medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2001, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2001; 15 (1)

Evaluation of results in surgery of acetabular revison through the use of Ganz ring

Ponce de LDJG, Benítez GRA, Meza RGE

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 18-21
PDF size: 47.13 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Sixteen cases operated on of total hip replacement who had acetabular loosening after an average of 9.4 years, were treated by the application of Ganz acetabular supporting ring at revision surgery. There were 7 male and 9 female patients operated on from January to December 1997. In this retrospective, longitudinal, observational and descriptive trial, results according to the D’Aubigné scale of evaluation were good in 63% and fair in 37% for the acetabular reinforcement surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CHM, Bikart BC, et al: Ingrowth surfaces. Plasma spray coating to titanium alloy hip replacements. Clin Orthop 1994; 298: 37.

  2. Carter R, Vasu R, Harris H: Stress distribution in the acetabular regions. Effects of cement thickness and metal making of the total hip acetabular component. J Biomechanics 1982; 15(3): 165.

  3. Charnley J: Low friction principle, in low friction arthroplasty of the hip: Theory and practice. New York: Springer Verlag; 1979.

  4. Convery FR, Minteer-Convery M, Denive SE, et al: Acetabular revision with bipolar prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1990; 251: 100.

  5. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Lester SB, et al: Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; 243: 126.

  6. Harris WH, Crothers O, Oh Y: Total hip replacement and femoral head bone-grafting for several acetabular deficiency in adults. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59a: 752.

  7. Hozack WJ, Bicalho PS, Eng K: Treatment of femoral osteolysis with cementless total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 1996: 11: 668.

  8. Hooten JP Jr, Engh CA Jr, Engh C: Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76B: 419.

  9. Jacob HAC, Higgler AH, Dietsichi C: Mechanical function of subcondral bone as experimentally determined on a human pelvis. J Biomechanics 1976; 9: 625.

  10. Jerosh J, Steinbeck J, Stechmann J, et al: Influence of a high hip center on abductor muscle function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 385.

  11. John JF, Fisher PE: Radiographic determination of the anatomic hip joint center. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65(5): 509.

  12. Kavanaugh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fizgerald RH Jr: Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 72B: 63.

  13. Kwong LM, Jast M, Harris WH: High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstruction at 10 years. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 341.

  14. Lynne C, Jones MS, Hungerford IDS: Cement disease. Clin Orthop 1987; 225: 192.

  15. Nakata K, Ohzono K, Mashuhara K, et al: Acetabular osteolysis and migration in bipolar arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79B: 258.

  16. Pansky A, Tauber C: Acetabular supporting ring in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 233.

  17. Parosky WG, Magnus RE: Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop 1994; 298: 147.

  18. Stockl B, Beerkotte J, Krismer M, et al: Results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 55.

  19. Symeonides P, Petsatodes G, Pournaras J, et al: Replacement of deficient acetabulum using Burch Schneider cages. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; (suppl. 275) 68: 30.

  20. Wilson MG, Nikpoor N, Alibadi P, et al: The late acetabular allograft after bipolar revision arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71A: 1469.

  21. Zehntner MK, Ganz R: Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9(5): 469.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com