medigraphic.com

2007, Number 2

Next >>

Vet Mex 2007; 38 (2)

Protein and energy digestibility in diets for piglets, supplemental with three diferente kinds of dried whey

Reis STC, Mariscal LG, Aguilera BA, Cervantes HJG

Language: English/Spanish
References: 43
Page: 141-151
PDF size: 225.64 Kb.


ABSTRACT

To measure the effect of kind of dried whey on nutrient digestibility, added to started diets, twelve piglets weaned at 17.7 days of age and weighing 6.8 kg were used. Piglets were fi tted with a simple T cannula at terminal ileum. Three diets were tested, one supplemented with neutralized dried whey (NDW), another with acid dried whey (ADW) and the third with sweet dried whey (SDW). Apparent ileal and total digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and energy (En) were measured in three periods (Pe): Pe1= days 27-29; Pe2= days 34-36 and Pe3= days 41-43. There were no differences (P › 0.05) among treatments in DM ileal digestibility (69.9% vs 71.9% vs 68.8% for NDW, ADW and SDW), CP ileal digestibility (71.2% vs 71% vs 68.3% for NDW, ADW and SDW) and En (67.9% vs 69.2% vs 67.3% for NDW, ADW and SDW). There was no period effect on nutrients ileal digestibility. Dry matter total digestibility was higher (P ‹ 0.05) in piglets fed with acid dried whey (83.2% vs 81.4% vs 81% for ADW, NDW and SDW). There were no differences (P › 0.05) among treatments for total digestibility of crude protein (78.7% vs 79.5% vs 77.6% for NDW, ADW and SDW) and energy (81.4% vs 82.6% vs 80.5% for NDW, ADW and SDW), but they showed a tendency (P ‹ 0.10) to increased from the fi rst to the second period. In conclusion, the different kinds of dry whey did not affect nutrient ileal digestibility, and they were well degraded and absorbed in upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The supplementation of acid dry whey in starter diets promoted a better utilization of dry matter in total GIT.


REFERENCES

  1. Touchette KJ, Carroll JA, Allee GL, Matteri RL, Dyer CJ, Beausang LA, et al. Effect of spray-dried plasma and lipopolysaccharide exposure on weaned pigs: I. Effects on the immune axis of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci 2002; 80:494-501.

  2. Cranwell PD. The development of acid and pepsin secretory capacity in the pig; the effects of age and weaning. 1. Studies in anaesthetized pigs. Br J Nutr 1985; 54: 305-320.

  3. Cervantes LJ. Nutrición y Alimentación del lechón. Memorias del XXXII Congreso Nacional de Veterinarios Especialistas en Cerdos; 1997 agosto 10-13; Ixtapa Zihuatanejo (Guerrero) México. México (DF): UNAM, 1997: 27-28.

  4. Nessmith WB, Nelssen JL, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Bergtröm JR, Dritz SS, et al. Evaluation of the interrelationships among lactose and protein sources in diets for segregated early-weaned pigs. J Anim Sci 1997; 75:3214-3221.

  5. Reis de Souza TC, Muñoz EH, Mariscal GL. Fuente y nivel de lactosa en dietas posdestete y el desarrollo productivo de lechones. Memorias del IX Congreso Nacional AMENA; 1999 octubre 28-30; Ixtapa Zihuatanejo (Guerrero) México. México (DF): AMENA, 1999: 1.

  6. Giensting DW, Easter RA, Roe BA. A comparison of protein and carbohydrate source of milk and plant origin for starter pigs. J Anim Sci 1985; 61 (Suppl 1): 299.

  7. Turlington WH, Allee GL, Nelssen JL. Effects of protein and carbohydrate sources on digestibility and digesta fl ow rate in weaned pigs fed a high-fat, dry diet. J Anim Sci 1989; 67:2333-2340.

  8. Reis de Souza TC, Mariscal-Landín G, Aguilera BA. Empleo de dos fuentes de lactosa en la dieta de lechones y sus efectos en el aparato digestivo. Téc Pecu Méx 2002; 40:299-308.

  9. Cole M, Sprent M. Protein and amino acid requirements of weaner pigs. In: Varley MA, Wiseman J, editors. The Weaner: Pig Nutrition and Management. New York: CABI Publishing, 2001: 45-63.

  10. Bylund G. Dairy Processing Handbook. Lund: Tetra Pak Systems AB, 1995.

  11. Reis de Souza TC, Mariscal LG. Preferencia alimenticia y comportamiento zootécnico en lechones alimentados con dietas formuladas con diferentes tipos de suero de leche deshidratado. Téc Pecu Méx 2004; 42:193-206.

  12. Diario Ofi cial de la Federación. Norma Oficial Mexicana- NOM-062-ZOO-1999, Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Diario Ofi cial de la Federación. México (DF) 2001.

  13. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. Washington (DC): National Academy Press, 1998.

  14. Baker DH. Ideal amino acid profi les for swine and poultry and their applications in feed formulation. Fermex Technical Rev 1997; 2:1-24.

  15. Reis de Souza TC, Mar BB, Mariscal LG. Digestibilidad ileal en cerdos canulados: desarrollo de una metodología. Téc Pecu Méx 2000; 32:143-150.

  16. Association of Offi cial Analytical Chemists. Offi cial Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington (DC): Association of Offi cial Analytical Chemists, 1990.

