medigraphic.com

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2024; 27 (3)

Intervention in mexican patients with diabetes mellitus based on contingent behavior analysis

Mora-Romo JF, Bazán RGE, Torres VLE, Ybarra-Sagarduy JL

Language: Spanish
References: 49
Page: 1175-1198
PDF size: 414.76 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background/Objectives: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease whose death rate has steadily increased in the last 15 years in Mexico. The disease control depends on the performance of self-care behaviors, where Treatment Adherence (TA) will be central to preserve Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to design and evaluate an intervention based on Contingency Behavior Analysis to improve TA and HRQoL in people with newly diagnosed T2DM. Methods: A preexperimental study was conducted with 29 people with T2DM through a three-stage intervention: Alteration of dispositions, Alteration of behavior and Alteration of others' behaviors. Results: There was a significant decrease in postprandial glucose levels, as well as an overall improvement in Treatment Adherence and HRQoL, where 17 participants decreased their postprandial glucose levels, 16 increased their TA and 19 improved their perceived HRQoL. Conclusions: The deprofessionalizing perspective of the intervention allowed to achieve the objectives by promoting the active participation of the participants in their self-care, considering their daily interactions to implement the strategies suggested during the intervention.


REFERENCES

  1. Almutairi, N., Hosseinzadeh, H. y Gopaldasani, V. (2020). The effectiveness ofpatient activation intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus glycemic control andself-management behaviors: A systematic review of RCTs. Primary CareDiabetes, 14(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.009.

  2. Alva, S., Bailey, T., Brazg, R., Budiman, E. S., Castorino, K., Christiansen, M. P.,Forlenza, G., Kipnes, M., Liljenquist, D. R., y Liu, H. (2022). Accuracy of a 14-Day Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System WithAdvanced Algorithm in Pediatric and Adult Population With Diabetes. Journalof diabetes science and technology, 16(1), 70–77.https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296820958754.

  3. Asociación Americana de Diabetes. (2021). Classification and diagnosis ofdiabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care, 44(1),S15-S33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S002.

  4. Asociación Americana de Psicología. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologistsand code conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf.

  5. Asociación Latinoamericana de Diabetes. (2019). Guías ALAD sobre eldiagnóstico, control y tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 con medicinabasada en evidencia edición 2019.https://www.revistaalad.com/guias/5600AX191_guias_alad_2019.pdf.

  6. Asociación Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM –Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos.https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-ammprincipios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/.

  7. Bhaskaran, K., y Smeeth, L. (2014). What is the difference between missingcompletely at random and missing at random? International Journal ofEpidemiology, 43(4), 1336–1339. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu080.

  8. Fall, E., Roche, B., Izaute, M., Batisse, M., Tauveron, I. y Chakroun, N. (2013). Abrief psychological intervention to improve adherence in type 2 diabetes.Diabetes y Metabolism, 39, 432-438.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2013.05.003.

  9. Fernández-Lázaro, C., García-González, J., Adams, D., Fernandez-Lazaro, D.,Mielgo-Ayuso, J., Caballero-García, A., Moreno Racionero, F., Córdova, A. yMiron-Canelo, J. (2019). Adherence to treatment and related factors amongpatients with chronic conditions in primary care: a cross-sectional study. BMCFamily Practice, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1019-3.

  10. Fritz, C., Morris, P. y Richler, J. (2012). Effect size estimates: current use,calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338.

  11. George, D. y Mallery, P. (2022). IBM SPSS statistics 27 step by step: A simpleguide and reference (Seventeenth edition). Routledge.

  12. Gonder-Frederick, L., Shepard, J., Grabman, J. y Ritterband, L. (2016).Psychology, technology, and diabetes management. The AmericanPsychologist, 71(7), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040383.

  13. Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, M. (2014). Metodología de lainvestigación. McGraw Hill.

  14. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. (2009). Programa institucional de prevencióny atención al paciente diabético: DIABETIMSS.https://segundoepifesz.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/programa-de-educacionen-diabetes-diabetimss.pdf.

  15. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. (2017). Guía de dinámicas de estrategiaseducativas de promoción de la salud. Coordinación de Comunicación Socialdel Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. (No publicado).

