medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Gastroenterología de México

Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2006; 71 (2)

Conocimiento de las indicaciones del ultrasonido endoscópico en un grupo de médicos de la Ciudad de México

Trujillo BOE, Peralta TNM, Guerrero HMM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 138-144
PDF size: 60.93 Kb.


Key words:

Endoscopic ultrasound, indications, guide lines.

ABSTRACT

Patients referred for endoscopic ultrasound (USE) are usually cared by gastroenterologists; however these patients are cared by other specialists too. Knowledge about EUS indications in our country is unknown. Aim: Assess knowledge of the indications for endoscopic ultrasound. Methods: A questionnaire designed to test knowledge of the indications for endoscopic ultrasound was applied. Questionnaire was developed by 6 experienced endosonographers. Questionnaire addresses the indications for endoscopic ultrasound. Questionnaire was translate to Spanish by the authors and was evaluated by an independent translator; it was applied to a pilot group of 20 physicians and was evaluated by the opinion of 2 Mexican endosonographers. Questionnaire was distributed to the attending physicians to one of the next meetings: Asociación Mexicana de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal and Hospital de Especialidades de la Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, La Raza del IMSS. We used Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskall Wallis and alpha Cronbach index to the statistical analysis. Results: Alfa Cronbach index 0.97 for questionnaire in Spanish. The survey was distributed to 205 physicians: 45 gastroenterologists, 39 general surgeons, 39 internists, and 44 other medical subspecialties. Of these 167 responded (81.4%). Only 28% of physicians had referred patients for an endoscopic ultrasound procedure. The mean total score for the entire group was 63.9%. Correct answers were higher in gastroduodenum system 78.5%. Knowledge of appropriate indications was highest among gastroenterologists 74% compared with surgeons 68.4%, other specialists 57.6% and internists 54.8% (p ‹ 0.007). Conclusions: Knowledge of the indications for endoscopio ultrasound is moderated.


REFERENCES

  1. DiMagno EP, Buxton JL, Regan PT, et al. Ultrasonic endoscope. Lancet 1980; I: 629-31.

  2. Strohm WD, Philip J, Hagenmuller F, Classen M. Ultrasonic tomography by means of an ultrasonic fiberendoscope. Endoscopy 1980; 12: 241-4.

  3. Heeren PAM, van Westreenen HL, Geersing GJ, et al. Influence of tumor characteristics on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in staging cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 966-71.

  4. Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Reed CE, et al. The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer, a single center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 714-19.

  5. Penman ID, Shen EF. EUS in advanced esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S2-S6.

  6. Canto MI. EUS fine-needle aspiration and early esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S66-S68.

  7. Fishbach W, Goebeler-Kolve ME, and Greiner A. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in the local staging of primary gastric lymphoma: results of a prospective, multicenter study comparing EUS with histopathologic stage. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 696-700.

  8. Yasuda K. EUS in the detection of early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S68-S75.

  9. Savides TJ, Master S. EUS in rectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S12-S18.

  10. Chak A. EUS in submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S43-S48.

  11. Kochman ML. EUS in pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S6-S12.

  12. Hunt GC, Faigel DO. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining respectability of pancreatic cancer: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 232-7.

  13. O’Toole D, Palazzo L, Hammel P, et al. Macrocystic pancreatic cystadenoma: The role of EUS and cyst fluid analysis in distinguishing mucinous and serous lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 823-9.

  14. Brugge W. Evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions with EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 39: 698-707.

  15. Song MH, Lee SK, Kim MH, et al. EUS in the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2003; 57: 891-6.

  16. Sedlack R, Affi A, Vazquez-Siqueiros E, et al. Utility of EUS in the evaluation of cystic pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): 543-47.

  17. Van Dam J. EUS in cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.)): S91-S93.

  18. Sahai AV. EUS in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S76-S81.

  19. Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A, et al. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis. A prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 507-11.

  20. Buscarini E, Tasini P, Vallisa D, Zambelli A, and Buscarini L. EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 510-18.

  21. Palazzo L, O’Toole D. EUS in common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S49-S57.

  22. Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan JKF, et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acute pancreatitis a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 325-30.

  23. Fritscher-Ravens A, Soehendra N, Schirrow L, et al. Role of transesophageal endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Chest 2000; 117: 339-45.

  24. Fickling W, Wallace MB. EUS in lung cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; Part 2. 56(4 Suppl.): S18-S21.

  25. Varadarajulu S, Schmulewitz N, Wildi S, et al. Accuracy of EUS in staging of T4 lung cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 345-8.

  26. Gunaratnam NT, Sarma AV, Norton ID, Wiersema MJ. A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 316-24.

  27. Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac plexus block. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 923-30.

  28. Byrne MF, Jowell PS. Gastrointestinal imaging: endoscopic ultrasound. Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 1631-48.

  29. Yusuf TE, Harewood GC, Clain JE, et al. Knowledge of indications for EUS among gastroenterologists and non-gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 575-9.

  30. Harewood GC, Yusuf TE, Clain JE, Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Rajan E. Assessment of the impact of an educational course on knowledge of appropriate EUS indications. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 554-9.

  31. Das A, Mourad W, Lightdale CJ, Sivak Jr. MV, Chak A. An international survey of the clinical practice of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 765-70.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2006;71