2002, Number 6
<< Back
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2002; 40 (6)
Patient Rights in Mexico
Tena TC, Ruelas BE, Sánchez GJM, Rivera CAE, Moctezuma BG, Manuell LGR, Ramírez RA, Casares QS, Hernández GLE, Migoya VA
Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 523-529
PDF size: 122.88 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Mexico’s 2001-2006 National Development Plan and the National Health Program emphasize the importance of making explicit patient rights, to promote a service culture that will satisfy patient expectations and dignity. This paper publishes the Mexican experience on the Patient General Rights formulation. Mexican society opinion leaders, experts representing national health and education institutions and non-governmental Mexican organisms were called together to analyze and systematize patient rights. The document originated from 1117 opinions, that were cross-referenced against current legislation. The final document was delivered to society in the presence of the President of the Republic on December 2001. The proposed rights include adequate medical care, dignified and respectful treatment, sufficient, clear, timely, and truthful information, free decision-making concerning patients, granting or not of informed consent, confidential treatment, second-opinion facilities, emergency medical treatment, and clinical file. According to world trends, documentation of patient rights face-to-face with their physician will impact on health service quality in Mexico by revealing the physician patient relationship to the patient.
REFERENCES
1. Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos. En: Rodríguez RJ, compilador. Instrumentos interna-cionales sobre derechos humanos ONU-OEA. Tomo 1. México: Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos; 1988. p. 5-16, 19-29, 30-41, 162-166.
2. Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Lisboa de la Asociación Médica Mundial. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 1990;108(2):5-6.
3. López-de-la-Peña XA. Actitud médica y conoci-mientos legales de algunos derechos del paciente. Rev Invest Clin 1995;47(1):5-12.
4. Secretaría de Salud. Cruzada Nacional por la Calidad de los Servicios de Salud. En: Programa Nacional de Salud, 2001-2006. México: SSa.
5. Comisión Nacional de Bioética. Código-guía bioética de conducta profesional (médicos, enfer-meras y otros trabajadores de la salud). México: Comisión Nacional de Bioética; 2001. p. 3-21.
6. Lifshitz A, Trujillo D. Los derechos humanos del paciente hospitalizado. México: Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos; 1992. p. 9-10.
7. Rivero-Serrano O, Tanimoto M. El ejercicio actual de la medicina. México: Siglo XXI; 2000.
8. Sepúlveda B. Los derechos del paciente. Gac Med Mex 1987;120(5):269.
9. Velasco-Suárez M. Conclusiones: sanción inmediata del cirujano. Gac Med Mex 1989;125:14.
Ramírez M, Espinoza PA, Viniegra L. El respeto a los intereses de los pacientes pediátricos. Rev Invest Clin 1996;48:361-367.
López-de-la-Peña XA. Los derechos del paciente. México: Trillas; 2000.
Álvarez A. Una aproximación psicoanalítica a la ética de la relación médico-paciente. Rev Invest Clin 1997;49:491-496.
Wayne W, Smith RC, Stewart M. Tell me about yourself: The patient-centered interview. Ann Int Med 2001;134(11):1079-1085.
Schroeter KM. Ethics in perioperative practice-patient advocacy. AORN Journal 2002;75(5):941-944.
Heubi J. Protecting the innocent. J Pediatr Gastro-enterol Nutr 2002;4:334-336.
Bamgbade O. Anaesthetic drug information leaflets-for the patient or for the doctor? Anaesthesia 1998; 56(12):1213-1214.
Schneller ES. Professions and the 21st Century: A commentary on the physician as worker. Health Care Manage Rev 2001;26:71-77.
Nordgren S, Fridlund B. Patients’ perceptions of self-determination as expressed in the context of care. J Adv Nurs 1999;35(1):117-125.
Byerly RT, Carpenter JE, Davis J. Managed care and the evolution of patient rights. JONA’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 2001;3(2):58-67.
Secretaría de Salud. Ley General de Salud. Ar-tículos 51, 54, 100 y 103. México: SSa; 2000.
Secretaría de Salud. Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en Materia de Prestación de Servicios de Atención Médica. Artículos 21, 30, 71,80. México: SSa; 2000
Secretaría de Salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-168-SSA1-1998, del expediente clínico. Diario Oficial de la Federación septiembre 30, 1999.
Coulter A. After Bristol: Putting patients at the centre. BMJ 2002;324:648-651.
ABIM, ACP-ASIM Foundation, European Federa-tion of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A Physician Charter. ANN Int Med 2002;136:243-246.
Land NP. Professional liability, patient safety, and first do no harm. Am J Surg 2001;182:537-541.
Lifshitz A. La práctica de la medicina clínica en la era tecnológica. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2000. p. 129-150.
Madrazo-Navarro M, Cervantes-Pérez A, Flores-Casanova Y. Desarrollo científico y tecnológico y atención a la salud. México: Conferencia Interame-ricana de Seguridad Social; 2000. p. 87-113.
Astrow AB, Puchalski CM, Sulmasy DP. Religion, spirituality, and health care: Social, ethical, and practical considerations. Am J Med 2001:110(4): 283-287.
Minetti JA. Ética médica. Introducción histórica. Quirón: 1998. p. 114-129.
Dooley D. Medical ethics and the future of health care. J Med Ethics 2001;27(3):213.
Wilson CN. Patients’ rights: Federal versus State Governments. Hospital Pharmacy 2001;36(6):598, 601-608.
Chesney R. Privacy and its regulation: Too much too soon, or too little too late. Pediatrics 2001;107 (6): 1423-1425.
Wharry S. Bush marches to own beat as patient-rights initiative takes off in US. CMAJ 2001;164(11):1611.
Van-Der-Zeijden A. The patient rights movement in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;18(Suppl) 1:7-13.
Horton R. Health and the UK Human Rights Act 1998. Lancet 2000;356(9236):1186-1188.
Luce J. New standards for patient rights and medical competence. Crit Care Med 2000;28(8):3114-3115.