medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)

2003, Number 3

<< Back

Cir Plast 2003; 13 (3)

Experimental and clinical microsurgical training for plastic surgery residents

Chávez-Abraham V, Hadad-Tame JL, Vecchyo CC,Sastré-Ortiz N

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 128-132
PDF size: 60.10 Kb.


ABSTRACT

We present the guidelines to be followed for selecting patients that are going to be submitted to a microsurgical procedure, including the basis of the microsurgical procedures in the experimental surgical laboratory and the necessary guidelines for an adequate clinical training of optimal pre, intra and postoperative microvascular clinical procedures, which range from the performance of diagnostic tests, preoperative preparation, intraoperative hemodynamic management, control and postoperative pharmacological support to the final assessment of such procedure. Importance and need of a strict and intensive training in order to be able to perform a clean surgical technique in the management of small structures with less tissue injury. Microsurgical techniques today are no longer considered a sporadic procedure but a common option that offer a shorter hospitalization period, early mobilization of the patient and a decrease in the number of surgical procedures required. Therefore adequate clinical and experimental training is indispensable and compulsory for plastic surgery residents.


REFERENCES

  1. Harri K. Microvascular surgery and its clinical applications. In Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. P.P 1-17. Kokuseido Publishing Co., Ltd. Tokyo 1977.

  2. Jacobson JH, Suarez EL. Microsurgery in anastomoses of small vessels. Surg Forum 1960; 11: 243-246.

  3. Buncke HJ, Shulz WP, Buncke CM. Immediate Nicoladoni procedure in the rhesus monkey, or hallux to hand transplantation utilizing microminiature vascular anastomoses. Br J Plast Surg 1966; 19: 332.

  4. Krizek TJ. Experimental transplantation of composite grafts microsurgical vascular anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 538-541.

  5. Chávez-Abraham V, Haddad, JL, Sastre N. Sistematización del manejo pre, trans y posoperatorio de pacientes microquirúrgicos. Cir Plast 1995; 5: 37-40.

  6. Shestak KC. Expanding the horizons in treatment of severe peripheral vascular disease using microsurgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85: 406-411.

  7. Bonawitz SC. Free tissue transfer in elderly patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 1074-1079.

  8. Siemionow M. Evaluation of different microsurgical techniques for arterial anastomosis vessels of diameter less than one millimeter. J Reconstr Microsurg 1987; 3: 333-340.

  9. Buncke HJ. Microsurgery: Transplantation-Replantation. An Atlas-Text. Chicago: Lea & Febiger. 1991.

  10. Habal SM. Training in microvascular surgery. Surgery 1977; 81: 596-598.

  11. O’Brien B Mc. Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery. Churchill Livingstone. New York, USA. 1977.

  12. Colen L, Musson A. Preoperative assessment of the peripheral vascular disease patient for free tissue transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg 1987; 1: 4-9.

  13. Schwartz S. Hemostasis, surgical bleeding and transfusion. In: Schwartz S, Shires T, Spencer FC: Principles of Surgery. New York, McGraw Hill Ed. 1989.

  14. Acaland RD. Thrombus formation in microvascular surgery: An experimental study of the effects of surgical trauma. Surgery 1973; 73: 766-771.

  15. Erdi A, Thomas EP, Kakkar VV, Lane DA. Effect low dose subcutaneous heparine in whole blood viscosity. Lancet 1976; 2(7981): 342-344.

  16. Padilla L, Valle A. Manual de Microcirugía. Salvat Mexicana Ed. P.p 7-37. Mexico, City. 1983

  17. Acland RD. Microsurgery practice manual. San Louis Missouri, USA. Mosby By Co. 1980.

  18. Serafin D, Georgiade NG. A laboratory manual of microsurgery. North Carolina, USA. Durham University. 4TH Ed. 1983.

  19. Reagan DS, Grundberg AB, George MJ. Clinical evaluation and temperature monitoring in predicting viability in replantations. J Reconstr Microsurg 1994; 1: 10-16.

  20. Silverman DG, LaRossa DD, Barlow CH. Quantification of tissue fluorescein delivery and prediction of flap viability with the fiberoptic dermofluorometer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66: 545-561.

  21. Graham BH, Walton RL, Elings BV. Surface quantification of injected fluorescein as a predictor of flap viability. Plast reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 829-829.

  22. Adams SL. The medicinal leech. Ann Int Med 1988; 109: 309-311.

  23. Debb RB, Malone JM, Leverett LC. The use of medicinal leeches in the salvage of flaps with venous congestion. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 29: 250-252.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com