Language: Spanish
References: 98
Page: 391-402
PDF size: 149.87 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The purpose of this article is to show the principal contributions of the social network perspective to the understanding of drug use behavior and its treatment, based on a review of studies undertaken using this approach.
The study of social networks has become a new means of explaining the causality of numerous social phenomena. It has proved to be a valuable contribution to the understanding of various problems related to individuals’ physical and mental health, including drug use behavior.
The literature has shown that the study of social networks: contains the key to understanding drug use initiation and progression over time, since it has been proved that persons that use and abuse drugs are often surrounded by friends, relatives and acquaintances that abuse these substances or approve of this behavior.
Paradigm of social networks and drug consumption This approach comprises a set of theories, methods and techniques used to understand social relations and the way these relations can influence individual and group behavior.
This perspective assumes that the social network influences its members’ behavior to a certain extent and that the degree of influence will depend on the way this network is shaped, the person’s level of integration within the latter, the position the individual occupies, how he is linked to other members of the network and how important these links are in his life.
Social network studies analyze the relationships established by: individuals by examining their social network, defined as the set of significant individuals, family, friends and relationships established at school, university or work. They also analyze various components of social networks, such as their structure, type and the quality of the links and their function.
Within the field of the study of addictive behavior, the social network perspective has proved useful in examining the pattern of individuals’ relationships within their groups, analyzing the impact of this pattern on the level of similarity in substance use in these groups, and evaluating the influence of the peer group on behavior.
Influence of social network on drug use behavior: Various studies have repeatedly pointed out the influence of social networks on the various stages of addiction (starting, habituation and stopping). They have also shown that drug users’ networks undergo significant changes during each of these stages.
Several social factors have been linked to the starting, use and abuse of licit and illicit substances. The family, the prevailing norms in social networks and peer influence are the social aspects that have been most positively associated with this behavior.
As with starting and becoming accustomed to drug use, the family and the prevailing norms among members of the social network are regarded in the literature as prominent factors in stopping substance abuse.
Characteristics of drug users’ social networks: Several studies have been conducted to determine the nature of drug users’ networks. These studies are based on comparative analyses of the characteristics of drug users’ and non-users’ networks. They also analyze whether the characteristics of these networks vary according to certain variables such as sex, age, race, type of drug, etc.
Drug users’ networks are known to be generally smaller. It has also been reported that their networks are clearly distinct from those of the normal population, containing a larger number of abusers (including friends and family members) and persons with psychiatric dysfunctions.
Differences have also been found by type of drug; for example, opiate users’ networks comprise members involved in illegal behaviors, as opposed to other drug users’ networks.
Other studies have also reported differences in networks as regards gender, the most common one being that female drug users receive less social support from their networks than their male counterparts.
Influence of social networks on treatment: Most studies to determine the role of social links in the treatment and recovery of persons with drug use problems have highlighted the importance of the support of both relatives and friends in seeking treatment in a timely fashion and obtaining positive results both during and after treatment.
It has been shown that specific structures in drug users’ networks are closely linked to certain treatment-resistant behaviors and that seeking timely treatment, being able to stop taking drugs and successful treatment are possible thanks to the help of a network of relatives and friends with a high level of support.
Conclusions: Studies on social networks can provide a complementary approach to documenting and determining, through the analysis of individuals’ interpersonal relations, the influence of the social context on behaviors related to substance use.
The use of the social network approach has produced a considerable amount of literature throughout the world, which has permitted the development of new knowledge for the theoretical advancement of this phenomenon, as well as a set of instruments and techniques for supporting the work of researchers dedicated to explaining this problem in specific contexts.
REFERENCES
Sokolovsky J, Cohen C. Toward a resolution of methodological dilemmas in network mapping. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1981; 7:109-113.
Pattison, Pattison ML. Analysis of a schizophrenic psychosocial network. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1981;7:135-145.
Bravo MF. Redes sociales y evolución de la esquizofrenia. Madrid: Editorial Castalia; 1999; p.1-30.
Morris M. Epidemiology and social networks: Modeling structured diffusion. Sociological Methods Research 1993; 22:99-126.
Klovdahl A. Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: The AIDS example. Soc Sic Med 1994;38:79-88.
Friedman S, Neaigus A, Jose B, Curtis R, Goldstein M et al. Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. American J Public Health 1997;87(8):1289-1296.
Rosemberg F. Redes sociales y migración. En: Botinelli C. (coord).Migración y salud mental. México: ILEF/Randda Barnen; 1994; p.79-108.
Maya J, Martínez I, García F. Cadenas migratorias y redes de apoyo social de las mujeres peruanas en Sevilla, Demófilo. Revista Cultura Tradicional Andalucía 1999;29:87-105.
