medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2006, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2006; 66 (3)

Las revistas médicas y la metodología de sus escritos

Sosa MMC, Pablos HJL, Martínez SMC

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 143-147
PDF size: 143.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of this series of articles is to describe some relevant topics about medical journals an about the methodology of its articles. This article presents some historical issues of the beginnings of medical journals and peer review.


REFERENCES

  1. Rennie D. The present state of medical journals. Lancet. 1998;SII18-22.

  2. Relman AS. Journals. En: Warren KS [ed]. Coping with the biomedical literature. A primer for the scientist and the clinician. New York: Praeger Publishers 1981:67-78.

  3. Kronick DA. “Devant le deluge” and other essays on early modern scientific communication. Lanham UK: Scarecrow Press Inc;2004.

  4. Kronick DA. 10. Notes on the Printing history of the early Philosophical Transactions.”Devant le deluge” and other essays on early modern scientific communication. Lanham UK: Scarecrow Press Inc; 2004:153-79.

  5. Kronick DA. 7. Literature of the life sciences: the historical background. “Devant le deluge” and other essays on early modern scientific communication Lanham UK: Scarecrow Press Inc; 2004:113-30.

  6. Sigerist HE. Nationalism and internationalism in Medicine. Bull Hist Med. 1947;21:5-16. En: Kronick DA. 2. The historical background. The literature of the life sciences. Philadelphia: ISI Press:1985: 14-29.

  7. Lock S. Journalology: evolution of medical journals and some current problems. J Intern Med. 1992; 232(3):199-205.

  8. Booth CC. Medical communication: The old and the new. Br Med J. 1982;285:105-8.

  9. Somolinos-Palencia J. Las revistas científicas en México. II. Bosquejo histórico de las revistas científicas en México [simposio]. Gac Med Mex. 1989;125(11- 12):332-4.

  10. Ziman JM. Information, communication, knowledge. Nature. 1969;244:328-34. En: Kronick DA. 7. The literature of the life sciences: the historical background. “Devant le deluge” and other essays on early modern scientific communication. Lanham UK: Scarecrow Press Inc; 2004:113-30.

  11. Arndt KA. Information excess in medicine. Overview, relevance to dermatology and strategies for coping. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:1249-1256.

  12. Berry EM. The evolution of scientific and medical journals. N Engl Med. 1981;305:400-2.

  13. Durack DT. The weight of medical knowledge. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:773-5.

  14. Lundberg GD. The functions of refereed scientific journals. En: Weeks RA, Kinser DL [eds]. Editing the refereed scientific journal. Nueva York: IEEE Press 1994:1-6.

  15. Lock S. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press; 1986 Reprinted London: British Medical Journal 1991.

  16. Smith R. Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor. Twenty five years of adventure, discovery and conservatism [editorial]. Br Med J. 2004; 328:242-4.

  17. Fox T. Crisis in communication. The functions and future of medical journals. London: The Athone Press University of London 1965.

  18. Haynes RB. Loose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:724-8.

  19. Warren KS. From papyrus to parchment to paper to pixels: information technology and the future of biomedical publishing. En: Lock S [ed] The future of medical journals: In commemoration of 150 years of the British medical journal London. British Medical Journal. 1991:149-71.

  20. Burnham JC. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1323-9.

  21. Hays IJ. [Anuncio]. Am J Med Sci. 1827;1:vii. En Fye WB. Medical authorship: traditions, trends and tribulations Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:317-25.

  22. Kronick, DA. Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1321-2.

  23. Rosen MR, Hoffman BF. The cost of scientific communication: the scientist as an ad-man [editorial]. Circ Res. 1977;40:1-2.

  24. Fye WB. Medical authorship: traditions, trends and tribulations. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:317-25.

  25. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA. 1997;277:927-34.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com