  16. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2022). Estadísticas de defuncionesregistradas 2021.https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2022/EDR/EDR2021_10.pdf.

  17. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. (2003). Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000.Tomo 2: La salud de los adultos.https://ensanut.insp.mx/encuestas/ensa2000/doctos/informes/ENSA_tomo2.pdf.

  18. Karimi, M. y Brazier, J. (2016). Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Qualityof Life: What is the Difference? PharmacoEconomics, 34(7), 645–649.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9.

  19. Khayyat, S., Mohamed, M., Khayyat, S., Hyat Alhazmi, R., Korani, M., Allugmani,E., Saleh, S., Mansouri, D., Lamfon, Q., Beshiri, O. y Abdul, M. (2019).Association between medication adherence and quality of life of patients withdiabetes and hypertension attending primary care clinics: a cross-sectionalsurvey. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of LifeAspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 28(4), 1053–1061.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2060-8.

  20. Lee, J. y Huber, J. (2021). Evaluation of Multiple Imputation with Large Proportionsof Missing Data: How Much Is Too Much? Iranian Journal of Public Health,50(7), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i7.6626.

  21. López-Carmona, J. y Rodríguez-Moctezuma, R. (2006). Adaptación y validacióndel instrumento de calidad de vida Diabetes 29 en pacientes mexicanos condiabetes mellitus tipo 2. Salud Pública de México, 48(3), 200-211.https://saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/6689/8329.

  22. Madley-Dowd, P., Hughes, R., Tilling, K. y Heron, J. (2019). The proportion ofmissing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 110, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.016.

  23. Markle-Reid, M., Ploeg, J., Fraser, K., Fisher, K., Bartholomew, A., Griffith, L.,Miklavcic, J., Gafni, A., Thabane, L. y Upshur, R. (2018). Community ProgramImproves Quality of Life and Self-Management in Older Adults with DiabetesMellitus and Comorbidity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(2),263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15173.

  24. Martínez-Munguía, C., Quintana-Rodríguez, C. y Ortiz-Rueda, G. (2014). Género yconductas de riesgo para la salud: una aproximación desde un punto de vistainterconductual. Journal of Behavior, Health y Social Issues, 6(2), 57-69.https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20070780.2014.6.2.48592.

  25. Mora-Romo, J. (2022). Adherencia al tratamiento en personas con diabetesmellitus tipo 2 en México: Estudio de meta-análisis. Psicumex, 12, 1-26.https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v12i1.493.

  26. Mora-Romo, J., Bazán-Riverón, G., Torres-Velázquez, L., Ybarra-Sagarduy, J.(2023). Efecto de intervenciones psicológicas en el control glucémico enMéxico: Estudio de meta-análisis. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala,26(2), 445-466. https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/repi/article/view/86029.

  27. Morris, S. y DeShon, R. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysiswith repeated measures and independent-groups designs. PsychologicalMethods, 7(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105.

  28. Organización Mundial de la Salud. (1998). Programme on mental health:WHOQOL user manual. World Health Organization.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77932/WHO_HIS_HSI_Rev.2012.03_eng.pdf?sequence=1yisAllowed=y.

  29. Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies:Evidence for action.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42682/9241545992.pdf?sequence=1yisAllowed=y.

  30. Pamugkas, R., Chamroonsawasdi, K. y Vatanasomboon, P. (2017). A SystematicReview: Family Support Integrated with Diabetes Self-Management amongUncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Behavioral Sciencie, 7(3), 1-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fbs7030062.

  31. Pérez-Jover, V., Sala-González, M., Guilabert, M. y Mira, J. (2019). Mobile Appsfor Increasing Treatment Adherence: Systematic Review. Journal of MedicalInternet Research, 21(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2196/12505.

  32. Poblano-Verástegui, O., Vieyra-Romero, W., Galván-García, A., Fernández-Elorriaga, M., Rodríguez-Martínez, A. y Saturno-Hernández, P. (2017). Calidady cumplimiento de guías de práctica clínica de enfermedades crónicas notransmisibles en el primer nivel. Salud Pública de México, 59(2), 1-11.https://doi.org/10.21149/8285.

