Soler-Limón KM, Rivera-González IR, Figueroa-Olea M, Sánchez-Pérez L, Sánchez-Pérez MC

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 273-287
PDF size: 173.16 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The family is the key to promote children’s development and learning. Several studies have found a relation between home environment characteristics and child development. However, these findings are not conclusive regarding which factors can promote or hinder child development. Objective: To identify the relation between home environment characteristics of families with low socioeconomic status and child development during the first 36 months of age.
Methods. Children during the first 36 months of age without perinatal risk from 293 families were included. The HOME inventory was used to measure the characteristics of child stimulation, and the Profile of Behaviors of the Development (PCD) to assess child development.
Results. Statistical differences were found for general coefficients performance according to home stimulation score as well as mean coefficients of language, cognition and social-emotional areas (P ‹0.05).
Conclusions. This investigation found a relation between home stimulation and child development, which showed to be more important after the first year of life.

REFERENCES

1. Atkín L. Analysis of instruments used in Latin America to measure psychosocial development in children from 0 to 6 years of age. The consultative group on Early Childhood Care an Development. México: Instituto Nacional de Perinatología; 1989.

2. UNICEF. Poverty and exclusion among urban children. Innocenti digest (10); 2003. [cited October 8, 2004]. Available from: //www.unicef-icdc.org.

3. Atkín L. Paso a paso. Como evaluar el crecimiento y desarrollo de los niños. México: UNICEF editorial Pax; 1987.

4. Belsky J. The determinants of parenting: a process model. Child Dev. 1984; 55: 83-96.

5. Bronfenbrenner U. La ecología del desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Editorial Paidos; 1987.

6. Dubow E, Luster T. Adjustment of children born to teenage mothers: the contribution of risk and protective factors. J Marriage Fam. 1990; 52: 393-404.

7. Seifer R, Sameroff A, Caldwin B. Child and family factors that ameliorate risk between 4 and 13 years of age. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992; 31: 893-903.

8. Kim-Cohen J, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A. Genetic and environmental processes in young children’s resilience and vulnerability to socioeconomic deprivation. Child Dev. 2004; 75: 651-8

9. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development [Development in societal context]. Ann Rev Psychol. 2002; 53: 371-99.

10. Pike A, Lervolino AC, Eley TC, Price TS, Plomin R. Environmental risk and young children’s cognitive and behavioral development. Int J Behav Dev. 2006; 30: 55-66.

11. Korenman-Humphrey S, Miller JE, Sjaastad-Humphrey JE. Long-term poverty and child development in the United States: Results from the NLSY. En: Institute for research on poverty discussion paper. p. 1044-94. [cited; Mayo 15, 2007]. Available from: http://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp104494.pdf

12. Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock, Arkansas: University of Arkasas; 1984.

13. Torralva TC, Manso M, Sauton F, Ferrero M, ODonnell A, Duran P, et al. Desarrollo mental y motor en los primeros años de vida: su relación con la estimulación ambiental y el nivel socio económico. Arch Argent Pediatr. 1999; 97: 306-16.

14. Bradley RH, Mundfrom DJ, Whiteside L, Casey PH, Barrett K. A factor analytic study of the infant-toddler and early childhood versions of the HOME Inventory administered to white, black, and Hispanic American parents of children born preterm. Child Dev. 1994; 65: 880-8.

15. Bradley RH. Children’s home environments, health, behavior, and intervention efforts: a review using the HOME inventory as a marker measure. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1993; 119: 437-90.

16. Bradley RH, Caldwell BM. The consistency of the home environment and its relation to child development. Int J Behav Dev. 1982; 5: 445-65.

17. Kolobe THA. Child rearing practices and developmental expectations for Mexican-American mothers and the developmental status of their infants. Phys Ther. 2004; 84: 439-56.

18. Duarte MMF, Soares DCJ, Saforcada ET, Días da Costa CM. Qualidade do ambiente e fatores asociados um estudo em crianças de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública Rio de Janeiro. 2004; 20: 710-8.

19. Bustos-Correa C, Herrera MO, Mahtiesen ME. Calidad del ambiente del hogar: inventario HOME -como un instrumento de medición-. Estudios Pedagógicos. 2001; 27: 7-22.

20. Elardo R, Bradley RH, Caldwell BM. The relation of infant’s home environments to mental test performance from 6 to 36 months: A longitudinal analysis. Child Dev. 1975; 46: 71-6.

21. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF, McAdoo HP, García-Coll C. The home environments of children in the United States. Part I: Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Dev. 2001; 72: 1844-67.

22. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF, Burchinal M, McAdoo HP, García-Coll C. The home environments of children in the United States. Part II: Relations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Dev. 2001; 72: 1868-86.

23. Bradley RH, Whiteside L, Mundfrom DJ, Casey PH, Kelleher KJ. Early indications of resilience and their relation to experiences in the home environments of low birth weight, premature children living in poverty. Child Dev. 1994; 65: 346-60.

24. Wachs TD, Uzgiris IC, Hunt JMV. Cognitive development in infants of different age levels and from different environmental backgrounds: an exploratory investigation. Merril Palmer Quarterly. 1971; 17: 283-317.

25. Bolaños MC. Perfil de Conductas del Desarrollo Revisado (PCD-R): un instrumento para la detección temprana de alteraciones y retrasos en el desarrollo. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, Instituto de Terapia Ocupacional, AC; 2005.

26. Bolaños MC, Márquez A, de la Riva M, Sánchez GCE, Gutiérrez GO, Elorza PH. Validez de correlación del perfil de conductas de desarrollo con la escala de desarrollo infantil Bayley II. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2006; 27: 190-9.

27. Aguilar-Martínez MC, Fernández-Guerrero X, Luna-Gutiérrez G, Ocampo-Bandera R, Torres-Olivo A, Gutiérrez-Castrellón P. Cédula socioeconómica comparada con estudio social. Análisis en el Instituto Nacional de Pediatría. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2001; 22: 118-21.

28. AMAI. Avances del Comité de Niveles Socioeconómicos. En: Comité de Niveles Socioeconómicos. México, D. F.: Asociación Mexicana de Agencias de Investigación de Mercados y Opinión Pública, AC; 2004. cited; Available from: http://www. amai.org/niveles.php

29. Uzgiris IC. Plasticidad y estructura. El papel de la experiencia en la infancia. En: Del Río N, editor. Experiencia y organización cerebral. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; 1993.

30. Klebanov PK, Brooks-Gunn J, McCarton C, McCormick M. The contribution of neighborhood and family income to Developmental Test Scores over the first three years of life. Child Dev. 1999; 69: 1420-36.

31. Johnson DL, Breckenridge JN, McGowan RJ. Home environment and early cognitive development in Mexican-American children. En: Gottfried AW, editor. Home en vironment and early cognitive development. Longitudinal research. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc; 1984.

32. Cravioto J. Nutrición, desarrollo mental, conducta y aprendizaje. México: DIF, OMS, Impresiones Modernas; 1985.

33. Cravioto J, DeLicardie ER. Desarrollo intersensorial en función de edad, estimulación y antecedentes de desnutrición de tercer grado. En: XLVII reunión AIP; 1978; México; 1978.

34. Vera-Noriega JA, Montiel CMM, Serrano QE, Velasco AFJ. Objetivos de la crianza, desarrollo, estimulación y sistemas de enseñanza. Psicol Salud. 1997; 10: 27-35.