2025, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2025; 48 (2)
Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine in postoperative analgesia in hysterectomized patients
Morelo-Lora UÁ, Armas-Pedrosa G, Paz-Estrada C, Pías-Solís S
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 76-79
PDF size: 375.79 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: to evaluate the analgesic quality of intrathecal morphine at different postoperative doses.
Material and methods: a sample of 50 hysterectomy patients divided into two double-blind groups was used, using bupivacaine at 0.5% 10 mg plus morphine, at two different doses of 0.3 and 0.5 mg, where the predominant age of the patients was more than 40 years, a classification of the functional status of group II ASA, the presence of co-morbidities mainly hypertension in a high number of patients although compensated.
Results: the adverse effects found were nausea, vomiting and light pruritus; which predominated in group II. However, the patients in this group showed better pain quality, less use of analgesia for rescue in the postoperative period and a higher degree of satisfaction, so the dose used in them was the most effective.
Conclusions: the results of this research allow the use of intrathecal morphine as an anesthetic method in hysterectomies to control postoperative pain at the indicated doses.
REFERENCES
Primavesi AB. Morfina peridural: analgésico pós-operatório. Braz J Anesthesiol. 1986;36:299-302.
Fascio MN, Pinto MC. Injeção peridural de morfina no tratamento da dor. Braz J Anesthesiol. 1980;30:255-256.
Nocite JR, Cagnolati CA, Nunes AM, Souza LR. Morfina peridural no controle da dor pós-operatória. Braz J Anesthesiol.1982;32:57-64.
Nocite JR, Nuñez AM, Carvalho G, Oliveira DJ. Bloqueo subaracnoideo con bupivacaína pesada a 0,5%: efeito da adição de morfina à solução. Braz J Anesthesiol. 1985;35:S23-S29.
Moen M. Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43:431-440.
Rahman R, Gupta S, Manyonda I. Hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2017;27:125-131.
Pynna K, Vuorela P, Lodenius L, Paavonen J, Roine RP, Rasanen P. Cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:225-232.
García-Montes JM, Lizcano-Contreras CT, Torres M, Álvarez-Hernández LF, Martínez-Sánchez LM, Vallejo-Agudelo E. Efectividad analgésica de clonidina vs. morfina como coadyuvantes de la anestesia espinal con bupivacaína hiperbárica en pacientes sometidas a cesárea. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2018;25:207-213.
Herrera Gómez PJ, Garzón JF. Opiáceos intratecales y depresión respiratoria ¿Un mito en obstetricia? Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2015;43:101-103.
Osorio-Gutiérrez CI, Ortiz-Gómez GA, Valencia-Ríosa JF, Arango-Gómez FA. Comparación de mezcla de opioides subaracnoideos para cesárea. Estudio observacional. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2021;49:e940.
Blanton E, Lamvu G, Patanwala I, Barron KI, Witzeman K, Tu FF, et al. Non-opioid pain management in benign minimally invasive hysterectomy: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:557-567.
Romero VK, Cazull II, González LL. Evaluación económica del tratamiento antimicrobiano en pacientes histerectomizadas por fibroma uterino. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2015;80:434-441.