Rogers EM, Kincaid DL. Communication networks: A new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press; 1973.
Valente T, Gallaher P, Mouttapa M. Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: A transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use Misuse 2004;39(10):1685-1712.
Giordano C, Cernkovich A, Pugh M. Friendship and delinquency. Am J Sociol 1986;91:1170-1202.
Guilmore R, Hawkins J, Day L, Catalano R. Friendship and deviance: New evidence on an old controversy. J Early Adolesc 1994;1113-1128.
Hawkins J, Fraser MW. Social networks of street drug users: A comparison of two theories. Social Work Research Abstracts 1985;21(1):3-12.
Westermeyer J, Neider, J. Social networks and psychopathology among substance abusers. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:1265-1269.
Medina-Mora ME, Villatoro J, López E, Berenzon S, Carreño S et al.Factores asociados con el inicio y uso continuado de sustancias psicoactivas entre adolescentes mexicanos. Gac Med Mex 1995;131(4):383-93.
Villatoro J, Medina-Mora ME, Fleiz C, Rojano C. Bermúdez P et al. Estudios en estudiantes de enseñanza media y media superior. Ciudad de México. En: Observatorio Epidemiológico de Drogas. El fenómeno de las adicciones en México. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2001; p. 25-32.
Kandel D, Davies M. Friendship networks, intimacy, and illicit drug use in young adulthood: a comparison of two competing theories. Criminology 1991;29:441-469.
Latkin C, Mandell W, Vlahov A, Knowlton A, Oziemkowska M et al. Personal network characteristics as antecedents to needle- sharing and shooting gallery attendance. Social Networks, 1995;17:219-228.
Trotter R, Bowen A, Potter J. Network models for HIV outreach and prevention programs for drug users. USA: NIDA research monograph 151: Social networks, drug abuse, and HIV transmission; 1995; p. 144-180.
Needle RH, Coyle SL, Genser SG, Trotter R. Social networks, drug abuse, and HIV transmission. NIDA research monograph 151 networks, drug abuse, and HIV transmission; 1995.
Wellman B, Berkowitz S. Introduction: Studying social structures En: Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994; p 1-27.
Krohn M, Thornberry T. Network theory: A model for understanding drug abuse among African-American and Hispanic youth. NIDA Research Monograph 1993;130:102-28.
Requena F. El concepto de red social. Revista Española de Investigaciones 1989;49:137-152.
Molina JL. El análisis de redes sociales. Una introducción. Barcelona: Bellatera Ediciones; 2001.
Brook JS, Nomura C, Cohen P. A network of influences on adolescent drug involvement: neighborhood, school, peer, and family. Genet Soc Gen Psychol 1989;115:123–145.
Ramírez MG, Caballero JR, Ramírez MG. Subculturas de riesgo para la salud en una red social de adolescentes escolares. En: Investigaciones en salud de adolescentes. Bettylu II, Rasmussen Cruz, Alfredo Hidalgo (eds.) Guadalajara: 2005; p.291.
Machín J, Solano M, Tarango B, Velasco M. Aplicación del análisis de redes sociales para la intervención en fármaco-dependencias. Trabajo presentado en el Congreso Anual de la Internacional Network Conference; México: 2004.
Kandel D. Adolescent marihuana use: role of parents and peers. Science 1973;181(104):1067-70.
Boyd CJ, Mieczkowski T. Drug use, health, family and social support in «crack» users. Addict Behav 1990;15:481–5.
Burton RP, Johnson RJ, Ritter C. The effects of role socialization of the initiation of cocaine use: an event history analysis from adolescence into middle adulthood. J Health Soc Behav 1996;37:75–90.
Levy SJ, Pierce JP. Predictors of marijuana use and uptake among teenagers in Sydney, Australia. Int J Addict 1990;25: 1179–93.
Von Sydow K, Lieb R, Pfister H. What predicts incident use of cannabis and progression to abuse and dependence? A 4-year prospective examination of risk factors in a community sample of adolescents and young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 1:49–64.
Williams JG, Smith JP. Alcohol and other drug use among adolescents: family and peer influences. J Subst Abuse 1993; (5):289–94.
Neaigus A, Miller M, Friedman SR. Potential risk factors for the transition to injecting among non-injecting heroin users: a comparison of former injectors and never injectors. Addiction 2001;96:847–60.
Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiol Rev 2004;26:36-52.
Madianos MG, Gefou-Madianou D, Richardson C. Factors affecting illicit and licit drug use among adolescents and young adults in Greece. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995;4:258–64.
Schroeder JR, Latkin CA, Hoover DR, Curry AD, Knowlton AR et al. Illicit drug use in one’s social network and in one’s neighborhood predicts individual heroin and cocaine use. NIDA. Ann Epidemiol 2001;11(6):389-94.