  33. Reis, A., Cunha, M., Bianchin, M., Freitas, M. y Castiglioni, L. (2019). Comparisonof quality of life and functionality in type 2 diabetics with and without insulin.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 65(12), 1464–1469.https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.65.12.1464.

  34. Ribes, E. (1982). El conductismo: reflexiones críticas. Editorial Fontanella.

  35. Ribes, E. (2008). Psicología y Salud: Un análisis conceptual. Trillas.

  36. Ribes-Iñesta, E. (2015). Causas no causales y campos no son entidades:Respuesta a Telmo Peña. Acta Comportamentalia, 23(1), 65-71.http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/acom/article/view/49610/44636.

  37. Rodríguez, M. (2002). Análisis contingencial: Un sistema psicológicointerconductual para el campo aplicado. FES Iztacala.

  38. Secretaría de Salud. (2015). Prevención y control de la Diabetes Mellitus 2013-2018: Programa sectorial de salud.https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/37607/PAE_PrevencionControlDiabetesMellitus2013_2018.pdf.

  39. Secretaría de Salud. (2017). Intervenciones de enfermería para la prevención y elcontrol de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 del paciente pediátrico en primer nivel deatención: Evidencias y recomendaciones. http://www.cenetecdifusion.com/CMGPC/SS-802-17/ER.pdf.

  40. Secretaría de Salud. (2020). Intervenciones de APS-I Mx en los distritos de salud.http://sidss.salud.gob.mx/site2/docs/Intervenciones_de_APSI_Mx_en_DS.pdf.

  41. Shamah-Levy, T., Romero-Martínez. M., Barrientos-Gutiérrez, T., Cuevas-Nasu,L., Bautista-ArreEdondo, S., Colchero, M., Gaona-Pineda, E., Lazcano-Ponce,E., Martínez-Barnetche, J., Alpuche-Arana, C. y Rivera-Dommarco, J. (2021).Encuesta nacional de salud y nutrición 2021 sobre covid-19: Resultadosnacionales.https://ensanut.insp.mx/encuestas/ensanutcontinua2021/doctos/informes/220804_Ensa21_digital_4ago.pdf.

  42. Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2013). Código ético del psicólogo. Trillas.

  43. Soria, R., Vega, C. y Nava, C. (2009). Escala de adherencia terapéutica parapacientes con enfermedades crónicas, basada en comportamientosexplícitos. Alternativas en Psicología, 14(20), 78-88.http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1405-339X2009000100008ylng=ptynrm=iytlng=es.

  44. Speight, J., Holmes-Truscott, E., Hendrieckx, C., Skovlund, S. y Cooke, D. (2019).Assessing the impact of diabetes on quality of life: what have the past 25years taught us? Diabetic Medicine, 37(3), 483-492.https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14196.

  45. Tabesh, M., Shaw, J., Zimmet, P., Söderberg, S., Koye, D., Kowlessur, S., Timol,M., Joonas, N., Sorefan, A., Gayan, P., Alberti, K., Toumilehto, J. y Magliano,D. (2018). Association between type 2 diabetes mellitus and disability: what isthe contribution of diabetes risk factors and diabetes complications? Journalof Diabetes, 10(9), 744-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12659.

  46. Talento, M. y Ribes, E. (1980). Consideraciones sobre el papel social de laprofesión psicológica. En E. Ribes, C. Fernández, M. Rueda, M. Talento y F.López (eds.), Enseñanza, ejercicio e investigación de la psicología: Unmodelo integral (pp. 325-339). Trillas.

  47. Thomsen, S., Westergaard, G., Herløv y Agergaard, S. (2021). Maintainingchanges in physical activity among type 2 diabetics – A systematic review ofrehabilitation interventions. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine y Science inSports, 31(8), 1582-1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13951

  48. Ventura-León, J. (2022). De regreso a la validez basada en el contenido.Adicciones, 34(4), 323-326. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1213.

  49. Yatani, K. (2016). Effect sizes and power analysis in HCI. En J. Robertson y M.Kaptein, (eds). Modern statistical methods for HCI, (87-110). Springer.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com