Vergara AE

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 309-315
PDF size: 305.64 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: It is important to understand the spatial relation between the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN), the radial head, and the supinator muscle in pronation or supination. The objectives of this study are: to describe of the PIN and how it is related with the supinator muscle; to measure the distance between the PIN and the radius while the forearm is pronated or supinated; to determine the best interval for the approach of proximal radius. Material and methods: We conducted this study with 18 fresh cadavers. A lateral approach was made, and identification of the PIN and how it was related with the supinator muscle was described. We made the measurements and they were analyzed. Results: The PIN penetrated the supinator muscle 3.8 cm ± 0.48 from the epicondyle and its location was always intramuscular. It was never in contact with the periosteum. The PIN split in 4-7 branches (for the extensor muscles) after a mean of 6 cm ± 0.75 (4.8-8.0), following the exit from the muscle; with pronation the nerve moved 1.03 cm ±0.31. Discussion:The interval between the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) was easy to identify and proved to be a safe zone for approaching the PIN. In our study no contact between the nerve and the periosteum of the radius was found, but it should be kept in mind when dissecting the muscle from the radius proximally. We found a minimum distance of 4.8 cm from the nerve’s exit from supinator muscle with respect to the radial head. This is the safe zone recommended when cutting the muscle. Pronation moved the nerve away 1 cm, so this maneuver is advisable for the approach of proximal radius.

REFERENCES

1. Prasartritha T, Liupolvanish P, Rojanakit A: A study of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and the radial tunnel in 30 Thai cadavers. J Hand Surg 1993; 18A: 107-12.

2. Abrams RA, Ziets RJ, Lieber RL, Botte MJ: Anatomy of the radial nerve motor branches in the forearm. J Hand Surg 1997; 22A: 232-7.

3. Thomas SJ, Yakin DE, Parry BR, Lubahn JD: The anatomical relationship between the posterior interosseous nerve and the supinator muscle. J Hand Surg 2000; 25A: 936-41.

4. Diliberti T, Botte MJ, Abrams RA: Anatomical considerations regarding the posterior interosseous nerve during posterolateral approaches to the proximal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82(6): 809-13.

5. Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P: The Elbow. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1994: 83-115.

6. Witt JD, Kamineni S. The posterior interosseous nerve and the posterolateral approach to the proximal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(2): 240-2.

7. Patterson S, Bain G, Mehta J. Surgical approaches to the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 370: 19-33.

8. Kaplan EB. Surgical approach to the proximal end of the radius and its use in fractures of the head and neck of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1941; 23: 86-92.

9. Lawton JN, Cameron-Donaldson M, Blazar PE, Moore JR: Anatomic considerations regarding the posterior interosseous nerve at the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16(4): 502-7.

10. Tornetta P 3rd, Hochwald N, Bono C, Grossman M: Anatomy of the posterior interosseous nerve in relation to fixation of the radial head. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 345: 215-8.

11. Strachan JC, Ellis BW: Vulnerability of the posterior interosseous nerve during radial head resection. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 53B: 320-3.

12. Ring D, Quintero J, Jupiter J: Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 1811-5.

13. Mekhail AO, Ebraheim NA, Jackson WT, Yeasting RA. Anatomic considerations for the anterior exposure of the proximal portion of the radius. J Hand Surg (Am) 1996; 21: 794-801.