Gaughan M. Predisposition and pressure: mutual influence an adolescent drunkenness. Connections 2003;25(2):17-31.
Latkin CA, Hua W, Forman VL. The relationship between social network characteristics and exchanging sex for drugs or money among drugs users in Baltimore. Int J STD AIDS, 2003; (11):770-5.
Latkin CA, Hua W, Tobin K. Social network correlates of self-reported non-fatal overdose. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 73(1):61-7.
Goehl L, Nunes E, Quit F, Hilton I. Social networks and methadone treatment outcome: the costs and benefits of social ties. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993;19(3):25.
McDonald E, Luxmore M, Pica S, Tanti C, Blackman J et al. The quantity and quality of relationships at different stages of substance use treatment. Community Mental Health J 2004; 40(5):451-464.
West R, Mc Ewen A, Bolling K, Owen L. Smoking cessation and smoking patterns in the general population: a 1-year follow-up. Addiction 2001;96(6):891-902.
Waldorf D. Natural recovery from opiate addiction: some social-psychological process of untreated recovery. J Drug Issues 1983;13(2):237-280.
Jorquez J. The retirement phase of heroin using careers. J Drug Issues 1983;13(3):343-365.
Fraser M, Hawkins J. Social network analysis and drug misuse. Social Science Review, 1984;58:81-97.
Uchtenhagen A, Zimmer-Hofler. Heroinsuchtige und ihre normalen altersgenossen. Publikation Schweizerischen Nationalfonds 1987; p300.
Delgado A, Navarro R, Rodríguez A, Sánchez J. Redes sociales en adictos a alcohol y opiáceos. XX Jornadas Nacionales de socidroalcohol. Córdoba: Libro de ponencias; 1992; p.444-459.
Havassy B, Wasserman D, Hall S. Social relationships and abstinence from cocaine in an American treatment sample. Addiction 1995;90:699–710.
Madanes C, Dukes J, Harbin H. Family ties of heroin addicts, Archives General Psychiatry 1980;37:889-894
Schilit R, Gomberg E. Social support structures of women in treatment for alcoholism. Health Soc Work 1987;12(3):187-95.
O’Dell KJ, Turner NH, Weaver GD. Women in recovery from drug mi suse: an exploratory study of their social networks and social support. Substance Use Misuse 1998;33(8):1721-34.
Thoits PA. Life stress, social support, and psychological vulnerability: Epidemiological considerations. J Community Psychology 1982;10:341-362.
Cohen S, Syme S. Social support and health. San Francisco: Academic Press; 1985.
Pearlin L. The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav 1989;30(3):241-56.
Ellickson PL, Bell RM. Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test. Science 1990;250(4982):739-40.
Gainey R, Peterson P, Wells E, Hawkins JD, Catalano R. The social networks of cocaine users seeking treatment. Addiction Research 1995;3(1):17-32.
Medina-Mora ME, Mariño MC, Escotto J, De La Fuente JR. El uso de servicios en una muestra de alcohólicos mexicanos. Salud Mental 1997;20:(2):24-31.
Solís L, Cordero M. El uso de servicios y las recaídas de los pacientes alcohólicos en tratamiento. Salud Mental 2003; 22(2):1-6.
Galanter M. Postgraduate certification in alcohol and drug dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1985;9(5):387-9.
Knight DK, Simpson DD. Influences of family and friends on client progress during drug abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse 1996;8(4):417-29.
Wasserman D, Stewart A, Delucchi K. Social support and abstinence from opiates and cocaine during opioid maintenance treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001;65(1):65-75.
Kooyman M. The drug problem in the Netherlands. J Subst Abuse Treat, 1984;1(2):125-30.
Conner KR, Shea RR, McDermott MP, Grolling R, Tocco RV et al. The role of multifamily therapy in promoting retention in treatment of alcohol and cocaine dependence. Am J Addict 1998; 7(1):61-73.
Dobkin PL, Paraherakis A, Gill K. The role of functional social support in treatment retention and outcomes among outpatient adult substance abusers. Addiction 2002;97(3):347-56.
Valente T. Social networks influences on Adolescent substance use: An introduction. Connections 2003;25(2):11-16.
Kirke D. Teenagers and substance use. Social networks and peer influence. Great Britain: Ed. Algarbe Mc Millan; 2004; p. 10-27.
Kandel D. Marijuana users in young adulthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41(2):200-9.
Kosterman R, Hawkins JD, Guo J, Catalano RF, Abbott RD. The dynamics of alcohol and marijuana initiation: patterns and predictors of first use in adolescence. Am J Public Health 1987;90(3):360-6.
Wills TA, Vaughan R. Social support and substance use in early adolescence. J Behav Med 1989;12(4):321-39.
