Next >>
Salud Mental 2007; 30 (3)
Language: Spanish
References: 67
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 93.49 Kb.
ABSTRACT
This work presents a critical review of the historical, theoretical, and neurobiological bases of the theory of moral emotions. Neuroimaging methods and protocols used to study the neural correlates of moral emotions and the analysis of the brain functions involved in their processing, permit the formulation of hypotheses that attempt to understand some emotional and cognitive processes related to moral emotions. One such hypothesis refers to a neuro-matrix involving sensory systems, brainstemmediated physiological reactions and frontal brain regions processing the interaction between moral and emotional stimuli.
Cross-cultural research on human facial expression has identified universal patterns to express basic emotions such as fear, anger, or happiness. Nevertheless, the experience of some emotions and their facial expressions are regulated by social and cultural mechanisms. This type of regulation is observed in moral emotions since they are linked to the interests or welfare either of society as whole, or of persons other than the judge or agent.
Two typical features that identify moral emotions are their typical elicitors and tendencies towards specific actions. The release of a moral emotion is the perception of implicit and explicit violations of social norms and stereotypes included in personal codes, attitudes, and beliefs. In turn, the actions ensuing from moral emotions are communal or prosocial, because they promote a benefit in others and/or in the social order. Although there is not a definitive taxonomy of moral emotions, four families of prosocial feelings are suggested: a) other-condemning emotions (contempt, anger, disgust); b) self-conscious emotions (shame, embarrassment, guilt); c) other-suffering emotions (compassion); d) other-praising emotions (gratitude, awe, elevation).
Such emotions are relevant to the concept of morality because this is a complex representation that includes models of prohibited actions, notions of good and bad, concepts of fairness, ideals of justice, or justifications of punitive actions. Moreover, the cognitive processes and behaviors involved in moral emotions are related to the theory of mind that refers the ability to represent the mental and emotional states of others, such as their thoughts, desires, beliefs, intentions, and knowledge. The neurobiological substrate of this capacity involves cerebral regions related to the experience of basic emotions, such as the amygdala and the cingulated cortex, and regions related to complex cognition and emotional-social contexts, such as the prefrontal cortex and the superior temporal sulcus.
Neurobiological approaches to moral emotions have become relevant to study psychopathologies linked to antisocial behaviors, particularly the psychopathic or Antisocial Personality Disorder. Psychopaths show decreased emotional and physiological reactions to emotional stimuli and deficiencies to identify emotional expressions. However, they do not fail to represent or to infer others mental states or theory of mind. Therefore, the psychopathic disorder is not only linked to distortions in interpreting socially-learned moral values, but also to alterations of cognitive processes required to link the affective system to moral values. This assumption is supported by brain-imaging studies demonstrating the involvement of areas associated to the processing of complex social stimulus and language, such as prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, polar frontal cortex, and anterior temporal lobe in psychopathic patients. The affected areas also include regions such as the amygdala, ventromedial hypothalamus, thalamus, and caudate nucleus involved in the experience or expression of emotions.
Scientific publications directly referring to the neurobiological research of moral emotions and the evaluation of moral judgments occupy a period between 2001 and 2005. The neurobiology of moral emotions has evolved rapidly by the use neuro-imaging techniques such as Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Brain images related to moral emotions are obtained by the use of moral stimuli in three types of situations: (a) while subjects resolve cognitive tasks, for example, reading moral emotional statements, (b) during passive or instructed viewing of affective pictures, or (c) during the resolution of moral dilemmas.
The brain areas that become significantly active during these tasks provide a neurobiological interpretation of the mental operations involved in moral emotions. Thus, the medial frontal gyrus is activated during the elaborate personal and impersonal moral judgments produced by viewing moral pictures, attributing intentionality of movement, processing of facial expressions, and during the attribution of mental states (theory of mind). The posterior cingulated, restrosplenial, and precuneus cortex are associated with the elaboration of moral judgments elicited by viewing moral pictures and theory of mind. The superior temporal sulcus and the parietal lobe are related with moral judgments while viewing moral and emotional pictures and films, and attributing intentional movements. The superior temporal sulcus is also associated with the processing of social contexts. Orbitofronal and ventromedial frontal cortex is associated with the processing of simple moral judgments while viewing moral pictures, the evaluation of emotionally-charged social events, during empathy and attribution. The temporal pole is also associated with theory of mind, the elaboration of simple moral judgments and with the recalling of emotional situations. The amygdala is activated during the processing of moral pictures and social events based on facial expressions.
Other empirical investigations involving a moral interpretation of data such as studies of general emotions, empathy, theory of mind, neurological disorders, and antisocial behavior, are also relevant to understand the brain activation patterns associated to cognitive and emotional social functions. Working models of psychopathologies that manifest antisocial behaviors are also required to interpret neuroimaging data. Meta-analyses of human behavior and proto-moral behavior in non-human species related to the elaboration of moral judgments and emotions are also relevant for the same purpose. Finally, moral emotion research requires the elaboration of accurate protocols based on psychological approaches directed to elicit particular moral emotions which enable the definition and neural substrates of its specific qualities.
