medigraphic.com

2008, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Vet Mex 2008; 39 (1)

Salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis, the most prevalent zoonosis in the world

Gutiérrez CAC, Paasch MLH, Calderón ANL

Language: English/Spanish
References: 46
Page: 81-90
PDF size: 144.73 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Nowadays salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis are the most prevalent diseases transmitted to humans through contaminated food of animal origin in developed countries. Propagation of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium has increased since the second half of the twentieth century, derived from two changes in the epidemiology of salmonellosis that occurred worldwide: the emergence of human infections caused by Salmonella Enteritidis, and the multiple resistances against antibiotics of Salmonella Typhimurium strains. Most retrospective studies suggest an epidemiological relationship between human infections and poultry products. Modernization of poultry industry and exportation of progenitor stock birds have played an important roll disseminating Salmonella Enteritidis. Campylobacteriosis is the most frequent enteric bacterial diseases in developed countries. Campylobacter jejuni is the most frequent cause of acute infectious diarrheas, and the sources of infection are mainly poultry products. The present review includes relevant taxonomic and pathogenic aspects of these organisms; and stresses the problematic of diagnosis and detection, analyzing techniques that permit rapid detection of animal carriers. Finally, some preliminary findings, not yet published, suggest that a prevalence of salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis in Mexican poultry farms must be similar to that found in other countries with massive poultry production; therefore, epidemiological studies to determine the frequency of human infections, derived from poultry consumption, are recommended.


REFERENCES

  1. Hinton MH. Infections and intoxications associated with animal feed and forage which may present a hazard to human health. Vet J 2000; 159:124-138.

  2. World Health Organization. Global aspects of emerging and potential zoonoses: a WHO perspective. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997; 3:223-228.

  3. International Food Safety Authorithies Network (INFOSAN) Red Internacional de Autoridades de Inocuidad de los alimentos. Nota de información INFOSAN 3/2005-Salmonella. 13 de abril de 2005. Unión Europea. Trends and sources of zoonotic agents

  4. in animals, feeding stuffs, food and man in the European Union and Norway in 2002. Serial online:2004 Sept 29. Cited: 2004 Oct 28. Available from: http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biosafety/salmonella/zoonoses.

  5. Kapperud G, Stenwig H, Lassen J. Epidemiology of Salmonella Typhimurium 0:4-1 infection in Norway: evidence of transmission from an avian wildlife reservoir. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147:774-782.

  6. Wierup M, Engström B, Engavall A, Wahlström H. Control of Salmonella Enteritidis in Sweden. Food Microbio 1995; 25:219-226.

  7. Velge P, Cloeckaert A, Barrow P. Emergence of Salmonella epidemics: The problems related to Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in multiple antibiotic resistance in other major serotypes. Vet Res 2005; 36:267-288.

  8. Gutiérrez-Gogco L, Montiel-Vázquez E, Aguilera-Pérez P, González-Andrade MC. Serotipos de Salmonella identificados en los servicios de salud de México. Salud Pública de México 2000; 42:490-495.

  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization. Discussion paper on risk management strategies for Salmonella spp in poultry; 2003 Jan 27-Febr 1; Orlando (Florida) USA. Orlando (Florida) USA: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Codex Committee on Food Hygiene. Third-fifth Session. 2003:11.

  10. Lamoureux M, Mackay A, Messier S, Fliss I, Blais BW, Holley RA et al. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni in food and poultry viscera using immunomagnetic separations and microtitre hibridation. J Appl Microbiol 1997; 83:641-651.

  11. Nielsen EM, Nielsen NL. Serotypes and typability of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from poultry products. Int J Food Microbiol 1999; 46:199-205.

  12. Pearson AD, Greenwood MH, Feltham RK, Healing TD, Donaldson J, Jones DM et al. Microbial ecology of Campylobacter jejuni in a United Kingdom chicken supply chain: intermittent common source, vertical transmission, and amplification by flock propagation. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996; 62:4614-4620.

  13. Neimann J, Engberg J, Molbak K, Wegener, H.C. Risk Factors associated with sporadic campylobacteriosis in Denmark. 4th World Congress, Food borne Infections and intoxications; 1998 June 7-12; Berlin, Germany. Berlin, Germany: Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 1998: 43-54.

  14. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Gheesling LL. Supplement 2001 (No. 45) to the Kauffmann-White scheme. Res Microbiol 2003; 154:173-174.

  15. Uzzau S, Brown DJ, Wallis T, Rubino S, Leori G, Bernard S et al. Host adapted serotypes of Salmonella enterica. Epidemiol Infect 2000; 125: 229-255.

  16. Ward LR, de Sa JD, Rowe B. A phagetyping scheme for Salmonella Enteritidis. Epidemiol Infect 1987; 99: 291-294.

  17. Duchet SM, Mompart F, Berthelot F, Beaumont C, Lechopier P, Pardon P. Differences in frequency, level and duration of cecal carriage between four outbreed chicken lines infected orally with Salmonella Enteritidis. Avian Dis 1997; 41:559-567.

  18. Humphrey TJ. Contamination of egg shell and contents with Salmonella Enteritidis: a review. Int J Food Microbiolol 1994; 21:31-40.