Zhang L, Welte JW, Wieczorek WF. Peer and parental influences on male adolescent drinking. Substance Use Misuse 1997;32(14):2121-36.
Guo J, Hill KG, Hawkins JD. A developmental analysis of sociodemographic, family, and peer effects on adolescent illicit drug initiation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41:838-45.
Latkin CA, Knowlton AR, Hoover D, Mandell W. Drug network characteristics as a predictor of cessation of drug use among adult injection drug users: a prospective study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1999;25(3):463-73.
Unger JB, Rohrbach LA, Howard-Pitney B, Ritt-Olson A, Mouttapa M. Peer influences and susceptibility to smoking among California adolescents. Substance Use Misuse 2001; 36(5):551-71.
Li X, Zhuo Y, Stanton B. Illicit drug initiation among institutionalized drug users in China. Addiction 2002;97:575-82.
German D, Sherman SG, Siriojn B, Thomson N, Aramrattana A et al. Motivations for methamphetamine cessation among young people in northern Thailand. Addiction 2006;101(8):1143-52.
Costenbader EC, Astone NM, Latkin CA. The dynamics of injection drug users personal networks and HIV risk behaviors. Addiction 2006;101(7):913-4.
Sulaiman P, Wylie J. Correlates of needle sharing among Winnipeg injection drug users. [Abstract]. En: International Sunbelt Social Networks Conference. Redondo Beach, Ca: Sunbelt XXV; 2005; p.84.
Neaigus A, Miller M, Friedman SR. Potential risk factors for the transition to injecting among non-injecting heroin users: a comparison of former injectors and never injectors. Addiction 2001;96:847–60.
Nygaard P. Focus on secondary prevention: implications of a study on intervention in social networks. Substance Misuse 2006;41(13):1719-33.
De P, Jolly A, Cox J, Boivin JF. Characterizing the drug-injecting networks of cocaine and heroin injectors in Montreal. Can J Public Healt 2006;97(3):207-9.
Reifman A, Watson WK, Mc Court A. Social networks and college drinking: probing processes of social influence and selection. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2006;32(6):820-32.
Semple SJ, Grant I, Patterson TL. Perceived behavior of others and AIDS risk behavior among heterosexually-identified methamphetamine users. J Psychoactive Drugs Suppl 2006;3:405-13.
Groh DR, Jason LA, Davis MI, Olson BD, Ferrari JR. Friends, family, and alcohol abuse: an examination of general and alcohol-specific social support. Am J Addict 2007;16(1):49-55.
Pivnick A. Kinchart-sociograms as a method for describing the social networks of drug-using women. [Abstract]. En: International Sunbelt Social Networks Conference. USA: Sunbelt XXV; 1990; p.146.
Latkin C, Mandell W, Oziemkowska M, Celentano D, Vlahov D et al. Using social network analysis to study patterns of drug use among urban drug users at high risk for HIV/AIDS. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995;38(1):1-9.
Williams ML, Zhuo Z, Siegal HA, Robles RR, Trotter RT et al. A comparison of drug use networks across three cities. NIDA Res Monogr 1995;151:109-30.
Pivnick A, Jacobson A, Eric K, Doll L. AIDS, HIV infection, and illicit drug use within inner-city families and social networks. American J Public Health 1994;84(2):271-274.
Auerswald CL, Sugano E, Ellen JM, Klausner JD. Street-based STD testing and treatment of homeless youth are feasible, acceptable and effective. J Adolesc Health 2006;38(3):208-12.
Lakon C, Leighton D. Correlates of having injection drug users as sexual network members [Abstract]. En: International Sunbelt Social Networks Conference. Sydney: Sunbelt XXV; 2006; p.130.
Howard D Latkin C. Bridge over troubled waters: factors associated with non-injection drug users having injection drug-using sex partners. JAIDS 2006;42:325-330.
Sha L, Jolly A, Wylie J. The Winnipeg social network injection drug use study: personal risk networks and of hepatitis c and HIV infection. [Abstract]. En: International Sunbelt Social Networks Conference. Sunbelt XXV; 2005; p.54.
Rhoads DL. A longitudinal study of life stress and social support among drugs abusers. Int J Addict 1983;8(2):195-222.
Fraser M, Hawkins J. The social networks of opioid abusers Int J Addict 1984;19(8):903-17.
Hawkins J, Fraser MW. The social networks of drugs abusers before and after treatment. Int J Addict 1987;22(4):343-55.
Richardson L. Social network characteristics and substance abuse treatment outcome. Dissertation abstracts international. Sciences Engineering 2001;61(7-16).
Davey M, Latkin C, Hua W, Tobin KE, Strathdee S. Individual and social network factors that predict entry to drug treatment. Am J Addict 2007;16(1):38-45.
Full text