medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-3254 (Print)
Revista Oficial de la Universidad Biomédica Rafael Guízar y Valencia A. C.

2007, Number 1-2

<< Back Next >>

Plasticidad y Restauración Neurológica 2007; 6 (1-2)

Continuos medical education. Part 2. Education for the health, professionalism, tryning, service

Aguilar RF

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 15-21
PDF size: 117.30 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Continuous Medical Education is the medium to kept at physician in the current exercise of the medicine claims with insistence to maintain, to develop and to increase the knowledge that credited in its moment, on one hand, we have the inexhaustible growth of scientific knowledge that you/they are formulated to each instant they are investigated and they pass to the land of the application.
On the other hand, the incessant advance of new technological resources of utility so much in the diagnostic sphere as therapy of the diverse illnesses in any area of the medical knowledge and that without a doubt, they have facilitated in great measure the professional work.
The continuous medical Education should it turns as a remedy to the formative deficiencies, a directive intervention to correct deviations, a strategy to renovate behaviors like a system of improvement of the knowledge in the health to always offer the patients the best thing.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. The Diabetes Program. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

  2. Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet 2004;364:1523-1537.

  3. Weinstein C, Mayer R. The teaching of learning strategies. En: Wittrock MC, editor. Handbook of research on reaching. New York: McMiIlan; 1999.

  4. Sprinthall N. Psicología de la educación. Sexta edición. México: McGraw Hill; 1999.

  5. Kember D. The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. Br J Educ Psycol 1998;68:395-407.

  6. Biggs J, Kember D. The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2E BrJ Educ Psychol 2001;71:133-49.

  7. Piaget J. Introducción a la epistemología genética. México: Paidós; 1987.

  8. Ralnan ME, Rahman 5, Musa AK. Knowledge and attitude of clinical students on problem based learning. Mymensingh Med J 2004;13(2):125-9.

  9. Aguilar-Salinas C, Velásquez MO, Gómez-Pérez FJ, González CA, Lara EA. Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes in México. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2021-6.

  10. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden diabetes 1995-2025 prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1414-31.

  11. Salcedo RA, García-de Alba GJ. Programa de atención integral al paciente diabético tipo 2. México: lMSS/CONACYT/UI5ESS; 2004.

  12. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. México: Secretaría de Salud, DGE; 2001.

  13. Dirección de Prestaciones Médicas. Norma que establece las disposiciones para implantar y desarrollar la Carrera Docente Institucional en el personal del área de la salud en el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Junio 10 de 2005. Clave 2000-001-013. Disponible en: http://wwwimss.gob.mxlobligaciones/ normateca/notmas/2000-001-0 13.pdf

  14. Spencer J, Blackmore D, Heard 5, McCrorie P, McHaffie D, Scherpbier A et al. Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students. Medical Education 2000;34(10):851-8 57.

  15. Marsh 14W. Still weighting for right criteria to validate student evaluations of teaching in the IDEA System. J Educ Psychol 1995;87:666-79.

  16. Finucanes L, Allery A, Haynes TM. Attitudes to reaching among teachers at a British medical school. Med Educ 1994;28:213-9.

  17. Miller AH. Student assessments of reaching in higher education. Higher Educ 1998;17:3-15.

  18. McKeachie WJ. Research on college teaching: The historical background. J Educ Psychol 1990;82:189-200.

  19. Marschall E, Palca J. Teaching on research. Science 1992;257:1200.

  20. Bowles LT. The evaluation of teaching. Med Teacher 2000;22:221-4.

  21. Zúñiga GS, Islas AS. Educación del paciente diabético. Un problema ancestral. Rev Med IMSS 2000;(3):187-91.

  22. Aguilar-Rebolledo F, Hernández HE. La educación médica continua. Parte I. ¿Una necesidad, una obligación, un compromiso? Plast & Rest Neurol 2006;5(1):58-61.

  23. Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life Course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q 2002;80:433-47.

  24. García A. Educación médica continua. Bases conceptuales de la educación permanente. UNED Madrid 1994;1:17-56.

  25. Abrahamson 5. Time coreturn medical schools to their primary purpose: education. Acad Med 1996;71:343-7.

  26. Viniegra VL. Educación y evaluación. Rev Med IMSS 2005;43(2):93-5.

  27. McKaechie WJ. Can evaluating instruction improve teaching? New Direct Teach Learn 1987;31:3-7.

  28. De Fuente JR, Piña-Garza E, Guriérrea-Ávila J. La formación del médico del siglo XXI y el Plan Único de Estudios de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Educ Med Salud 1994;28:331-340.

  29. Facultad de Medicina, Dirección General de Evaluación. Informe de evaluación de la docencia. Área básica y sociomédica, 2001-2002. México: UNAM; 2003.

  30. Metcalfe DH, Matharu M. Student’s perception of good and bad teaching: report of a critical incident study. Med Educ 1995;29:193-217.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com