2024, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Arch Med Urg Mex 2024; 16 (2)
Comprehensive approach in emergency care: initial management of preeclampsia for quality attention
Hernández-López GD, Escobar-Ortiz D, Trejo-Rosas S, Gororodo-Delsol LA
Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page: 117-125
PDF size: 226.93 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Preeclampsia, a hypertensive disorder that develops during pregnancy, accounts for 2% to 8% of pregnancy-related complications worldwide,
resulting in over 50,000 maternal deaths and more than 500,000 fetal deaths. This progressive multisystem disorder is characterized by the
sudden onset of hypertension and proteinuria, or hypertension with significant dysfunction of target organs, with or without proteinuria, usually
occurring after 20 weeks of gestation or postpartum. The pathogenesis of preeclampsia involves both placental abnormalities and systemic
vascular dysfunction in the mother. The majority of cases occur in the late preterm or term period, with favorable maternal, fetal, and neonatal
outcomes. However, there is a risk of severe morbidity and mortality for both the mother and the fetus. Early-onset cases, representing approximately
10% of cases, are associated with higher risks of severe complications due to preterm birth. Risk factors such as nulliparity, overweight/
obesity, previous preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, multiple pregnancies, chronic kidney disease, or pregestational diabetes increase the
likelihood of developing preeclampsia. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial in preventing severe complications. This review examines the
clinical presentation, complications, and management of preeclampsia, as well as the crucial role of the interprofessional team in improving care
for patients with this condition.
REFERENCES
Rana S., Lemoine E., Granger J. P., Karumanchi S. A. Preeclampsia:Pathophysiology, Challenges, and Perspectives. Circ Res. 2019; 24 (7): 1094-1112.
Tunçalp Ӧ., Pena-Rosas J. P., Lawrie T., et al. WHO recommendationson antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience–goingbe-yond survival. BJOG. 2017; 124:860- 862.
Pettker C. M., Grobman W. A. Obstetric Safety and Quality.Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126 (1): 196-206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000918. PMID: 26241273.
Salazar Marzal, Ego. El problema de la seguridad de la atenciónobstétrica. Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, 2019;65 (1): 31-36.
Brenes-Monge, Alexander, Yáñez-Álvarez, Iraís, Meneses-León,Joacim, Poblano-Verástegui, Ofelia, Vértiz-Ramírez, José de Jesús,& Saturno-Hernández, Pedro Jesús. Aproximación a la calidadde la atención durante el embarazo, parto y posparto en mujerescon factores de riesgo obstétrico en México. Salud Públicade México 2020; 62 (6): 798-809.
Velumania V., Durán C. C., Hernández G. L. S. Preeclampsia: unamirada a una enfermedad mortal. Rev Fac Med UNAM. 2021; 64(5): 7-18.
Santa Cruz-Pavlovich F. J., Salmeron-Salcedo C. A., Ponce-RiveraM. S., et al. Preeclampsia: revisión. Rev Homeostasis. 2023;5(1).
Hernández-López G. D., Deloya-Tomas E., Martínez-MazariegosJ. J., et al. Preeclampsia posparto. Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2012; 79(3): 174-178.
Phipps E., Prasanna D., Brima W., Jim B. Preeclampsia: updatesin pathogenesis, definitions, and guidelines. Clin J Am SocNephrol. 2016; 11: 1102–13.
Atallah A., Lecarpentier E., Goffinet F., Doret-Dion M., GaucherandP., Tsatsaris V. Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia. Drugs.2017; 77(17): 1819-1831. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0823-0.
Khalil G., Hameed A. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology and the Maternal-Fetal Risk. J Hypertens Manag. 2017; 3: 024.
Weissgerber T. L., Garcia-Valencia O., Milic N. M., Codsi E., CubroH., et al. Early Onset Preeclampsia Is Associated With GlycocalyxDegradation and Reduced Microvascular Perfusion. J Am HeartAssoc. 2019; 8 (4): e010647.
Staff A. C., Fjeldstad H. E., Fosheim I. K., Moe K., Turowski G. , etal. Failure of physiological transformation and spiral artery atherosis:their roles in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226(2S): S895-S906.
