Use of the male effect to induce reproductive activity in ovine intensive breeding systems

José de Lucas Tron; Luis Alberto Zarco Quintero; Carlos Vásquez Peláez

2008, Number 2

Next >>

Vet Mex 2008; 39 (2)

Use of the male effect to induce reproductive activity in ovine intensive breeding systems

Lucas TJ, Zarco QLA, Vásquez PC

Full text

How to cite this article

Language: English/Spanish
References: 47
Page: 117-127
PDF size: 358.20 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The presence of the male effect and its importance in the reproductive management of Columbia ewes was evaluated during a comparative study between a herd of ewes subjected to an annual breeding system with services in November (AS) and another herd subjected to an intensive system with breeding periods in November, July and March (IS). The two herds were kept on intensive irrigated prairies with moderate climate: the ewes in the IS were supplemented during the lactation and rebreeding periods. Estrus expression was detected by the presence of marks on the rump left by aniline-impregnated teaser males. In addition, the concentrations of progesterone were determined in blood samples from 20 adult ewes and 5 ewe-lambs from each breeding system. These samples were taken twice per week from the time the teaser males were introduced. The conception date for each ewe was retrospectively calculated from the date of lambing. The results indicate a clear male effect in the IS group during the breeding periods of July and March, when such a male effect proved to be very important for the reproductive success of the herd. In contrast, the male effect was not apparent during November breeding periods because the animals of both herds were already cycling when the teaser males were introduced at that time of the year. It is concluded that the use of the male effect can improve the reproductive effi ciency of Columbia ewes exposed to intensive breeding systems in Mexico.

REFERENCES

1.Dewi IAp, Owen JB, El-Sheik A, Axford RFE, Beigi-Nassiri M. Variation in ovulation rate and litter size of Cambridge sheep. Anim Sci 1996: 62: 489-495.
2.Notter DR, Copenhaver JS. Performance of Finnish Landrace crossbred ewes under accelerated lambing. I. Fertility, Prolifi cacy and ewe productivity. J Anim Sci 1980: 51:1033-1042.
3.Dzakuma JM, Stritzke DJ, Whiteman JV. Fertility and prolifi cacy of crossbred ewes under two cycles of accelerated lambing. J Anim Sci 1982. 54: 213-220.
4.Jenkins TG, Ford JJ. Productivity of ewes assigned to twice a year lambing compared to productivity of annual lambing ewes. Progress Report No. 4. Fort Collins, Colorado: Sheep Research Program. Agricultural Research Service. Department of Agriculture, 1991: 25-27.
Vesely JA. Induction of lambing every eight months in two breeds of sheep by light control with or without hormonal treatment. Anim Prod 1975; 21:165 -174.
Speedy AW, FitzSimons J. The reproductive performance of Finnish Landrace × Dorset Horn and Border Leicester × Scottish Blackface ewes mated three times in 2 years. Anim Prod 1977; 24: 189-196.
Rawlings NC, Jeffcoate IA, Howell WE. Response of purebred and crossbred ewes to intensifi ed management. J Anim Sci 1987; 65: 651-657.
Chemineau P, Moreno H, Delgadillo JA, Malpaux B.Estacionalidad reproductiva en pequeños rumiantes: mecanismos fi siológicos y técnicas para la inducción de una actividad sexual a contra estación. Memorias del III Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Especialistas en Pequeños Rumiantes y Camélidos Sudamericanos. 2003 mayo 7-9; Viña del Mar, Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editado por ALEPRyCS, 2003; 2:14-208.
9.Cushwa WT, Bradford GE, Stabenfeldt GH, Berger YM, Dally MR. Ram infl uence on ovarian and sexual activity in anestrus ewes: effects of isolation of ewes from rams before joining and date of ram introduction. J Anim Sci 1992; 70: 1195-1200.
Lara PJ, Gutiérrez YA, De Lucas TJ. Parámetros pro-ductivos y reproductivos de una explotación comercial Suffolk. Memorias del III Congreso Nacional de Producción Ovina; 1990 abril 25-28l; Tlaxcala (Tlaxcala) México. México(DF): Asociación Mexicana de Técnicos Especialistas en Ovinocultura, 1990: 121-124.
11.Ochoa CM, Urrutia MJ. Efecto macho en la raza Rambouillet durante la estación considerada de anestro. Téc Pecu Méx 1995; 33: 39-42.
12.Álvarez L, Galindo F, Zarco QL. Fenómenos reproductivos relacionados con interacciones sociales en rumiantes pequeños. Memorias del V Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Mexicana de Etología Veterinaria A.C. 2002 Febrero 14-15; Toluca (Estado de México) México. México DF: SOMEVET AC, 2002: 71-85
13.Schinkel PG. The effect of the ram on the incidence and occurrence of oestrus in ewes. Aust Vet J 1954; 30:189.
14.Louw BP, Marx FE, Yates GD. The infl uence of vasectomized rams on the lambing pattern of spring-mated Corriedale ewes. S Afr J Anim Sci 1974; 4:167-169.
15.Pearce DT, Holdham CM. The ram effect, Its mechaaspect nism and application to the management of sheep.In: Lindsay DR, Pearce LT, editors. Reproduction in Sheep. Cambridge: University Press, 1984: 26-34.
16.Urrutia J, Villalpando F, Meza HC, Mancilla C, Ramirez B. Effect of ram exposure on out-of-season reproductive performance of young maiden Merino Rambouillet ewes. Wool Tech Sheep Breed 2000; 48: 86-93.
17.García de ME. Modifi caciones al sistema de clasifi -cación climática de Köppen (para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana). 3a. ed. México DF: Instituto de Geografía de la UNAM, 1981; 192.
18.De Lucas TJ, González PE, Martínez RL. Estacionalidad reproductiva de cinco razas ovinas en el altiplano central mexicano. Téc Pecu Méx 1997; 35: 25-31.
19.Russel AJF, Doney JM, Gunn RG. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J Agric Sci 1969; 72: 451- 454.
20.Martínez RRD, Zarco QLA, Rubio GI, Cruz LC,Valencia MJ. Efecto de los implantes subcutáneos de melatonina y la suplementación alimentaria, sobre la inducción de la actividad ovárica en ovejas Pelibuey durante la época de anestro. Vet Mex 2001; 32: 237-247.
21.SID. Sheep Production Handbook. Edited by The American Sheep Industry Association, Production Education and Research Council. Denver, Colorado, USA: Paper Systems Inc. 1992;9.
22.Stellfl ug JN, Rodriguez F, LaVoie VA, Glimp HA. Infl uence of stimulated photoperiod alteration and induced estrus on reproductive performance of spring-born Columbia and Targhee ewe lambs. J Anim Sci 1994; 72: 29-33.
23.Veliz DFG, Vélez MLI, Flores CJA, Duarte MG, Poindron MP, Malpaux B et al. La presencia del macho en un grupo de cabras anéstricas no impide su respuesta a la introducción de un nuevo macho. Vet Méx 2004; 35:169-178.
24.Gabiña D. Improvement of the reproductive performance of Rasa Aragonesa fl ocks in frequent lambing systems. I. Effects of management systems, age of ewe and season. Livest Prod Sci 1989; 22: 69-85.