  17. Bateman JV. Nutrición Animal. Manual de métodos analíticos. México (DF): Herrera, Hermanos Sucesores SA, 1970.

  18. Fenton TW, Fenton M. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Can J Anim Sci 1979; 59:631-634.

  19. Reis de Souza TC, Mariscal LG, Uribe LL. Efecto de la fuente de grasa en el comportamiento zootécnico y la digestibilidad total e ileal de los nutrimentos en lechones destetados. Téc Pecu Méx 2001; 39:193-206.

  20. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 2nd ed. New York, US: McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1980.

  21. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Cary, North Caroline: SAS Institute Inc, 1988.

  22. Kelly D, King TP. Digestive physiology and development in pigs. In: Varley MA, Wiseman J, editors. The Weaner Pig: Nutrition and Management. New York: CABI Publishing, 2001:179-206.

  23. Maxwell CV Jr, Carter SD. Feeding the Weaned Pig. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine Nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000:691-715.

  24. Aguilera BA, Souza RTC, Mariscal LG, Juárez GY. Desarrollo de los órganos digestivos hasta la cuarta semana posdestete en lechones alimentados con subproductos lácteos. Memorias del XI Congreso de la AMENA y I del CLANA; 2003 agosto 18-23; Cancún (Quintana Roo) México. México (DF): AMENA, 2003: 335-336.

  25. Kidder DE, Manners MJ. Digestion in the Pig. Bristol: Scientechnica, 1978.

  26. Mariscal-Landin G, Avellaneda JH, Reis de Souza TC, Aguilera A, Borbolla GA, Mar B. Effect of tannins in sorghum on amino acid ileal digestibility and trypsin (E.C.2.4.21.4) and chymotrypsin (E.C.2.4.21.1) activity of growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci and Technol 2004; 117:245-264.

  27. Salgado P, Freire JPB, Mourato M, Cabral F, Toullec R, Lallès JP. Comparative effects of different legume protein sources in weaned piglets: nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology and digestive enzymes. Livest Prod Sci 2002; 74:191-202.

  28. Lizardo R. Exploration de l´adaptation de la capacité digestive du porcelet après le sevrage: effet des facteurs antinutrionnels et des polysaccharides non amylacés sur l´activité des enzymes, la digestibilité et les performances zootechniques [Thèse de doctorat.] Rennes, France: L´Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Rennes; 1997.

  29. Sohn KS, Maxwell CV, Southern LL, Buchanan DS. Improved soybean protein sources for early-weaned pigs: II. Effects on ileal amino acid digestibility. J Anim Sci 1994; 72:631-637.

  30. Caine WR, Sauer WC, Tamminga S, Verstegen MWA, Schultze H. Apparent ileal digestibilities of amino acids in newly weaned pigs fed diets with protease-treated soybean meal. J Anim Sci 1997; 75: 2962-2969.

  31. Reis de Souza TC, Mariscal-Landín G. El destete, la función digestiva y la digestibilidad de los alimentos en cerdos jóvenes. Téc Pecu Méx 1997; 35:145-159.

  32. Cho SB, Kim JH, Moon HK, Chae BJ, Cho WT. Apparent digestibility of amino acids, energy and proximate nutrients in dietary protein sources for young pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 1997; 10:63-651.

  33. Leibbrandt VD, Benevenga NJ. Utilization of liquid whey in feeding swine. In: Miller ER, Ullrey DE, Lewis AJ, editors. Swine Nutrition. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991:559-571.

  34. Kim KI, Jewell DE, Benevenga NJ, Grummer RH. The fraction of dietary lactose available for fermentation in the cecum and colon of pigs. J Anim Sci 1978; 46:1658-1665.

  35. Kim KI, Benevenga NJ, Grummer RH. Lactase activity and VFA production in the cecum and colon of pigs fed a corn-soy or 40% whey diet. J Anim Sci 1978; 46:1648-1657.

  36. Hansen JA, Nelssen JL, Goodband RD, Weeden TL. Evaluation of animal protein supplements in diets of early-weaned pigs. J Anim Sci 1993; 71:1853-1862.

  37. Aguilera MAB. Utilización de diferentes fuentes de proteína en la alimentación de lechones al destete. (Tesis de maestría.) México (DF): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2001.

  38. Reis STC, Mariscal LG, Aguilera BA. Efecto de diferentes cereales en dietas de iniciación para lechones sobre la digestibilidad de los nutrimentos y la preferencia alimenticia. Vet Méx 2005; 36:11-24.

  39. Caine WR, Tamminga S, Sauer WC, Verstegen MWA, Schulze H. Bacterial contributions to total and endogenous recoveries of nitrogen and amino acids in ileal digesta of newly weaned piglets fed protease-treated soybean meal. Livest Prod Sci 1999; 57:147-157.

  40. Cera KR, Mahan DC, Reinhart A. Effects of dietary dried whey and corn oil on weanling pig performance, fat digestibility and nitrogen utilization. J Anim Sci 1988;66:1438-1445.

  41. Cera KR, Mahan DC, Reinhart A. Weekly digestibilities of diets supplemented with corn oil, lard or tallow by weanling swine. J Anim Sci 1988; 66:1430-1437.

  42. Cera K R, Mahan D C, Reinhart A. Apparent fat digestibilities and performance responses of postweaning swine fed diets supplemented with coconut oil, corn oil or tallow. J Anim Sci 1989; 67: 2040-2047.

  43. Tokach MD, Nelseen JL, Allee GL. Effect of protein and (or) carbohydrate fractions of dried whey on performance and nutrients digestibility of early weaned pigs. J Anim Sci 1989; 67:1307-1312.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com