medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5294 (Print)
Confederación Nacional de Pediatría de México, A. C. (CONAPEME)

2007, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Pediatr Mex 2007; 10 (2)

Prevalencia de macrosomía fetal en Cárdenas, Tabasco

Posada-Arévalo SE, Zavala-González MA

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 5-10
PDF size: 254.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The macrosomic state predisposes the newborn to perinatal morbimortality, it is defined with the weight variable. Preterm newborns don't reach that weight (4000 gr) even if they are macrosomic, excluding them from this risk group.
Objetive. To identify the prevalence of fetal macrosomia using weight and weeks of gestation as variables, associated with the form of delivery
Material and Methods: Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, analytical design; 2100 newborns at Hospital General de Zona # 2 IMSS, Tabasco were included. Period from January 1st to December 31st 2004. Variables: gestational age, gender, weight and delivery way. Percentilar distribution and association measures were obtained
Results: The prevalence of macrosomia with the weight variable isolated was 5 x 100, stratifying by weeks of gestation and percentilar distribution the prevalence was 13.8 x 100 for females and 20.0 for males (x › P90). The greatest association macrosomia/cesarean section was found at 39 and 40 weeks, OR 2.16 (IC95 1.26, 3.72) y 1.85 (IC95 1.19, 2.88) respectively.
Conclusions: The prevalence of macrosomia in our study is similar to that of other populations. Using the percentilar distribution the prevalence is greater than using the weight variable alone, because newborns less than 37 weeks of gestation do not reach 4000 gr, even if they have macrosomic profile and probably they have the same perinatal risk factors. Newborns with a weight less than 4000 gr but over P90 of their gestational age must be a reason for study.


REFERENCES

  1. Hakam Yaseen, MD, CES, DUN; Suleiman Al Najashi, MD; Maha Darwich, MD, CES; Khaled Kamaleddin Mohd, MD; Khalid Al Umran, MD; Bassam Awary, MD; Abdulatif Al Faraidy, Fachartz. Niños macrosómicos hijos de mujeres diabéticas: una comparación entre dos definiciones. International Pediatrics (2006); 16(2) 41.

  2. Langer O. Fetal Macrosomia: Etiological Factors. In Abnormal Fetal Growth, pp. 99-110. Edited by M.Y. Divon. Elsevier Science Publishing Co, Inc. New York, Amsterdam, London 1991.

  3. Aker DB, Sachs BID, Friedman EA. Risk Factors for Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 66: 158.

  4. Lepercq J, Lahlou N, Timsit J, Girard J, Mouson SH. Macrosomia revisted: ponderal index an leptin delinate subtypes of fetal overgrowth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181(3):621-5

  5. Lepercg J, Timsit J, Hanguel-de Monzón S. Etiopathog of fetal macrosomia. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2000; 29 (Suppl 1):6-12.

  6. Jensen H, Agger AD, Rosmussen KL. The influence of prepregnancy body mass index on complicated labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78(9):799-802.

  7. Dang K, Homko C, Reece EA. Factors associated with fetal macrosomia in offspring of gestacional diabetic woman. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9(2):114-7.

  8. Zamorski MA, Biggs WS. Management of suspected fetal macrosomia. Am Fam Phis 2001; 63(2):302-6.

  9. Hytten F and Leitch I. Birth weight. In the Physiology of Human Pregnancy pp. 240259. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford London 1964.

  10. Pacora-Portella Percy. Macrosomía fetal: definición, predicción, riesgos y prevención. Ginecología y obstetricia (1994); 39(17).

  11. Cutié-Bressler Marta Lucía, y cols. Macrosomía fetal, su comportamiento en el último quinquenio. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 2002;28(1):34-41.

  12. Forsbach-Sánchez Gerardo, González-Obele Erica, Villanueva-Cuellar A., Támez-Pérez HE, Rocha-Márquez. Impacto del nuevo criterio para el diagnostico de diabetes gestacional en la estimación de su prevalencia. Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición (2002); 5.

  13. Cortes Y., y cols. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Medellin’s population from 1999 to 2000: the positive predictive value of the screening test and comparison of criteria in the NDDG and ADA. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol, Jan./Mar. 2002, vol.53, no.1, p.81-85.

  14. Modanlou HD, Dorchester WIL, Thorosina A, Frreeman RK: Macrosomia maternal, fetal and neonatal implications. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 420-424

  15. Norma Oficial mexicana NOM-007-SSA2-1993, Atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio y del recién nacido. Criterios y procedimientos para la prestación del servicio.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com