  19. Holt PS. Molting and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection: the problem and some solutions. Poult Sci 2003; 82:1008-1010.

  20. Mollenhorst H, Van Woudenbergh CJ, Bokkers EGM, y Boer IJM. Risk factors for Salmonella Enteritidis infection in laying hens. Poult Sci 2005; 84: 1308-1313.

  21. Van de Giessen AW, Ament AJHA, Notermans SHW. Intervention strategies for Salmonella Enteritidis in poultry flocks: a basic approach. International J Food Microbiol 1994; 21:145-154.

  22. Ward LR, Therefall J, Smith HR, O’Brien SJ, Riemann H, Kass P et al. Salmonella Enteritidis epidemic. Science 2000; 287:1753-1754.

  23. Henzler DJ, Opitz HM. The role of mice in the epizootiology of Salmonella Enteritidis infection on chicken layer farms. Avian Dis 1992; 36:625-631.

  24. Friedman CR, Malcom G, Rigau-Perez JG, Arambulo P, Tauxe RV. Public health risk from Salmonella-based rodenticides. Lancet 1996; 347:1705-1706.

  25. Guard PJ, Henzler DJ, Rahmann MM, Carlson RW. Onfarm monitoring of mouse-invasive Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and a model for its association with the production of contaminated eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63:1588-1593.

  26. Threlfall EJ, Ridley AM, Ward LR, Rowe B. Assessment of health risk from Salmonella-based rodenticides. Lancet 1996; 348:616-617.

  27. Helmuth R, Schroeter A. Molecular typing methods for S. Enteritidis. Int J Food Microbiol 1994; 21:69.

  28. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 2000; 405:299-304.

  29. Chacana PA, Terzolo HR. Protection Conferred by a Live Salmonella Enteritidis Vaccine Agaist Fowl Typhoid in Laying Hens. Avian Dis 2006; 50:280-283.

  30. Boyd D, Peters GA, Cloeckaert A, Boumedine KS, Chaslus-Dancla E, Imbereschts H et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of a 43 kilobase genomic island associated with the multidrug resistance region of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT 104 and its identification in phage type DT 120 and serovar Agona. J Bacteriol 2002; 5725-5732.

  31. Angulo FJ, Johnson KR, Tauxe RV. Origins and consequences of antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella: implications for the use of fluoroquinolones in food animals. Microb Drug Resist 2000; 6:77-83.

  32. Petersen L, Nielsen EM, On SWL. Serotype and genotype diversity and hatchery transmission of Campylobacter jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Vet Microbiol 2001; 82:141-145.

  33. Phillips, CA. Incidence, epidemiology and prevention of food borne Campylobacter species. Trends Food Sci Technol 1995; 6: 83-87.

  34. Federighi M. Campylobacter et hygiène des aliments. Paris, France: Ed. Polytechnica, 1999.

  35. Talibart R, Denis M, Castillo A, Cappelier JM, Ermel G. Survival and recovery of viable but noncultivable forms of Campylobacter in aqueous microcosm. Int J Food Microbiol 2000; 55:263-267.

  36. Wassenaar TM, Newell DG. The Genus Campylobacter. New York: Springer New York, 2007.

  37. Barrow PA, Page K. Inhibition of colonization of the alimentary tract in young chickens with Campylobacter jejuni by pre-colonization with strains of C.jejuni. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000; 182:87-91.

  38. Kramer J, Visscher AH, Wagenaar JA, Jeurissen SHM. Entry and survival of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis PT4 in chicken macrophage and lymphocyte cell lines. Vet Microbiol 2003; 91:147-155.

  39. Asheg AA, Levkut M, Revajova V, Sevcikova Z, Kolodzieyski L, Pistl J. Dynamics of Lymphocyte Subpopulations in Inmmune Organs of Chickens Infected with Salmonella Enteritidis. Acta Vet Brno 2003; 72:359-364.

  40. Brooks BW, Robertson RH; Henning D. Garcia MM. Production and Western blot characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Rapid Methods Automation Microbiol 1995; 4:155-164.

  41. Neil SD, Campell NJ, Greene JA. Campylobacter species in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol 1984; 13:777-785.

  42. Clark AG, Bueschkens DH. Survival and growth of Campylobacter jejuni in egg yolk and albumen. J Food Prot 1986; 49:135-141.

  43. Cox NA, Hofacre CL, Bailey JS, Buhr RJ, Wilson JL, Hiett KL. Presence of Campylobacter jejuni in Various Organs One Hour, One Day, and One Week Following Oral or Intracoacal Inoculations of Broiler Chicks. Avian Dis 2005; 49:155-158.

  44. Oyarzabal O, Murphy B. Campylobacter and Arcobacter. Int Food Hyg 1998; 9:29-30.

  45. Bülte M, Jakob P. The use of PCR- generated invA probe for the detection of Salmonella spp in artifi cially and naturally contaminated foods. Int J Food Microbiol 1995; 26:335-344.

  46. Skanseng B, Kaldhusdal M, Knut R. Comparison of chicken gut colonizations by pathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens by real-time quantitative PCR. Mol Cell Probes 2006; 20:269-279.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com