Espíndola-Hernández JG

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 22-32
PDF size: 171.27 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Gyneco-obstetric hospitalized patients usually present emotional reactions to hospitalization, especially affective type that can or not be part of a mental disorder. Some of these manifestations respond to the event in a similar way as a crisis state, not necessarily considered as pathological manifestations, to which, we have denominated psychological discomfort.
In this work we suggest diagnostic indications, objectives and therapeutic strategies based on evidence for specific treatment of these manifestations in an Institutional context which primary purpose is not the treatment in mental health. The behavioural therapy and treatments with inter-subjectivist orientation obtain the best levels of evidence and recommendation for the problem mentioned in the hospital context.

REFERENCES

1. Morales-Carmona F, Luque-Coqui M, Barroso-Aguirre J. Alteraciones emocionales en una muestra de mujeres mexicanas con eventos ginecoobstétricos. Perinatol Reproduc Hum 2002; 16: 157-62.

2. Espíndola H, Morales CF, Díaz FE, Meza RP, Sánchez RC, Carreño MJ y cols. Estudio descriptivo de un grupo psicoterapéutico de pacientes obstétricas con diagnóstico de trastorno mental. Perinatol Reprod Hum 2006; 20: 91-7.

3. Diagnostical and Statistical Manual: Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association Committee of Nomenclature and Statistics. Barcelona, España: Masson; 1996.

4. Espíndola HJ, Morales CF, Díaz FE, Pimentel ND, Henales AC, Varela EA, Ibarra MA. Estudio descriptivo de la población psiquiatrita del Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2006; 74: 476-82.

5. Urrego MS. Evaluación de un programa de intervención en crisis para pacientes psiquiátricos. Hospital del Sur ESE. Bogotá, Colombia; 1999-2000.

6. Kennedy JL. La situación actual de la indagación psicológica. BMJ 2000 28; 321(7268): 1032-3.

7. Raffo L. Intervención en crisis. Apuntes para uso exclusivo de docencia. Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental. Universidad de Chile: 2005.

8. Comprensión psicodinámica y propuesta de intervención psicoterapéutica para el paciente hospitalizado en instituciones no psiquiátricas. Espíndola Hernández José Gabriel. Tesis de Maestría. 2005. Centro ELEIA. No. 2004076.

9. Espíndola HJ, Meza RP, Díaz FE, Rodríguez PL, Mota GC. Aproximación de la intervención psicológica en pacientes hospitalizados de instituciones no psiquiátricas. Rev Perinatol 2003; 18: 9-14.

10. Morales F, Díaz E, Espíndola J, Henales C, Meza P y cols. Concepto de salud psicológica. Temas selectos en orientación psicológica, creando alternativas. Vol 1. Universidad Iberoamericana: Manual Moderno; 2005: 48-61.

11. Bernardi R, Defey D, Garbarino A, Tutté J, Villalba L. Gu{ia Clinica para la psicoterapia. Rev Psiquiatr Urug 2004; 68: 99-146.

12. Beutler LE, Clarkin JF. Systematic treatment selection: toward targeted therapeutic interventions. New Cork: Brunner/Mazel Publishers; 1990.

13. Jacobson W, Cooper AM. Psychodynamic diagnosis in the era of the current DSMs. In: Miller Ne, Luborsky L, BarberJP, editors. Psychodinamic treatment research. A handbook for clinical practice. New York: Basic books; 1993. p. 109-26.

14. Clarkin JF, Levy KN. The influence of client variables on psychotherapy. In: Lambert MJ (ed.). Bergin and Garfield Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaivor Change; 2004, p. 194-226.

15. Morales F, Díaz E, Espíndola J, Henales C, Meza P, Pimentel D. Psicopatología y atención psicológica institucional. Temas selectos en orientación psicológica. Ámbitos profesionales. Vol. 2. Universidad Iberoamericana-University of Scranton NY: Manual Moderno; 2006, p. 57-67.

16. Roth A, Fonagy P, Parry G, Target M, Woods R. What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. 2nd Ed. New York: The Guiford Press; 2004.

17. Treatment choice in psychological therapies and counselling. Evidence based clinical practice guideline. Brief version. Departmen of Health, United Kingdom, 2001; 1-6. London: Department of Health; 4-10-0004

18. Sperry I, Brill PL, Howard KI, Grissom GR, Treatment outcomes in psychotherapy and psichiatric interventions. New Cork: Brunner/Mazel; 1996.

19. Kordy H, Kächele H. Outcome research- A never ending history. In: Adler Rh, Herrman JM, Köhle K, Schonecke OW, Uexküll Tv, Wesiack W (eds.). Psychosomatic Medicine; 1997, p. 290-301.

20. Lancelle G, Bernardi R, Epstein R. The latin American Effectiveness Study: effectivity and efficiency of psychoanalytic treatments of long duration and high frequency. The International Psychoanalytical Association; 1999.

21. Fonagy P, Kächele A, Krauser R, Jones E, Perron K. An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis. Londres: International Psychoanalytical Association; 1999.

22. Galatzer-Levy RM, Bacharch H, Skolnikoff A, Waldron S. Does psychoanalysis work. New Haven, London: Yale University Press; 2000.

23. Figueroa G. Psicoterapia y farmacoterapia en el tratamiento de la depresión mayor. Rev Chil Neuro-Psiquiat 2002; 40: 75-95.

24. Magder DM, Segal ZV, Kennedy SH, Gilbert B. Guidelines for combining pharmacotherapy. In: Cameron P, Enis J, Deadman J, editors. Standards and guidelines for the psychotherapies. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press; 1998: 292-319.

25. Bernardi R. What kina of evidence makes the analyst change his or the theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J (eds.). Pluralism and Unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychonalytical Association, 2003: 125-36.

26. Manual Diagnóstico. Departamento de Psicología. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología: 2005.

27. Lambert MJ (ed.). Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of psychotheapy and behavior change. 5th Ed. New York: John Wiley; 2004.