REFERENCES
ANDERSON SW, BECHARA A, DAMASIO H, TRANEL D, DAMASIO AR: Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci, 2:1032-1037, 1999.
ARSENIO WF, LEMERISE EA: Aggression and moral development: integrating social information processing and moral domain models. Child Dev, 75:987-1002, 2004.
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Washington, 1995.
BARTELS A, ZEKI S: The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage, 21:1155-1166, 2004.
BEER JS, HEEREY EA, KELTNER D, SCABINI D, KNIGHT RT: The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. J Pers Soc Psychol, 85:594-604, 2003.
BENNETT M, MATTHEWS L: The role of second-order belief-understanding and social context in children’s self-attribution of social emotions. Social Development, 9:126-130, 2000.
BERGSON H: Las Dos Fuentes de la Moral y la Religión. Altaza. España, 1996.
BERTHOZ S, ARMONY JL, BLAIR RJ, DOLAN RJ: An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms. Brain, 125:1696-1708, 2002.
BLAIR RJ, MORRIS JS, FRITH CD, PERRETT DI, DOLAN RJ: Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain, 122(Pt 5):883-893, 1999.
BOTVINICK M, JHA AP, BYLSMA LM, FABIAN SA y cols.: Viewing facial expressions of pain engages cortical areas involved in the direct experience of pain. Neuroimage, 25:312-319, 2005.
BUCHANAN TW, TRANEL D, ADOLPHS R: Anteromedial temporal lobe damage blocks startle modulation by fear and disgust. Behav Neurosci, 118:429-437, 2004.
CARRUTHERS P: Suffering without subjectivity. Philosophical Studies, 121:99-125, 2004.
CASEBEER WD: Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nat Rev Neurosci, 4:840-846, 2003.
COULSON M: Attributing emotion to static body postures: Recognition accuracy, confusions, and viewpoint dependence. J Nonverbal Behavior, 28:117-139, 2004.
CRITCHLEY HD, MATHIAS CJ, DOLAN RJ: Neuroanatomical basis for first- and second-order representations of bodily states. Nat Neurosci, 4:207-212, 2001.
CRITCHLEY HD, ROTSHTEIN P, NAGAI Y, O’DOHERTY J y cols.: Activity in the human brain predicting differential heart rate responses to emotional facial expressions. Neuroimage, 24:751-762, 2005.
DAMASIO A: El Error de Descartes: La Razón de las Emociones. Andrés Bello. Santiago de Chile, 1996.
DAMASIO AR, GRABOWSKI TJ, BECHARA A, DAMASIO H.: Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nat Neurosci, 3:1049-1056, 2000.
DE QUERVAIN DJ, FISCHBACHER U, TREYER V, SCHELLHAMMER.: The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305:1254-1258, 2004.
EKMAN P: Facial expression and emotion. Am Psychol, 48:384-392, 1993.
FARROW TF, ZHENG Y, WILKINSON ID, SPENCE SA y cols.: Investigating the functional anatomy of empathy and forgiveness. Neuroreport, 12:2433-2438, 2001.
FRIDJA N: Passions: Emotion and socially consequental behavior. En: Kavanaugh R, Zimmerberg B, Fein S (eds). Emotion: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1-28, Nueva Jersey, 1996.
FU CH, WILLIAMS SC, CLEARE AJ, BRAMMER MJ: Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment: a prospective, eventrelated functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 61:877-889, 2004.
GOULD SJ: Pathways of discovery. Deconstructing the «science wars» by reconstructing an old mold. Science, 287:253- 255, 257-259, 261, 2000.
GREENE J, HAIDT J: How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn Sci, 6:517-523, 2002.
GREENE JD, NYSTROM LE, ENGELL AD, DARLEY JM, COHEN JD: The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44:389-400, 2004.
GREENE JD, SOMMERVILLE RB, NYSTROM LE, DARLEY JM, COHEN JD: An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293:2105-2108, 2001.
HABEL U, KLEIN M, KELLERMANN T, SHAH NJ, SCHNEIDER F: Same or different? Neural correlates of happy and sad mood in healthy males. Neuroimage, 26:206-214, 2005.
HAIDT J: The moral emotions. En: Davidson RJ, Scherer K, Goldsmith H (eds). Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford University Press, 852-870, Oxford, 2003.
HALE LR, GOLDSTEIN DS, ABRAMOWITZ CS, CALAMARI JE, KOSSON DS: Psychopathy is related to negative affectivity but not to anxiety sensitivity. Behav Res Ther, 42:697-710, 2004.
HAXBY JV, HOFFMAN EA, GOBBINI MI: The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci, 4:223-233, 2000.
KAGAN J: Human morality and temperament. Nebr Symp Motiv, 51:1-32, 2005.
KATZ LD: Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives. Imprent Academic. Thorventon, 2000.
KOSSON DS, SUCHY Y, MAYER AR, LIBBY J: Facial affect recognition in criminal psychopaths. Emotion, 2:398-411, 2002.
