptación de 3 sistemas prefabricados de postes endodónticos a la preparación del conducto. Revista ADM 2004;61(3):102-108.
Baldissara P. Mechanical Properties and in vitro evaluation. In: Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber Post. Characteristics and Clinical Applications. Masson SPA. Milano 2002.
Oruc S, Tulunoglu Y. Fit of titanium and a base metal alloy metal-ceramic crown. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;83(3): 314-318.
Wataha J, Lockwood PE, Khajotia SS and Turner R. Effect of PH on release from dental casting alloys. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998;80(6): 691-698.
Jang K, Youn S, Kim Y. Comparison of castibility and surface roughness of Commercially pure titanium and cobaltchromium denture frameworks. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry. 2001;86(1):93-98.
Enciclopedia de Ciencia y Técnica. Tomo 13. Titanio, Salvat Editores S.A.1984.
Akagi K, Okamoto et al. Properties of test metal ceramic titanium alloys. Journal Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992; 68 (3): 462-467.
Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Journal American Dental Association. 1984:109(5): 766.
Guiza Cristancho E.H, Correales Fonseca M.A, Moreno Rodríguez I.D, Estudio del módulo de elasticidad para diferentes sistemas de postes por medio de fuerzas torsionales. Revista de la Federación Odontológica Colombiana 2008;71( 221):10-18.
Cervantes ME, Ortiz S ME. Percolación en postes vaciados y postes prefabricados con núcleo de amalgama y núcleo de resina fotopolimerizable. Revista ADM 1997;64(4):233-238.
Cedillo VJJ. Factor C en operatoria dental. Revista ADM 2010;67(2),83-87.
Full text