Arora V., Tyagi A., Ramanujam M., Luthra A. Intraabdominal pressurein non-laboring preeclamptic vs normotensive patients undergoingcesarean section: A prospective observational study. ActaObstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99: 1031- 1038.
Rola P., Miralles-Aguiar F., Argaiz E., Beaubien-Souligny W., HaycockK., Karimov T., et al. Clinical applications of the venousexcess ultrasound (VExUS) score: conceptual review and caseseries. Ultrasound J. 2021; 13(1): 32.
Zieleskiewicz L., Contargyris C., Brun C, Touret M., Vellin A., AntoniniF. Lung ultrasound predicts interstitial syndrome and hemodynamicprofile in parturients with severe preeclampsia. Anesthesiology.2014; 120: 906–14.
Bajwa S. J. S., Kurdi M. S., Sutagatti J. G., Bajwa S. K., TheerthK. A. Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the assessmentof volume status and fluid management in patients with severepre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian JAnaesth. 2021; 65 (10): 716-730.
Ambrozic J., Brzan Simenc G., Prokselj K., Tul N., Cvijic M., LucovnikM. Lung and cardiac ultrasound for hemodynamic monitoringof patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol. 2017; 49: 104–9.
Portelli M, Baron B. Clinical Presentation of Preeclampsia andthe Diagnostic Value of Proteins and Their Methylation Productsas Biomarkers in Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia and TheirNewborns. J Pregnancy. 2018 Jun 28; 2018: 2632-637. doi:10.1155/2018/2632637.
Ives C. W., Sinkey R., Rajapreyar I., Tita A. T., Oparil S.Preeclampsia—Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentations:JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76:1690-1702.
Hurrell A, Duhig K, Vandermolen B, Shennan AH. Recent advancesin the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia. Fac Rev.2020 16; 9: 10. doi: 10.12703/b/9-10.
22 Dimitriadis E., Rolnik D. L., Zhou W., Estrada-Gutierrez G., KogaK., Francisco R. P. V., Whitehead C., et al. Pre-eclampsia. Nat RevDis Primers. 2023 16; 9(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6.
Duhig K. E., Myers J., Seed P. T., et al. Placental growth factortesting to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre,pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlledtrial. Lancet. 2019; 393 (10183): 1807-1818. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33212-4.
Backes CH, Markham K, Moorehead P, Cordero L, Nankervis CA,Giannone PJ. Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. JPregnancy. 2011; 2011:214365. doi: 10.1155/2011/214365. Epub2011 Apr 4. PMID: 21547086; PMCID: PMC3087144.
Dimitriadis, E., Rolnik, D.L., Zhou, W. et al. Pre-eclampsia. NatRev Dis Primers 9, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6.
Vousden N., Nathan H. L., Shennan A. H. Innovations in vital signsmeasurement for the detection of hypertension and shock in pregnancy.Reprod Health. 2018; 15: 92
Hurrell A., Webster L., Chappell L. C., Shennan A. H. The assessmentof blood pressure in pregnant women: pitfalls and novelapproaches. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226 (2S): S804-S818.
Sovio U., Gaccioli F., Cook E., Hund M., Charnock-Jones D. S., etal. Prediction of preeclampsia using the soluble fms-like tyrosinekinase 1 to placental growth factor ratio: a prospective cohort studyof unselected nulliparous women. Hypertension 2017; 69: 731–738.
Thilaganathan B. Pre-eclampsia and the cardiovascular-placentalaxis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51: 714-717.
Armaly Z., Jadaon J. E., Jabbour A., et al. Preeclampsia: novelmechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches. Front Physiol.2018; 9: 973.
Pisani L., De Nicolo A., Schiavone M., et al. Lung Ultrasound forDetection of Pulmonary Complications in Critically Ill Obstetric Patientsin a Resource-Limited Setting. The American Journal of TropicalMedicine and Hygiene. 2021; 104 (2): 478-486. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0996
Anthony J., Schoeman L. K. Fluid management in pre-eclampsia.Obstet Med. 2013; 6 (3): 100-104.
Ansari N., Manalai P., Maruf F., Currie S., Stekelenburg J., et al.Quality of care in early detection and management of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in health facilities in Afghanistan. BMC PregnancyChildbirth. 2019; 19 (1): 36. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2143-0.