LANE RD, FINK GR, CHAU PM, DOLAN RJ: Neural activation during selective attention to subjective emotional responses. Neuroreport, 8:3969-3972, 1997.
LEVESQUE J, JOANETTE Y, MENSOUR B, BEAUDOIN G y cols.: Neural basis of emotional self-regulation in childhood. Neuroscience, 129:361-369, 2004.
LORBER MF: Psychophysiology of aggression, psychopathy, and conduct problems: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull, 130:531- 552, 2004.
MARKOWITSCH HJ, VANDEKERCKHOVEL MM, LANFERMANN H, RUSS MO: Engagement of lateral and medial prefrontal areas in the ecphory of sad and happy autobiographical memories. Cortex, 39:643-665, 2003.
MAYBERG HS, LIOTTI M, BRANNAN SK, MCGINNIS S y cols.: Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry, 156:675-682, 1999.
MESTON CM, HEIMAN JR, TRAPNELL PD, CARLIN AS: Ethnicity, desirable responding, and self-reports of abuse: A comparison of european- and Asian-ancestry undergraduates. J Consulting Clinical Psychology, 67:139-144, 1999.
MILNE E, GRAFMAN J: Ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions in humans eliminate implicit gender stereotyping. J Neurosci, 21:RC150, 2001.
MOLL J, DE OLIVEIRA-SOUZA R, BRAMATI IE, GRAFMAN J: Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage, 16:696-703, 2002.
MOLL J, DE OLIVEIRA-SOUZA R, ESLINGER PJ: Morals and the human brain: a working model. Neuroreport, 14:299- 305, 2003.
MOLL J, DE OLIVEIRA-SOUZA R, ESLINGER PJ, BRAMATI IE,: The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. J Neurosci, 22:2730-2736, 2002.
MOLL J, DE OLIVEIRA-SOUZA R, MOLL FT, IGNACIO FA y cols.: The moral affiliations of disgust: a functional MRI study. Cogn Behav Neurol, 18:68-78, 2005.
MONTEIRO J: Novos Estudos Humeanos. Imprensa Nacional- Casa da Moeda. Lisboa, 2003.
MORGAN D, GRANT KA, GAGE HD, MACH RH y cols.: Social dominance in monkeys: dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration. Nat Neurosci, 5:169-174, 2002.
NICHOLS S: Norms with feeling: towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84:221-236, 2002.
ORRISON W: Atlas of Brain Function. Thieme. Nueva York, 1995.
PHAN KL, MAGALHAES A, ZIEMLEWICZ TJ, FITZGERALD DA y cols.: Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. Acad Radiol, 12:164-172, 2005.
POSNER MI, SHEESE BE, ODLUDAS Y, TANG Y: Analyzing and shaping human attentional networks. Neural Networks, 19:1422-1429, 2006.
PREMACK D, WOODRUFF G: Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. Science, 202:532-535, 1978.
RICHELL RA, MITCHELL DGV, PESCHARDT KS, WINSTON JS y cols.: Trust and distrust: the perception of trustworthiness of faces in psychopathic and non-psychopathic offenders. Personality Individual Differences, 38:1735-1744, 2005.
ROLLS ET: Emotion Explained. Oxford University Press. Nueva York, 2005.
ROLLS ET, HORNAK J, WADE D, MCGRATH J: Emotion- related learning in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal lobe damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 57:1518-1524, 1994.
SINGER T, KIEBEL SJ, WINSTON JS, DOLAN RJ, FRITH CD: Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron, 41:653-662, 2004.
SINGER T, SEYMOUR B, O’DOHERTY JP, STEPHAN KE, DOLAN RJ, FRITH CD: Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439:466-469, 2006.
SMITH A: Teoría de los Sentimientos Morales. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México, 1941.
SPINOZA B: Ética Demostrada Según el Orden Geométrico. Porrúa. México, 1990.
STARK R, SCHIENLE A, GIROD C, WALTER B y cols.: Erotic and disgust-inducing pictures—differences in the hemodynamic responses of the brain. Biol Psychol, 70:19-29, 2005.
STERNGLANZ RW, DEPAULO BM: Reading nonverbal cues to emotions: The advantages and liabilities of relationship closeness. J Nonverbal Behavior, 28:245-266, 2004.
STÜRMER S, SNYDER M, OMOTO AM: Prosocial emotions and helping: the moderating role of group membership. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88:532-546, 2005.
TAKAHASHI H, YAHATA N, KOEDA M, MATSUDA T y cols.: Brain activation associated with evaluative processes of guilt and embarrassment: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 23:967- 974, 2004.
TAYLOR JG, FRAGOPANAGOS NF: The interaction of attention and emotion. Neural Netw, 18:353-369, 2005.
TILLEY J: Justifaying reasons, motivating reasons and agent relativism in ethics. Philosophical Studies, 1-27, 2004.
VERONA E, PATRICK CJ, CURTIN JJ, BRADLEY MM, LANG PJ: Psychopathy and physiological response to emotionally evocative sounds. J Abnorm Psychol, 113:99-108, 2004.
VOLAVKA J: The neurobiology of violence: an update. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 11:307-314, 1999.
Full text