medigraphic.com

2001, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2001; 24 (1)

Evaluation of the efficacy of low back pain management

Zaragoza LG, Guevara U

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 20-25
PDF size: 49.72 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Preliminary study in Pain Clinic identified incidence, prevalence and means etiology of LBP, the purpose of this study was to identify establishment management and yuor efficacy. 119 patients was assessments by a questionnaire, the tools used for measurement the outcomes was VAS, Roland functional disability scale and patient personal appraisal with respect to management. Results showed that incidence of LBP was 18.4%, average age 61.7+/-9.5, gender predominate was female, 36 patients was under to something pharmacology management (30.2%), 8.4% under TENS, 26.8% with epidural steroi injections, 4.20% tigger points and 30.2% had a multimodal treatment. There wasn´t difference between pain intensity and treatment establishment, likewise, personal report of satisfaction patient. Management multimodal is more efficacy than the unique modality. All patients referred high percentages of satisfaction.


REFERENCES

  1. Waddell G. Low Back Pain: A twentieth century health care enigma. Spine1996 Dec 15; 21 (24): 2820-5.

  2. Nachemson AL, Newest knowledge of Low Back Pain. A critical look. Clin Orthop 1992 Jun; (279): 8-20 Review

  3. Turk DC, Okifuji A. Perception of traumátic onset, compensation status, and physical findings: impact on pain. J Behav Med 1996 Oct; 19 (5): 435-53.

  4. Flor H., Fydrich, T and Turk. D.C., Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: A meta-analitic review, Pain, 1992;49: 221-230.

  5. Cutler, R.B., Fishbain, D. A., Rosomoff, H.L., Abdel-Moty, E, Khalil, T. M. And Rosomoff, R.S., Does nonsurgical pain center treatment of chronic pain return patients to work? A review and meta-analysis of the literature, Spine, 1994;19: 643-652.

  6. Telles, M. Guevara, LU, DeLille RF. Frecuencia, Manejo y Evolución de Lumbalgia y Radiculopatia: análisis de 5 años de experiencia de la clínica de dolor del INNSZ. Medicina Perioperatoria 1998; Vol 2: No.1, mayo agosto, 24-30.

  7. Linton S, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A Screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14: 209-215.

  8. Skovron T, balague F, Nordin M, Recovery pof severe sciatica. Spine 1999, Dec 1; 24 (23) 2516-24.

  9. Hall H, McIntosh G, Wilson L Melles T. Spontaneus Onset of Back Pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain 1998;14:129-133.

  10. Ho K, Spence J, Murphy MF: Preview of pain-measurement tools. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 24: 427-432.

  11. Roland M, Morris R: A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: developed of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983;8:141-144.

  12. Pain Outcomes. Shunk C, en Murray G: Orthopeaedic Physical therapy clinics of North America 1ª Ed Saunders Company.9: 1, March, 2000, 89-17.

  13. Koller. Lettters to the Editor. Lumbar epidural steroid injections: Is a Clinical Trial necessary or appropriate? Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 1999; 24: (1): 5-7.

  14. Rose-Innaes, Engstrom J. Low Back pain: An algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management. Geriatric October 1998; 53: 10 26-41.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com