medigraphic.com
ISSN 0210-5187 (Electronic)

2007, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2007; 35 (2)

Searching for the best evidence in dermatology

Manríquez MJJ, Silva VS, Masbun ZT

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 65-66
PDF size: 376.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In the lad few years main changes have taken place in the way that biomedical information is developed and spread. The credibility and importance gwer to evidence based medicine, after a decade of its introduction in the medical task, have made available lost of sources of high quality information. In this paper we review these sources of information, emphasizing those most relevant for the dermatology price.


REFERENCES

  1. Dill SW, Digiovanna JJ. Changing paradigms in dermatology: information technology. Clin Dermatol 2003;21:375-82.

  2. Gjersvik PJ, Nylenna M, Aasland OG. Use of the Internet among dermatologists in the United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway. Dermatol Online J 2002;8:1.

  3. 3.Pollock B, Goulden V, Sheehan-Dare R, Goodfield M. Dermatology and the World Wide Web. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:914-5.

  4. 4.Wainwright BD. Clinically relevant dermatology resources and the Internet: an introductory guide for practicing physicians. Dermatol Online J 1999;5:8.

  5. 5.Sitaru C. Dermatology resources on the Internet: a practical guide for dermatologists. Int J Dermatol 1998;37:641-7.

  6. Diepgen TL, Eysenbach G. Digital images in dermatology and the Dermatology Online Atlas on the World Wide Web. J Dermatol 1998;25:782-7.

  7. 7.Macey WH. Dermatology and the World Wide Web. Dermatol Nurs 1997;9:159-62.

  8. 8.Krejci-Papa NC, Bittorf A, Diepgen T, Huntley A. Dermatology on the Internet. A source of clinical and scientific information. J Dermatol Sci 1996;13:1-4.

  9. 9.Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D, Smith R. Evidence based medicine. BMJ 1995;310:1085-6.

  10. 10.Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care. BMJ 2001;323:101-105.

  11. 11.Olsen O, Middleton P, Ezzo J, Gotzsche PC, Hadhazy V, Herxheimer A, et al. Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998. BMJ 2001;13;323:829-32.

  12. 12.Bigby M. Evidence-based medicine in a nutshell. A guide to finding and using the best evidence in caring for patients. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1609-18.

  13. 13.Bigby M. Evidence-based medicine in dermatology. Dermatol Clin 2000;18:261-76.

  14. 14.Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999 20;318:527-30.

  15. DiBenedetto DV. Using the National Guideline Clearinghouse. AAOHN J 2002;50:109-10.

  16. Wyer PC. The critically appraised topic: closing the evidence-transfer gap. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:639-40.

  17. 17.Dong P, Mondry A. Enhanced quality and quantity of retrieval of Critically Appraised Topics using the CAT Crawler. Med Inform Internet Med 2004;29:43-55.

  18. 18.Haynes RB, Wilczynski N. Finding the gold in MEDLINE: clinical queries. ACP J Club 2005;142:A8-9.

  19. 19.Grindlay D, Boulos MN, Williams HC. Introducing the National Library for Health Skin Conditions Specialist Library. BMC Dermatol 2005;26:5:4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com