Carrillo SM

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 77-85
PDF size: 64.40 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The use of retroalimentation and computer games in the rehabilitation of patient with deficit of motor frontal and brain vascular stroke. The paper shows the use to bioretrofeeding in the spastic muscles in the ponetic thoracic member and the possible use of the computer plays for complement the treatment this is a clinical control study of two groups of 20 patients each to evaluate the results using the modified ash word scale. The difference of the two groups was not important however we belive that the suse of motivation with games in the computer is important aide in the treatment with patients with more of a year of evolution.

REFERENCES

1. Cantú C, Tálama O, Mejía A, Rodríguez J, Murillo L, Osorno M, et al. Prevención primaria de la enfermedad vascular cerebral, Rev Inv Clin 2002;54:247-56.

2. Van der Lee J. Wagenaar R, Lankhorst G, Vogelaar T, Devillé W, Souter L. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients, Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369-75.

3. Hallet M, Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:211-7.

4. Morris D, Crago J, Luca S, Pidikiti R, Taub E. Constrain induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil 1997;9:29-43.

5. Van der Lee J. Constrain induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different?, Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14:741-4.

6. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constrain induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation, a clinical review, J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237-51.

7. Wolf S, Lecraw D, Sarton L, Jann S. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head injured patients, Exp Neurol 1989; 104:125-32.

8. Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh S, Taub E. Increased use of the left hand in string players associated with increased cortical representation of the fingers. Science 1995;220:21-3.

9. Liepert J, Sauder H, Sommer M. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.

10. Wiltner W, Sauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E, Effects of constraint induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke, a replication. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.

11. Dromerick A, Edwards D, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke 2000;31:2984-8.

12. Kunkel A, Kopp S, Muller G, Virllringer K, Virllringer A, Taub E, et al. Constraint induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-8.

13. Sabari J, Kane L, Flanagan S, Steinberg A. Constraint - induced motor relearning after stroke: a naturalistic case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:524-8.

14. Sterr A, Freivogel S, Schmalohr D. Neurobehavioural aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1726-31.

15. Schaechter J, Kraft E, Hilliard T, Dijkhuizen R, Senner T, Finklestein S, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:326-38.

16. Basmaajian J. Biofeedback principes and practice for clinicians. 3a edition, Baltimore Williams & Willkins, 1989.

17. Schleenbaker R, Mainous A. Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med RehabiI 1993;74:1301-4.

18. Brudny J, Korein J, Grynbaum B, Friedmann L, Winstein S, Sachs-Frankel G, et al. EMG feedback therapy: review of treatment of 114 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1976;57:55-71.

19. Taub E, Wolf S. Constrain induced techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics Rehabil 199;3:38-61.

20. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. “Mini-mental state” a practical method for gradinf the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychyatr Res 1975;12:189-98.

21. Taub E, Miller N, Novack T, Cook E, Fleming W, Nepomuceno C. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.

22. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraintinduced Movement Therapy; a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation, a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Development 1999;36:237-51.

23. Reinkensmeyer D, Pang C, Nessler J, Painter C. Web - based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke. IEEE Transactions Neural Sys Rehabil Engine 2002;2:102-8.

24. Hendricks H, Van Limbeek J, Zwarts M. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629-37.

25. Alberts J, Butler A, Wolf S. The effects of constraint induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004;18:250.

26. Levy C, Nichols D, Schmalbrock O, Keller P, Chakeres D, Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper linb stroke hemiplegia treated with induced movement therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:4-12.

27. Inglis J, Donald M, Mopnga T, Sproule M, Young M. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:755-9.